04.06.2014 Views

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Legal nature of socio-economic rights 17<br />

direction of the free market should be subjected to the discipline of<br />

the Constitution. The market economy is based on state nonintervention<br />

and endorses those aspects of human rights that protect<br />

individuals against the state. Socio-economic rights are believed to<br />

engender affirmative features, which makes them dangerous to the<br />

market economy. 11 As will be seen later, it is in essence suggested<br />

that civil and political rights are more legitimate and even consistent<br />

with the functioning of the market economy.<br />

In terms of the institutional competence dimension, the judiciary<br />

is viewed as inappropriate to deal with the complex matters of social<br />

justice. This dimension, among others, draws on concerns of<br />

majoritarian democracy. Issues of social justice are viewed as matters<br />

whose determination is within the jurisdiction of the representatives<br />

of the people and not the unelected judges. 12<br />

This chapter analyses the arguments that have been advanced on<br />

the basis of the above objections. It is submitted in this chapter that<br />

the objections to socio-economic rights as justiciable rights are based<br />

on many wrong assumptions about these rights. These objections<br />

overstate characteristics which have moreover been found not to be<br />

exclusive to socio-economic rights. This chapter shows similarities<br />

between civil and political rights and socio-economic rights. This<br />

notwithstanding, the chapter also shows that there are certain<br />

features that are more prominent with respect to socio-economic<br />

rights and which impact on their implementation.<br />

Furthermore, it is submitted in this chapter that the institutional<br />

competence objections are based on a misconception of both<br />

democracy and the separation of powers doctrine. The separation of<br />

powers doctrine has evolved since its conception; it is not possible to<br />

strictly apply the doctrine as initially conceived. And democracy<br />

should be understood beyond the notion of majoritarian democracy.<br />

2.2 Legitimacy-based objections<br />

2.2.1 Human rights engender negative obligations<br />

Human rights are believed to derive from the inherent nature of<br />

human beings and, as fundamental freedoms, are universal and<br />

11 Scott & Macklem (n 9 above) 23.<br />

12 Scott & Macklem (n 9 above) 24. See also P De Vos ‘Pious wishes or directly<br />

enforceable human rights?: Social and economic rights in South Africa's 1996<br />

Constitution’ (1997) South African Journal on Human Rights 67 68.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!