LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP
LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP
LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Legal nature of socio-economic rights 37<br />
to rely on the independence guaranteed to them by the Constitution,<br />
ensure that justice is done to all without fear, favour or prejudice. 105<br />
It is important to note, however, that for the courts to<br />
successfully discharge their functions they also require a great deal of<br />
support from the other organs of state. If the executive receives court<br />
directions with hostility and unwarranted criticism, the mutual<br />
respect between it and the judiciary will be destroyed. 106 Such<br />
hostility makes it hard for the judiciary to effectively and freely<br />
discharge its functions. This is because the courts are highly<br />
dependent on the executive for survival and enforcement of their<br />
orders as they have neither the power of the sword nor the purse.<br />
Lack of support or hostility from the executive will erode the<br />
legitimacy of the judiciary and deepen the counter-majoritarian<br />
dilemma. 107<br />
The doctrine of constitutionalism is complemented by the longestablished<br />
principle of the rule of law. According to Dicey, the rule<br />
of law comprises three fundamental tenets. The regular law of the<br />
land is supreme, so that individuals should not be subjected to<br />
arbitrary power; state officials are subject to the jurisdiction of the<br />
ordinary courts of the land in the same manner as individuals; and the<br />
constitution is a result of the ordinary law of the land so that courts<br />
should determine the position of the executive and bureaucracy by<br />
principles of private law. 108 In its most elementary form, the rule of<br />
law demands that everything government does must be authorised by<br />
the law.<br />
However, over the years, this principle has seen tremendous<br />
development. It will not allow government conduct to pass simply<br />
because it has been authorised by law if it violates fundamental rights<br />
and liberties. Even in those countries without written constitutions,<br />
like the United Kingdom, the principle of the rule of law has led to<br />
the development of certain restrictions to the exercise of public<br />
power akin to those imposed by constitutions. In contrast, countries<br />
with written constitutions such as South Africa have merely co-opted<br />
the principle of the rule of law by applying it simultaneously with the<br />
105 Sachs (n 79 above) 139.<br />
106 See generally G Kanyeihamba ‘The culture of constitutionalism and the doctrine<br />
of separation of powers’ paper presented at the Public Lecture on State of<br />
Separation of Powers in Uganda, organised by the Human Rights and Peace<br />
Centre, Faculty of Law, Makerere University, 15 March 2007, available at http://<br />
www.huripec.ac.ug/Guest_Lecturers.pdf (accessed 10 October 2007).<br />
107 See M Corbett ‘Human rights: The road ahead’ in C Forsyth & J Schiller (eds)<br />
Human rights: The Cape Town conference (1979) 6.<br />
108<br />
A Dicey Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution (1885) (1982) 1.<br />
See also R Brewer Judicial review in comparative law (1989) 90.