18.08.2013 Views

Return - IOM Publications - International Organization for Migration

Return - IOM Publications - International Organization for Migration

Return - IOM Publications - International Organization for Migration

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

79<br />

DENMARK<br />

exemption of passports <strong>for</strong> citizens travelling within this area, as well as working and residence<br />

permits. It does not regulate the question of expulsion and leaves the issue of protection of<br />

negative decisions with the relevant national authorities and at the level of domestic legislation<br />

and administration.<br />

All parties to the agreement have the right to request the return of <strong>for</strong>eigners who have transited<br />

through Finland, Sweden, Norway, Iceland and Denmark. Such a request has to be made not<br />

later than within a month of the authorities awareness of the aliens’ presence on the territory, and<br />

the return must be completed not later than within six months of the illegal entry.<br />

With the joining of Finland, Sweden and Denmark in the Schengen Agreement, the Nordic<br />

Passport Control Agreement was modified in the late 1990s to allow <strong>for</strong> the three countries to<br />

adapt to the Schengen requirements.<br />

The EU and the Annex 9 removal documents are used occasionally and specifically in connection<br />

with escorted deportations.<br />

Costs<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation on expulsion costs is currently not available.<br />

Detention<br />

In practice, detention is widely used when the applicant’s identity and/or travel route is not<br />

established, as per the changes in the legislation. Police may now also detain asylum seekers<br />

who are not cooperative in the examination of their asylum claim and/or their removal.<br />

According to Section 36 of the Aliens Act of 1983, asylum seekers may be further detained if the<br />

police consider that alternative measures (deposit of travel documents at the police station, provision<br />

of bail, stay at accommodation determined by the police, report to the police as determined<br />

by the authorities) are insufficient to ensure that the applicant does not abscond, and<br />

hinder thus the removal process. Foreigners detained on grounds of criminal activities are not<br />

subject to this provision and are treated differently.<br />

The police, being responsible <strong>for</strong> all return-related activities can detain a <strong>for</strong>eigner on the abovementioned<br />

grounds <strong>for</strong> an initial three days. Only a court can prolong detention thereafter <strong>for</strong> a<br />

period of four weeks. Further prolongation is subject to judicial review every four weeks. Thus<br />

there is no maximum detention period, except <strong>for</strong> asylum seekers processed under the manifestly<br />

unfounded procedure, who cannot be detained <strong>for</strong> more than seven consecutive days.<br />

There are no official statistics on the number of detainees. In practice, detention is widely used at<br />

all stages of the asylum procedure. According to ECRE, detention seems to be applied routinely<br />

to certain nationalities or categories of asylum applicants, including those, whose cases are processed<br />

under the accelerated procedure <strong>for</strong> manifestly unfounded claims. 7 This seems to apply<br />

<strong>for</strong> Russians and nationals from the Baltic States. Courts generally seem to follow the police<br />

decisions, which results in a situation where the majority of asylum seekers are detained at some<br />

point of the examination of their application.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!