18.08.2013 Views

Return - IOM Publications - International Organization for Migration

Return - IOM Publications - International Organization for Migration

Return - IOM Publications - International Organization for Migration

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE NETHERLANDS<br />

1. INVOLUNTARY RETURN<br />

1.1 POLICY<br />

253<br />

THE NETHERLANDS<br />

The Netherlands has traditionally attracted large numbers of <strong>for</strong>eigners, many without a legal<br />

right of entry or residence. This has given rise to considerable public debate about migration in<br />

recent years and a stronger focus by successive governments on return migration. The authorities<br />

have <strong>for</strong> some time been concerned with the need to return failed asylum seekers and other<br />

migrants in irregular circumstances to their countries of origin or safe third countries.<br />

In 2000, the government introduced the Aliens Act 2000 1 to re<strong>for</strong>m the legal status of migrants<br />

through more stringent and shortened procedures <strong>for</strong> asylum seekers. The aim of the revision<br />

was to simplify and accelerate the processing of asylum applications, in order to reduce stateprovided<br />

benefits and reception costs.<br />

Since then, policy-makers have tried to effectively en<strong>for</strong>ce the Act through removal and repatriation<br />

of illegal aliens from the territory, and have anticipated a complementary integration programme<br />

<strong>for</strong> select asylum seekers in 2004. The current government is pursuing a more tightly<br />

managed asylum process by announcing new legislation to enable it to deport a large number of<br />

long-staying asylum seekers not approved <strong>for</strong> resident status over the next three years.<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e 2002, the Netherlands experienced several years of high economic growth, which<br />

resulted in significant social changes and also saw a reduction in economic activities. Rising<br />

public anxiety about immigration, coupled with an insufficiently funded police <strong>for</strong>ce, were key<br />

determinants of the Dutch immigration policy. In the aftermath of the 11 September 2001 attacks<br />

in the USA, and the threat of public security posed by terrorists, public debate on immigration<br />

became more radical, and certain categories of immigrants were perceived as potential terrorists.<br />

In the run-up to the general elections in 2003, there were heated public debates on immigration<br />

policy, which some critics attributed to an over-emphasis in Dutch immigration law and policy<br />

on control, security and restriction, rather than on assessing actual immigration needs.<br />

The stricter immigration policy approach, particularly towards irregular migrants, aims at discouraging<br />

potential migrants from entering the Netherlands in the first place and encouraging<br />

those who wish to return to repatriate to their countries of origin or to a third country.<br />

In 2000, the Netherlands was the fourth biggest asylum receiving country. Since then, stricter<br />

immigration policies have led to progressive reductions in asylum applications. The number of<br />

asylum requests in 2001 was 32,579; in 2002, 18,667 and in 2003, 13,400. The asylum approval

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!