06.10.2013 Views

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

Copyright by Laura Mareike Sager 2006 - The University of Texas at ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the space where his mirror is probably loc<strong>at</strong>ed. When the scene jump cuts to th<strong>at</strong><br />

mirror reflection <strong>of</strong> him, “Rembrandt” repe<strong>at</strong>s Solomon’s words, “Vanity <strong>of</strong><br />

vanities, all is vanity.” His brief smile after speaking these words, alluding to the<br />

Self Portrait as Zeuxis, is shown only in his mirror image. Moreover, all other<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> th<strong>at</strong> work are excluded. <strong>The</strong> laughing expression is thus connected to<br />

the biblical message r<strong>at</strong>her than to Rembrandt’s painterly skills and ambitions.<br />

Yet, the mise-en-scène <strong>of</strong> this interpretive ekphrasis points to a filmic<br />

irony: “Rembrandt’s” Solomon quot<strong>at</strong>ion appears as if spoken <strong>by</strong> his mirror<br />

image, so th<strong>at</strong> the mirror as traditional symbol <strong>of</strong> vanity is here used as site <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subject’s realiz<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> all worldly pleasures are meaningless and empty.<br />

Moreover, this realiz<strong>at</strong>ion must also extend to painting and self-portraiture, which<br />

thus becomes not a mean <strong>of</strong> self-knowledge but an expression <strong>of</strong> vanity and self-<br />

importance. <strong>The</strong> film, then, ends <strong>by</strong> questioning the function <strong>of</strong> self portraiture as<br />

means <strong>of</strong> self-knowledge and self-fulfillment. As the last view is only <strong>of</strong><br />

“Rembrandt’s” mirror image, which functions like a frame within the camera<br />

frame, the film underscores not the search for or analysis <strong>of</strong> the self, but the gap<br />

between self and its represent<strong>at</strong>ion. Moreover, the device <strong>of</strong> the frame within the<br />

frame takes the viewer back to the very first shot <strong>of</strong> “Rembrandt” in the pose <strong>of</strong><br />

his 1640 self portrait and its display <strong>of</strong> pride, arrogance, and m<strong>at</strong>erial wealth.<br />

Thus reinterpreting both these l<strong>at</strong>e self-portraits in the light <strong>of</strong> the earlier one, the<br />

film does not show a development towards self-knowledge in the self portraits,<br />

but points to the split between self and its image. 197<br />

197 This does not mean th<strong>at</strong> Korda is here anticip<strong>at</strong>ing l<strong>at</strong>er art historical interpret<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> the self<br />

portraits as self promotion, but only th<strong>at</strong> his use <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>at</strong>e self portraits indic<strong>at</strong>es a slight<br />

departure from the traditional and then prevailing interpret<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!