22.07.2013 Views

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

230 Scientzsm <strong>and</strong> <strong>Values</strong><br />

forms which will provide for the effective collaboration between<br />

different societies that are dependent upon one another but lack<br />

the commensurate psychological cohesion. This international<br />

"growing together" requires a deepened underst<strong>and</strong>ing of institutional<br />

similarities <strong>and</strong> differences. Such underst<strong>and</strong>ing can be<br />

derived only from sure methods of comparison. The actual process<br />

of "growing together" requires guidance, hence the need for a<br />

theory of institutional synthesis. In the absence of such a theory,<br />

peoples will not be able to determine which institution should be<br />

ab<strong>and</strong>oned, enlarged, taken over, reformed or developed jointly,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the process of "growing together" might be reversed into a<br />

disorderly <strong>and</strong> dangerous melee.<br />

Thirdly, the global ideological conflict would not be global except<br />

for the circumstance that all members of humanity now have<br />

become interrelated <strong>and</strong> can communicate virtually instantly with<br />

one another. The leading societies are in disagreement about the<br />

ways by which the world society is to be organized. This disagreement<br />

is rendered acute by the fact that the contending arguments<br />

are almost entirely irrational. Each contending ideology has its<br />

own solution. We believe that our solution is the better one, <strong>and</strong>,<br />

for diverse reasons, it probably is. But if actual events can supply<br />

us guidance, we have not developed the methodogy for presenting<br />

our arguments so effectively <strong>and</strong> rationally that they will invite<br />

acceptance by all men-<strong>and</strong>, incidentally, considered <strong>and</strong> serene<br />

acceptance by those who now accept them somewhat hesitantly on<br />

faith. We hold strong opinions about political organization, but,<br />

unfortunately, those notions are convincing only to ourselves <strong>and</strong><br />

to people who "think as we do." We cannot prove that we are<br />

right, for-among other reasons-we have failed to work out our<br />

self-evident criteria.<br />

v<br />

The purpose of political-organizational schemes, at least in so<br />

far as they are stated to the public, is to achieve a higher degree<br />

of freedom. The precise meaning of the term "freedom" is subject<br />

to argument. This argument will continue as, long as political

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!