06.10.2013 Views

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TRACY CHEVALIER AND PETER WEBBER: GIRL WITH A PEARL EARRING<br />

A virtually unavoidable change made in film adapt<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> novels is the<br />

condens<strong>at</strong>ion or deletion <strong>of</strong> scenes. Peter Webber’s film coalesces into a single<br />

scene two separ<strong>at</strong>e, rel<strong>at</strong>ively secondary episodes <strong>of</strong> the novel: the birth<br />

celebr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Vermeer’s eleventh child and the viewing <strong>of</strong> Woman with a Pearl<br />

Necklace <strong>by</strong> his p<strong>at</strong>ron Van Ruijven. <strong>The</strong> film merges these episodes into a<br />

pivotal scene th<strong>at</strong> not only foregrounds class and power rel<strong>at</strong>ions in Vermeer's<br />

world, but also changes the point <strong>of</strong> view from which the painting is interpreted.<br />

Moreover, the film cuts one and significantly modifies two <strong>of</strong> Griet’s previous<br />

three ekphrases <strong>of</strong> th<strong>at</strong> painting th<strong>at</strong> occur in the novel. 212<br />

In Chevalier’s narr<strong>at</strong>ive, Griet’s first view <strong>of</strong> Woman With a Pearl<br />

Necklace (ca. 1664) occurs when she is cleaning up in Vermeer’s <strong>at</strong>elier for the<br />

first time. Contempl<strong>at</strong>ing the painting, Griet begins to reflect on its meaning for<br />

herself, ending in the desire to identify with the subject <strong>of</strong> the painting and to<br />

enter the world <strong>of</strong> its cre<strong>at</strong>or: “I wanted to wear the mantle and the pearls. I<br />

wanted to know the man who painted her like th<strong>at</strong>” (36). Moreover, she muses<br />

212 <strong>The</strong>re have so far been only two longer studies <strong>of</strong> Chevalier’s Girl with a Pearl Earring.,<br />

neither <strong>of</strong> which compares it to the film adapt<strong>at</strong>ion. Deborah H. Cibelli in “'Girl with a Pearl<br />

Earring': Painting, Reality, Fiction,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Popular Culture 37.4 (2004): 583-92, compares<br />

Chevalier’s tre<strong>at</strong>ment <strong>of</strong> the painting and Vermeer to art historical accounts, and seems to be<br />

mostly interested in clarifying wh<strong>at</strong> is “reality” and wh<strong>at</strong> is “fiction” in this novel. Martina<br />

Wagner-Egelhaaf, “Ein anderes Zeichen,” Dinge: Medien der Aneignung, Grenzen der Verfügung,<br />

eds. Gisela Ecker, Claudia Breger, and Susanne Scholz (Königstein/Taunus: Helmer, 2002) 87-90,<br />

emphasizes Griet’s process <strong>of</strong> emancip<strong>at</strong>ion and her resistance to fulfill the roles accorded to her<br />

<strong>by</strong> the men in her life. She does not, however, connect this interpret<strong>at</strong>ion to the original painting<br />

nor to Griet’s ekphrases <strong>of</strong> other works, which I believe is significant for understanding not only<br />

the full extent <strong>of</strong> her emancip<strong>at</strong>ion, but moreover, the importance <strong>of</strong> the changes in the film, which<br />

undo her agency and emancip<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

201

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!