06.10.2013 Views

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

means and other filmic devices such as moving camera, zoom, etc. for the viewer<br />

to read it as an ekphrastic transmedializ<strong>at</strong>ion. Plett’s theory <strong>of</strong> quot<strong>at</strong>ion will thus<br />

be a useful tool for analyzing the spectrum from quot<strong>at</strong>ion to ekphrasis in film.<br />

Plett’s system looks <strong>at</strong> the “quantity, quality, distribution, frequency,<br />

interference, and markers <strong>of</strong> quot<strong>at</strong>ion” (Plett 8). With regard to quantity, how<br />

much from the quoted image is used, whether it is shown whole or in parts, and<br />

which parts <strong>of</strong> it, will provide insights into the function <strong>of</strong> the image in the text or<br />

film. For example, in Alain Resnais’ short film Guernica, Picasso’s famous image<br />

is never shown whole, but fragmented throughout, thus underscoring the film’s<br />

<strong>at</strong>mosphere <strong>of</strong> violence and destruction. Plett’s c<strong>at</strong>egory <strong>of</strong> quality refers to the<br />

extent to and way in which a quot<strong>at</strong>ion is reshaped and recontextualized. <strong>The</strong><br />

result <strong>of</strong> transposing one medium to another can either be “intertextual identity”<br />

or “intertextual devi<strong>at</strong>ion” (Plett 9). Plett distinguishes between the surface<br />

structure, the gramm<strong>at</strong>ical and structural transform<strong>at</strong>ions, and deep structure, the<br />

different layers <strong>of</strong> meaning gener<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>by</strong> the intersection <strong>of</strong> and dialog between<br />

two or more texts (9-10). For example, as Claus Clüver has shown, Anne Sexton’s<br />

“Starry Night” transl<strong>at</strong>es Van Gogh’s painting into words, reproducing the details<br />

<strong>of</strong> it as well as its point <strong>of</strong> view (“Intersemiotic” 64-67). In Plett’s terms, it would<br />

be an example <strong>of</strong> intertextual identity both in its surface and deep structure. By<br />

contrast, Alexander Fhares’ “Ikarus” (1972) omits many items from Breughel’s<br />

painting and replaces them with (<strong>of</strong>ten anachronistic) elements not found in the<br />

work. <strong>The</strong> surface structure <strong>of</strong> the quot<strong>at</strong>ion thus devi<strong>at</strong>es from the original.<br />

However, in its deep structure, the poet is as consciously anachronistic as<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!