06.10.2013 Views

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

While Korda also does not show Saskia as a character in the film, he goes<br />

even further than Zuckmayer <strong>by</strong> not even showing her portrait. In so doing, Korda<br />

further removes Saskia from reality, transforming her into a figment <strong>of</strong><br />

“Rembrandt’s” imagin<strong>at</strong>ion, and emphasizing “Rembrandt’s” idealizing <strong>of</strong> her yet<br />

more. <strong>The</strong> film further achieves this focus on “Rembrandt” and his mental<br />

involvement, or even life, in his art through an interpretive ekphrasis <strong>of</strong> another<br />

self portrait, which takes up Zuckmayer’s use <strong>of</strong> a deliber<strong>at</strong>e anachronism for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> constructing his filmic image <strong>of</strong> “Rembrandt”: <strong>The</strong> Painter in his<br />

Studio (c.1629).<br />

Although this painting was cre<strong>at</strong>ed not only long before Saskia’s de<strong>at</strong>h,<br />

but even before their marriage, depicting a very young painter, the anachronism<br />

serves a deliber<strong>at</strong>e function in this scene, shifting the focus from the revel<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

Saskia’s identity to the process <strong>of</strong> artistic cre<strong>at</strong>ion and inspir<strong>at</strong>ion, and to the art<br />

work itself. <strong>The</strong> scene begins with a brief tableau vivant <strong>of</strong> an inverted mirror<br />

image <strong>of</strong> th<strong>at</strong> self portrait. “Rembrandt” is standing several feet away from his<br />

canvas, but here he is on the viewer’s right (unlike in the original picture) while<br />

the canvas looms large in the foreground on the left, dwarfing the artist himself.<br />

As Rembrandt in his picture, he is wearing shab<strong>by</strong> workman’s clothes th<strong>at</strong><br />

contrast with his previous elegant <strong>at</strong>tire, and overall, he looks less refined and<br />

r<strong>at</strong>her disheveled. After briefly contempl<strong>at</strong>ing the canvas, “Rembrandt”<br />

approaches it and begins (or continues?) to paint. As in the original picture, the<br />

viewer does not know <strong>at</strong> which stage the work is, if the artist has just begun or is<br />

about to finish it, and <strong>at</strong> no time are we shown even the slightest part <strong>of</strong> the work.<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!