18.08.2013 Views

Return - IOM Publications - International Organization for Migration

Return - IOM Publications - International Organization for Migration

Return - IOM Publications - International Organization for Migration

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

375<br />

SWITZERLAND<br />

Switzerland has concluded a number of readmission agreements with its neighbours and other<br />

countries, in order to return rejected asylum seekers and undocumented migrants. Readmission<br />

agreements have been concluded with Albania, Armenia, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina,<br />

Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Kyrgyzstan, Italy, Latvia,<br />

Liechtenstein, Lithuania, FYR of Macedonia, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, Sri Lanka and<br />

Sweden.<br />

Transit agreements have been concluded <strong>for</strong> the repatriation of Serbia and Montenegro nationals<br />

with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Germany, Italy, Croatia, Austria, Slovenia and Hungary.<br />

Agreements have also been made with Germany, Croatia, Austria and Slovenia <strong>for</strong> return of war<br />

refugees from Bosnia and Herzegovina.<br />

There is generally no obligation, under the readmission agreements to notify the third country on<br />

whether the returnee’s asylum application had been refused on <strong>for</strong>mal grounds, and not on merit.<br />

While not party to the Dublin Convention, Switzerland is currently negotiating with the European<br />

Union regarding its implementation. The same applies to the Schengen Treaty.<br />

Cost Effectiveness Analysis<br />

1.4 STATISTICS ON INVOLUNTARY RETURN<br />

TABLE 3<br />

STATISTICS ON INVOLUNTARY RETURN<br />

Year Number Repatriated<br />

to Country of Origin or Third Country<br />

2000 5,346<br />

2001 2,275<br />

2002 2,748<br />

2003 (October) 2,859<br />

Source: Federal Office <strong>for</strong> Refugees.<br />

Compared to the costs incurred by the continued stay of a person liable <strong>for</strong> deportation in Switzerland,<br />

<strong>for</strong>ced returns are generally considered by FOR to be a more cost-effective alternative.<br />

Yet, in comparison to voluntary returns, involuntary returns regularly turn out to be much more<br />

expensive and less sustainable. Yet the two approaches influence and complement each other.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!