22.07.2013 Views

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Concealed Rhetoric in Scientistic Sociology 95<br />

tion of the human mind in favor of a different "symbolic equipment."<br />

That he is entirely willing to utilize traditional rhetoric<br />

in making his point may be seen from the following passage:<br />

Untold nervous energy, time, <strong>and</strong> natural resources are wasted in<br />

warfare upon or protection against entirely imaginary monsters conjured<br />

up by words. Widespread mental disorders result from constantly<br />

finding the world different from the word-maps upon which we rely<br />

for guidance <strong>and</strong> adjustment. Social problems cannot be solved as long<br />

as they are stated in terms as primitive <strong>and</strong> unrealistic as those which<br />

attributed disease to demons <strong>and</strong> witches. lO<br />

A feature of another kind indicating that a good many sociologists<br />

are engaged in more or less concealed deliberative oratory<br />

is the presence in their work of a large amount of enthymematic<br />

reasoning. Reasoning in this form is a rhetorical kind of convincing,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the enthymeme is actually described by Aristotle as, the<br />

"rhetorical syllogism." 11 In the textbooks of logic it is defined as<br />

a syllogism with one of the propositions withheld. In the argument<br />

All who are patriots should be willing to sacrifice for their country.<br />

You should be willing to sacrifice for your country.<br />

the minor premise, "You are a patriot," is missing. It has been<br />

omitted because the maker of the argument has assumed that it is<br />

granted by the hearer <strong>and</strong> will be supplied by him to complete<br />

the argument.<br />

This type of argument is rightly described as rhetorical because<br />

the rhetorician always gets his leverage by starting with things<br />

that are accepted. By combining these with things he wants to<br />

get accepted ("identification" again) he moves on to the conclusion<br />

which is his object. In other words, because the rhetorician can<br />

assume certain things-because he does not have to demonstrate<br />

every proposition in his argument-he can work from statements<br />

which are essentially appeals. He studies beforeh<strong>and</strong> the disposition<br />

of his auditors <strong>and</strong> takes note of those beliefs which will<br />

afford him firm ground-those general convictions about which

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!