Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
230 Scientzsm <strong>and</strong> <strong>Values</strong><br />
forms which will provide for the effective collaboration between<br />
different societies that are dependent upon one another but lack<br />
the commensurate psychological cohesion. This international<br />
"growing together" requires a deepened underst<strong>and</strong>ing of institutional<br />
similarities <strong>and</strong> differences. Such underst<strong>and</strong>ing can be<br />
derived only from sure methods of comparison. The actual process<br />
of "growing together" requires guidance, hence the need for a<br />
theory of institutional synthesis. In the absence of such a theory,<br />
peoples will not be able to determine which institution should be<br />
ab<strong>and</strong>oned, enlarged, taken over, reformed or developed jointly,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the process of "growing together" might be reversed into a<br />
disorderly <strong>and</strong> dangerous melee.<br />
Thirdly, the global ideological conflict would not be global except<br />
for the circumstance that all members of humanity now have<br />
become interrelated <strong>and</strong> can communicate virtually instantly with<br />
one another. The leading societies are in disagreement about the<br />
ways by which the world society is to be organized. This disagreement<br />
is rendered acute by the fact that the contending arguments<br />
are almost entirely irrational. Each contending ideology has its<br />
own solution. We believe that our solution is the better one, <strong>and</strong>,<br />
for diverse reasons, it probably is. But if actual events can supply<br />
us guidance, we have not developed the methodogy for presenting<br />
our arguments so effectively <strong>and</strong> rationally that they will invite<br />
acceptance by all men-<strong>and</strong>, incidentally, considered <strong>and</strong> serene<br />
acceptance by those who now accept them somewhat hesitantly on<br />
faith. We hold strong opinions about political organization, but,<br />
unfortunately, those notions are convincing only to ourselves <strong>and</strong><br />
to people who "think as we do." We cannot prove that we are<br />
right, for-among other reasons-we have failed to work out our<br />
self-evident criteria.<br />
v<br />
The purpose of political-organizational schemes, at least in so<br />
far as they are stated to the public, is to achieve a higher degree<br />
of freedom. The precise meaning of the term "freedom" is subject<br />
to argument. This argument will continue as, long as political