Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...
Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...
Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
struggle with himself and his internal demons, but he emphasizes the artist’s<br />
victory over them. However, Feuchtwanger also particip<strong>at</strong>es <strong>at</strong> another level in<br />
this b<strong>at</strong>tle between the artist and his demons. His ekphrastic transposition <strong>of</strong> this<br />
scene <strong>of</strong> the cre<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the Sueño de la razón conveys a power to the artist th<strong>at</strong> he<br />
does not have in Goya’s original aqu<strong>at</strong>int. It is thus only through Feuchtwanger’s<br />
ekphrasis th<strong>at</strong> Goya can claim his victory. In other words, this ekphrasis not only<br />
demonstr<strong>at</strong>es the painter’s power, but also th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> the author over the painter<br />
By contrast, in Konrad Wolf’s film two <strong>of</strong> the three ekphrases <strong>of</strong> Goya’s<br />
Sueño de la razón are responses to political situ<strong>at</strong>ions and have no direct<br />
correspondence to episodes in the novel. Another scene in which this aqu<strong>at</strong>int is<br />
dram<strong>at</strong>ized occurs after a fight between Goya and Cayetana and thus has a more<br />
personal, priv<strong>at</strong>e dimension. In all three cases, however, the demons origin<strong>at</strong>e not<br />
within but outside <strong>of</strong> Goya, and the artist is their helpless victim.<br />
<strong>The</strong> first ekphrasis <strong>of</strong> the Sueño de la razón is a brief tableau vivant, th<strong>at</strong><br />
is, an interpretive ekphrasis, r<strong>at</strong>her than a dram<strong>at</strong>ic one. Goya has a fight with his<br />
aide and friend Agustin Esteve about his un-political stance in which Esteve<br />
criticizes Goya for painting only to please his commissioners. Accusing him <strong>of</strong><br />
vanity and denigr<strong>at</strong>ing his paintings as “effektvollen Dreck” (“effect-seeking<br />
dirt”), Esteve emphasizes th<strong>at</strong> precisely because <strong>of</strong> his gre<strong>at</strong>er talent, his “lies” are<br />
also more dangerous than those <strong>of</strong> other painters. Goya, however, gets very angry<br />
<strong>at</strong> his aide and takes gre<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong>fense <strong>at</strong> his words, but instead <strong>of</strong> arguing with him,<br />
he in turn <strong>of</strong>fends him. In the middle <strong>of</strong> his raving anger, Goya suffers from a<br />
mental <strong>at</strong>tack, and, covering his ears, he sits down <strong>at</strong> his desk, in the position <strong>of</strong><br />
145