04.06.2014 Views

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Legal nature of socio-economic rights 37<br />

to rely on the independence guaranteed to them by the Constitution,<br />

ensure that justice is done to all without fear, favour or prejudice. 105<br />

It is important to note, however, that for the courts to<br />

successfully discharge their functions they also require a great deal of<br />

support from the other organs of state. If the executive receives court<br />

directions with hostility and unwarranted criticism, the mutual<br />

respect between it and the judiciary will be destroyed. 106 Such<br />

hostility makes it hard for the judiciary to effectively and freely<br />

discharge its functions. This is because the courts are highly<br />

dependent on the executive for survival and enforcement of their<br />

orders as they have neither the power of the sword nor the purse.<br />

Lack of support or hostility from the executive will erode the<br />

legitimacy of the judiciary and deepen the counter-majoritarian<br />

dilemma. 107<br />

The doctrine of constitutionalism is complemented by the longestablished<br />

principle of the rule of law. According to Dicey, the rule<br />

of law comprises three fundamental tenets. The regular law of the<br />

land is supreme, so that individuals should not be subjected to<br />

arbitrary power; state officials are subject to the jurisdiction of the<br />

ordinary courts of the land in the same manner as individuals; and the<br />

constitution is a result of the ordinary law of the land so that courts<br />

should determine the position of the executive and bureaucracy by<br />

principles of private law. 108 In its most elementary form, the rule of<br />

law demands that everything government does must be authorised by<br />

the law.<br />

However, over the years, this principle has seen tremendous<br />

development. It will not allow government conduct to pass simply<br />

because it has been authorised by law if it violates fundamental rights<br />

and liberties. Even in those countries without written constitutions,<br />

like the United Kingdom, the principle of the rule of law has led to<br />

the development of certain restrictions to the exercise of public<br />

power akin to those imposed by constitutions. In contrast, countries<br />

with written constitutions such as South Africa have merely co-opted<br />

the principle of the rule of law by applying it simultaneously with the<br />

105 Sachs (n 79 above) 139.<br />

106 See generally G Kanyeihamba ‘The culture of constitutionalism and the doctrine<br />

of separation of powers’ paper presented at the Public Lecture on State of<br />

Separation of Powers in Uganda, organised by the Human Rights and Peace<br />

Centre, Faculty of Law, Makerere University, 15 March 2007, available at http://<br />

www.huripec.ac.ug/Guest_Lecturers.pdf (accessed 10 October 2007).<br />

107 See M Corbett ‘Human rights: The road ahead’ in C Forsyth & J Schiller (eds)<br />

Human rights: The Cape Town conference (1979) 6.<br />

108<br />

A Dicey Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution (1885) (1982) 1.<br />

See also R Brewer Judicial review in comparative law (1989) 90.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!