04.06.2014 Views

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 Chapter 2<br />

Maintenance of a health care system requires well co-ordinated<br />

action and community-wide participation. It also requires a great deal<br />

of resources and expertise. It is only the state that is well placed to<br />

meet these requirements. 37 Whereas a violation of this right may<br />

result from state negative interference, it mainly arises from<br />

inaction. There is a legitimate expectation that the state will put in<br />

place a functional health system. This requires the necessary<br />

expertise. The state is also expected to use its resources to build the<br />

necessary infrastructure. By using its expertise, the state will achieve<br />

co-ordination. The state will also use both its coercive and noncoercive<br />

means to achieve community participation where<br />

necessary. 38 All these processes call for a great deal of state positive<br />

action. The same may be said of other socio-economic rights, such as<br />

education, housing, water and food.<br />

Some civil and political rights may require similar measures but in<br />

varying degrees. To realise the right to personal liberty, the state<br />

needs to restrain itself, which imposes a negative duty. However, the<br />

state may also require co-ordinated action to investigate and punish<br />

violators, which imposes a positive duty. This positive duty, however,<br />

may, generally speaking, not require the same level of co-ordination<br />

and community participation as does a health system. In terms of<br />

Sepúlveda’s ‘spectrum’ of obligations, 39 this right will attract more<br />

negative points, while the right to health will attract more positive<br />

points. If these points are expressed in terms of resources, the right<br />

to health care will be more expensive. One may argue that<br />

maintaining a sound police force requires the same level of resources<br />

as maintaining a health care system. Whereas this is true, there is a<br />

major difference: The cost of maintaining a police force will result in<br />

the protection of other rights such as property, life, and protection<br />

from servitude. This results in spreading the costs with a high level of<br />

economies of scale. Maintenance of a health care system is different.<br />

It may protect life but not so many other rights directly, thereby<br />

restricting the economies of scale. This makes the right to health<br />

more expensive.<br />

2.2.2 Universality of human rights<br />

Cranston submits that socio-economic rights are not human rights<br />

because they lack the essential characteristics of universality and<br />

37 There is no doubt that it is a human need that people enjoy good health. It is also<br />

true that this need should be met by the state. It cannot be left exclusively to the<br />

individual without state aid. This is because it requires a great deal of expertise<br />

and resources not at the individual’s disposal.<br />

38 This may include laws that prohibit practices that are harmful to health, and<br />

health education to encourage practices that promote good health.<br />

39 See Sepúlveda (n 23 above) 125. See also Abramovich (n 35 above) 186-187.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!