06.10.2013 Views

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“polyvocality” and ambiguity <strong>of</strong> the text “<strong>by</strong> bringing into play a plurality <strong>of</strong><br />

speakers and <strong>at</strong>titudes” but also “dram<strong>at</strong>izes the problem<strong>at</strong>ic rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between<br />

any utterance and its origin.” 162 <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> this technique is another ambiguity:<br />

“on the one hand the presence <strong>of</strong> a narr<strong>at</strong>or may cre<strong>at</strong>e an ironic distancing. On<br />

the other, the tinting <strong>of</strong> the narr<strong>at</strong>or’s speech with character’s language may<br />

promote emp<strong>at</strong>hetic identific<strong>at</strong>ion on the part <strong>of</strong> reader” (Rimmon-Kenan 115).<br />

Thus, the reader may be left unable to choose between irony and emp<strong>at</strong>hy towards<br />

the character, an effect which Feuchtwanger’s narr<strong>at</strong>or <strong>of</strong>ten exploits <strong>by</strong> allowing<br />

the reader access to Goya’s innermost thoughts while <strong>at</strong> the same time evoking<br />

ironic distance toward him. Moreover, when used for ekphrasis, free indirect<br />

discourse produces yet another ambiguity between the voices. Ekphrasis in free in<br />

direct discourse may be constituted <strong>by</strong> the character’s pre-verbal thought and<br />

feelings, thus resulting in a verbalized (<strong>by</strong> the narr<strong>at</strong>or) yet pre- or non-verbal<br />

ekphrasis (<strong>of</strong> the character).<br />

For example, when Goya muses about Velazquez’ Las meninas and plans<br />

his own portrait <strong>of</strong> the king’s family (La familia de Carlos IV), his thoughts are<br />

narr<strong>at</strong>ed through the third person voice <strong>of</strong> the narr<strong>at</strong>or, but clearly in Goya’s<br />

perspective:<br />

Nein, er wird keine vertrackte Anekdote malen wie van Loo, und niemand<br />

wird sagen dürfen, was dem Velazquez erlaubt sei, sei dem Goya nicht<br />

erlaubt. [...] Und in der Dunkelheit, mit innerm Jubel, sah er deutlich, was<br />

er malen wollte, die wiederstrebenden Farben, die er zwingen wird, eins<br />

zu sein, den ganzen schillernden, glitzernden Einklang, und inmitten des<br />

162 Shlomith Rimmon-Kenan, Narr<strong>at</strong>ive Fiction: Contemporary Poetics (London and New York:<br />

Routledge, 1983) 111-113. On the production <strong>of</strong> ambiguity through the confusion between the<br />

voices <strong>of</strong> the narr<strong>at</strong>or and characters in free indirect discourse see also Gerard Genette, Narr<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

Discourse Revisited (Ithaka, NY: Cornell UP, 1988) 52-55.<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!