04.06.2014 Views

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER<br />

7<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Although the South African Constitution protects socio-economic<br />

rights as justiciable, their enforcement is still controversial. This is<br />

evident in defining the nature of the obligations these rights<br />

engender, and in finding and implementing relief to remedy their<br />

violation. I have demonstrated in this book the sources of some of<br />

these controversies, which include the normative (real and perceived)<br />

nature of socio-economic rights. In addition, there is the separation<br />

of powers-based concern. 1 Normatively, the realisation of socioeconomic<br />

rights requires far more resources and yet, procedurally,<br />

the courts may not have the institutional capacity to deal with some<br />

of the issues to which the enforcement of these rights gives rise.<br />

These factors explain not only the approach of the South African<br />

courts in interpreting the obligations engendered by these rights, but<br />

also in determining the remedies that follow their violation. However,<br />

other than the nature of the rights, the approach of the courts, and<br />

particularly that of the Constitutional Court, also has been influenced<br />

by the notion of justice to which the courts are inclined. The<br />

Constitutional Court has inclined more towards the theory of<br />

distributive justice as opposed to corrective justice.<br />

The purpose of this chapter is to draw conclusions emerging from<br />

the discussions of the factors as identified above. It also makes<br />

recommendations on how best the socio-economic rights in the<br />

Constitution can be enforced, and appropriate remedies found for<br />

their violation. The chapter is divided into three sections. The first<br />

section draws conclusions on the way the normative nature of the<br />

rights has influenced the remedies for their violation. The second<br />

section draws conclusions on the impact of separation of powers<br />

based concerns and how these could be overcome. The last section<br />

discusses the influence of the theories of justice in defining<br />

‘appropriate, just and equitable relief’.<br />

1 Ch two.<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!