Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...
Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...
Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
“polyvocality” and ambiguity <strong>of</strong> the text “<strong>by</strong> bringing into play a plurality <strong>of</strong><br />
speakers and <strong>at</strong>titudes” but also “dram<strong>at</strong>izes the problem<strong>at</strong>ic rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between<br />
any utterance and its origin.” 162 <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> this technique is another ambiguity:<br />
“on the one hand the presence <strong>of</strong> a narr<strong>at</strong>or may cre<strong>at</strong>e an ironic distancing. On<br />
the other, the tinting <strong>of</strong> the narr<strong>at</strong>or’s speech with character’s language may<br />
promote emp<strong>at</strong>hetic identific<strong>at</strong>ion on the part <strong>of</strong> reader” (Rimmon-Kenan 115).<br />
Thus, the reader may be left unable to choose between irony and emp<strong>at</strong>hy towards<br />
the character, an effect which Feuchtwanger’s narr<strong>at</strong>or <strong>of</strong>ten exploits <strong>by</strong> allowing<br />
the reader access to Goya’s innermost thoughts while <strong>at</strong> the same time evoking<br />
ironic distance toward him. Moreover, when used for ekphrasis, free indirect<br />
discourse produces yet another ambiguity between the voices. Ekphrasis in free in<br />
direct discourse may be constituted <strong>by</strong> the character’s pre-verbal thought and<br />
feelings, thus resulting in a verbalized (<strong>by</strong> the narr<strong>at</strong>or) yet pre- or non-verbal<br />
ekphrasis (<strong>of</strong> the character).<br />
For example, when Goya muses about Velazquez’ Las meninas and plans<br />
his own portrait <strong>of</strong> the king’s family (La familia de Carlos IV), his thoughts are<br />
narr<strong>at</strong>ed through the third person voice <strong>of</strong> the narr<strong>at</strong>or, but clearly in Goya’s<br />
perspective:<br />
Nein, er wird keine vertrackte Anekdote malen wie van Loo, und niemand<br />
wird sagen dürfen, was dem Velazquez erlaubt sei, sei dem Goya nicht<br />
erlaubt. [...] Und in der Dunkelheit, mit innerm Jubel, sah er deutlich, was<br />
er malen wollte, die wiederstrebenden Farben, die er zwingen wird, eins<br />
zu sein, den ganzen schillernden, glitzernden Einklang, und inmitten des<br />
162 Shlomith Rimmon-Kenan, Narr<strong>at</strong>ive Fiction: Contemporary Poetics (London and New York:<br />
Routledge, 1983) 111-113. On the production <strong>of</strong> ambiguity through the confusion between the<br />
voices <strong>of</strong> the narr<strong>at</strong>or and characters in free indirect discourse see also Gerard Genette, Narr<strong>at</strong>ive<br />
Discourse Revisited (Ithaka, NY: Cornell UP, 1988) 52-55.<br />
130