Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Knowleage: Unused <strong>and</strong> Misused 131<br />
"wise society" can be found in the proceedings <strong>and</strong> final resolution<br />
of the American Assembly in 1953, called together to discuss "SOM<br />
cial security in modem times." 12 But any actuarial examination of<br />
social security schemes in advanced democracies shows that these<br />
collectives have less wisdom <strong>and</strong> long-range foresight in planning<br />
the welfare of society than has the average head of a family for his<br />
dependents.<br />
One reason for this, of course, is that the head of a family can<br />
be sure of love <strong>and</strong> support even if he has to make, in the interest<br />
of long-range goals, economic decisions which frustrate the immeM<br />
diate preferences of some members of the family. The governments<br />
of democracies usually believe that they cannot afford such<br />
sanity. It is "politically impossible."<br />
Possibly, as Richard LaPiere shows in his book, The Freudian<br />
Ethic (1959), the same sentiments <strong>and</strong> pseudo ethics that have rendered<br />
impotent whatever wisdom may be available to some men<br />
in government now tend to corrupt at least certain families in<br />
America. Parents read that they ought to run the family by public<br />
opinion polls among brats. If this should become a dominant feature<br />
of our families, it is likely that more <strong>and</strong> more of them will<br />
become incompetent. In so far as this stems from the same source<br />
as the cancer in government-a vulgar misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing of democracy<br />
<strong>and</strong> equality-I see little reason for optimism when the<br />
more powerful of two incompetents, a certain type of modern<br />
government, tells a certain type of modern family that it needs the<br />
central government to protect it from its own folly. A collusion of<br />
two fools will hardly lead to a sane public policy.<br />
In some circles of contemporary sociology it is fashionable to<br />
view society <strong>and</strong> its subdivisions as "systems." Often, however, it<br />
seems to me, not enough care is taken in regard to important ontoM<br />
logical distinctions. For instance, Karl <strong>von</strong> Frisch, in his studies<br />
of the bees, conceives of their state as a highly articulate system;<br />
but we hardly assume the bees to know themselves as constituent<br />
members of a system. In other words, there are at least two different<br />
possibilities when we speak of a social system. The researcher<br />
<strong>and</strong> theorist, in order to make puzzling phenomena comprehen-