18.08.2013 Views

Return - IOM Publications - International Organization for Migration

Return - IOM Publications - International Organization for Migration

Return - IOM Publications - International Organization for Migration

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BELGIUM<br />

1. INVOLUNTARY RETURN<br />

1.1 POLICY<br />

39<br />

BELGIUM<br />

Rising numbers of asylum applications and several incidents relating to migration have sparked<br />

off a new debate on migration needs in Belgium. In 1999, the Government responded with an<br />

immigration programme focused on: the creation of a status <strong>for</strong> persons displaced by war; the<br />

acceleration of the asylum procedure; re<strong>for</strong>m of the nationality law to encourage integration of<br />

migrants; a campaign of regularization; expulsion of undocumented migrants not eligible <strong>for</strong><br />

regularization; and re<strong>for</strong>mation of the administration and institutions responsible <strong>for</strong> immigration.<br />

As a result in 2000, the government tightened the asylum regulations with a new law that came<br />

into <strong>for</strong>ce in January 2001 1 and introduced a three-week campaign to legalize undocumented<br />

migrants. In March 2000, the law on naturalization was re<strong>for</strong>med. The naturalization regulations<br />

were relaxed, allowing all <strong>for</strong>eigners legally residing in Belgium to become Belgians without a<br />

check on their “desire to integrate”. With this, Belgium has introduced some of the most liberal<br />

legislation on nationality in the European Union. In line with its programme and in pursuance of<br />

a “last in, first out” policy, the length of the asylum procedure was reduced from an average of<br />

three years (in 1999) to one year.<br />

The un<strong>for</strong>tunate case of a young Nigerian woman, Sémira Adamu, who died during a deportation<br />

process, 2 and the removal of a five-year-old girl to the Democratic Republic of Congo in<br />

October 2002, whilst her mother was in Canada, were given nationwide press coverage, questioning<br />

the authorities’ practices and decisions. These incidents have led to a more sensitive<br />

practice regarding <strong>for</strong>ced return. For Belgium, the detention and removal of failed asylum seekers<br />

does not constitute a policy priority. Emphasis is rather placed on voluntary return in the<br />

context of a predominantly administrative (and not criminal) legislation on asylum.<br />

In 2003, the Belgian immigration policy was as ever dominated by control and restriction of inflowing<br />

migration aligned with the EU harmonization of immigration, as well as by ef<strong>for</strong>ts to<br />

integrate <strong>for</strong>eigners residing legally in Belgium. The current coalition government, as well as the<br />

Flemish and Walloon population, are divided over the debate on the introduction of the right to<br />

vote <strong>for</strong> non-EU nationals.<br />

1.2 LEGISLATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND PROVISIONS<br />

Forced return is regulated by the Loi du 15 décembre 1980 sur l’accès au territoire, le séjour,<br />

l’établissement et l’éloignement des étrangers (Immigration Act of 15 December 1980) 3 and the<br />

Arrêté Royal (Royal Decree) of 8 October 1981.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!