06.10.2013 Views

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FILM AND PAINTING<br />

Rel<strong>at</strong>ively few scholars have <strong>at</strong>tempted to outline the various ways in<br />

which paintings can be used in film. Susan Felleman’s Art in the Cinem<strong>at</strong>ic<br />

Imagin<strong>at</strong>ion examines a range <strong>of</strong> ways in which films have incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed works <strong>of</strong><br />

art, using “psychoanalytical and feminist theory to uncover the meanings th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

incorpor<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> art has for and in movies.” 41 However, her study does not<br />

account for different ways in which art may be integr<strong>at</strong>ed and used in film, and<br />

her examples range from films in which art plays a minor role as background<br />

picture to films about artists without differenti<strong>at</strong>ing degrees and kinds <strong>of</strong> filmic<br />

appropri<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> art.<br />

Donna L. Poulton in her 1999 dissert<strong>at</strong>ion, Moving Images in Art and<br />

Film, has outlined sixteen c<strong>at</strong>egories for the intertextual integr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> paintings<br />

into fe<strong>at</strong>ure films. 42 With her focus on the quotes referring to art works in films,<br />

several <strong>of</strong> the c<strong>at</strong>egories she outlines could in fact represent instances <strong>of</strong> filmic<br />

ekphrasis and will be further discussed in Chapter 2. However, <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

c<strong>at</strong>egories she analyzes in detail, only one (“Films th<strong>at</strong> directly quote paintings,”<br />

i.e. in which paintings are directly shown to the viewer) could classify as<br />

ekphrastic, while the other two neither require a (real, fictional, or tableau vivant)<br />

image to be used, nor do these films provide any verbal discourse about art.<br />

“Kunstwissenschaft – Medienwissenschaft: Methodologische Anmerkungen zur Filmanalyse,”<br />

Kunst und Künstler im Film, eds. Helmut Korte, and Johannes Zahlten (Hameln: Verlag C.W.<br />

Niemeyer, 1990) 21-42 is somewh<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> an exception, since it is concerned with methodological<br />

problems in the analysis <strong>of</strong> films about artists, in the course <strong>of</strong> which he briefly discusses several<br />

such films. However, his analysis does not pertain specifically to the transmedializ<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the art<br />

work in the film, but has as its goal an overall interpret<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the film.<br />

41 Susan Felleman, Art in the Cinem<strong>at</strong>ic Imagin<strong>at</strong>ion (Austin: <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Texas</strong> Press, <strong>2006</strong>) 2.<br />

42 Donna Lauren Poulton, Moving Images in Art and Film: <strong>The</strong> Intertextual and Fluid Use <strong>of</strong><br />

Painting in Cinema, diss Brigham Young <strong>University</strong>, 1999.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!