06.10.2013 Views

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

etween social classes and as the collision between male and female gazes<br />

anchored in their different social identities.<br />

Similarly, as the change <strong>of</strong> the title suggests, Brent Shield’s film Brush<br />

with F<strong>at</strong>e (2003) emphasizes the “f<strong>at</strong>eful” identity <strong>of</strong> the painting and its socio-<br />

political dimension <strong>by</strong> changing the chronology <strong>of</strong> the scenes and <strong>by</strong> providing a<br />

frame narr<strong>at</strong>ive. 206 Thus, the Nazi f<strong>at</strong>her <strong>of</strong> the present owner Cornelia, r<strong>at</strong>her<br />

than she herself, becomes the author <strong>of</strong> the main ekphrastic description <strong>of</strong> the<br />

painting. Moreover, the frame story sets Richard’s male voice <strong>of</strong> reason (Thomas<br />

Gibson) against Cornelia’s female emotionality (played <strong>by</strong> Glenn Close). In short,<br />

in both films, the women’s role is changed from seeing subject to objects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

male gaze and logos, there<strong>by</strong> also reducing or questioning their ekphrastic<br />

agency. 207<br />

In these novels and films, then, ekphrasis is tied, in very different ways, to<br />

issues <strong>of</strong> gender and class. Whereas in the two novels, interpretive ekphrases <strong>by</strong><br />

the female protagonists predomin<strong>at</strong>e, the majority <strong>of</strong> the ekphrases in the films are<br />

depictive and from a male perspective. By changing the type and perspective <strong>of</strong><br />

ekphrasis, the filmmakers revert back to the male-oriented tradition <strong>of</strong> ekphrasis<br />

which the female authors have successfully sought to challenge and correct in<br />

their novels. However, both the novels and the films are in fact focusing on and<br />

206 Brush with F<strong>at</strong>e, dir. Brent Shields, perf. Glenn Close, Thomas Gibson, and Ellen Burstyn,<br />

DVD, Hallmark Hall <strong>of</strong> Fame, 2003.<br />

207 Feminist film critics such as <strong>Laura</strong> Mulvey and Mary Ann Doane have shown how film has<br />

denied the female spect<strong>at</strong>or the ability to identify with the screen image as it “has historically<br />

articul<strong>at</strong>ed its stories through a confl<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> its central axis <strong>of</strong> seeing/being seen with the<br />

opposition male/female.” See Mary Ann Doane, Femmes F<strong>at</strong>ales: Feminism, Film <strong>The</strong>ory,<br />

Psychoanalysis. (New York and London: Routledge, 1991), 165. See also <strong>Laura</strong> Mulvey, Visual<br />

and Other Pleasures (Bloomington : Indiana <strong>University</strong> Press, 1989).<br />

195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!