LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

260 Bibliography Bilchitz, D ‘Giving socio-economic rights teeth: The minimum core and its importance’ (2002) 118 South African Law Journal 484 Bilchitz, D ‘Towards a reasonable approach to the minimum core: Laying the foundations for future socio-economic rights jurisprudence’ (2003) 19 South African Journal on Human Rights 1 Bilchitz, D ‘Placing basic needs at the centre of socio-economic rights jurisprudence’ (2003) 4 ESR Review 2 Bossuyt, M ‘La distinction juridique entre les droits civil et politiques et les droit economiques, sociaux et culturels’ (‘The legal distinction between civil and political rights and economic, social and cultural rights’) (1975) 8 Revue des Droits de l’Homme (Human Rights Journal) 783 Brent, K; Marshall, J; Picou, J & Schlichtman, R ‘Technological disasters, litigation stress and the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms’ (2002) 26 Law and Policy 289 Bork, R ‘Neutral principles and some First Amendment problems’ (1971) 47 Indiana Law Review 1 Budlender, G ‘Access to courts’ (2004) 121 South African Law Journal 339 Budlender, G ‘The role of the courts in achieving the transformative potential of socio-economic rights’ (2007) 8 ESR Review 9–11 Cappelletti, M ‘Judicial review of the constitutionality of state action: Its expansion and legitimacy’ (1992) 2 Journal of South African Law 256 Capelletti, M ‘The future of legal education: A comparative perspective’ (1992) 8 South African Journal on Human Rights 1 Carr, L ‘Wyatt v Stickney: A landmark decision’ (2004) Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Newsletter Cassels, J ‘Judicial activism and public interest litigation in India: Attempting the impossible’ (1989) American Journal of Comparative Law 495 Chapman, A ‘A new approach to monitoring the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ (1995) International Commission of Jurists: The Review No 55 23 Chaskalson, A; Mohamed, I; Langa, P; Van Heerden, H & Coebett, M ‘The legal system in South Africa 1960 – 1994’ Representations to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (1998) 15 South African Law Journal 21 Chaskalson, A ‘Law in a changing society’ (1989) 5 South African Journal on Human Rights 293 Chayes, A ‘The role of the judge in public law litigation’ (1979) 89 Harvard Law Review 1281 Chenwi, L & Mbazira, C ‘The Draft Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ (2006) ESR Review 9 Christmas, A ‘Property rights of landowners vs socio-economic rights of occupiers’ (2004) 5 ESR Review 11
Bibliography 261 Corbett, M ‘Representations to the Truth and Reconciliation commission’ (1998) 115 South African Law Journal 17 Cowling, G ‘Judges and the protection of human rights in South Africa: Articulating the inarticulate premise’ (1987) South African Journal on Human Rights 177 Creamer, K ‘The implications of socio-economic rights jurisprudence for government planning and budgeting: The case of children’s socioeconomic rights’ (2004) 2 Law, Democracy and Development 221 Currie, I ‘Judicious avoidance’ in (1999) 15 South African Journal on Human Rights 138 Davis, D ‘Adjudicating the socio-economic rights in the South African Constitution: Towards “deference lite”?’ (2006) 22 South African Journal on Human Rights 301 Davis, D ‘The case against the inclusion of socio-economic demands in a bill of rights except as directive principles’ (1992) 8 South African Journal on Human Rights 475 Davis, D ‘Democracy: Its influence upon the process of constitutional interpretation’ (1994) 10 South African Journal on Human Rights 103 Davis, D ‘Democracy and integrity: Making sense of the Constitution’ (1998) 14 South African Journal on Human Rights 127 Davis, D ‘Socio-economic rights in South Africa: The record of the Constitutional Court after ten years’ (2004) 5 ESR Review 3 Dennis, J & Stewart, P ‘Justiciability of economic, social and cultural rights: Should there be an international complaints mechanism to adjudicate the rights to food, water, housing and health?’ (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law 462 De Villiers, B ‘Socio-economic rights in a new constitution: Critical evaluation of recommendations of the South African Law Commission’ (1992) 3 Journal of South African Law 421 De Visser, J ‘A perspective on local government’s role in realising the right to housing and the answer of the Grootboom judgment’ (2003) 7 Law, Democracy and Development 201 De Vos, P ‘Grootboom, the right of access to housing and substantive equality as contextual fairness’ (2001) 17 South African Journal on Human Rights 258 De Vos, P ‘Pious wishes or directly enforceable rights? Social and economic rights in South Africa’s 1996 Constitution’ (1997) South African Journal on Human Rights 67 De Vos, P ‘The economic and social rights of children in South Africa’s transitional Constitution’ (1995) 2 SA Public Law 233 De Waal, J & Erasmus, G ‘The constitutional jurisprudence of South African courts on the application, interpretation and limitation of fundamental rights during the transition’ (1996) 7 Stellenbosch Law Review 179
Page 1 and 2:
LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ACKNOWLED
Page 5 and 6:
PREFACE As an international LLM Stu
Page 7 and 8:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to exp
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The inclusio
Page 11 and 12:
Introduction 3 lay the foundation f
Page 13 and 14:
Introduction 5 positive obligations
Page 15 and 16:
Introduction 7 been very careful no
Page 17 and 18:
Introduction 9 justice theory takes
Page 19 and 20:
Introduction 11 jurisdictions. Many
Page 21 and 22:
Introduction 13 placed on general w
Page 23 and 24:
CHAPTER 2 THE LEGAL NATURE OF SOCIO
Page 25 and 26:
Legal nature of socio-economic righ
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59:
Page 62 and 63:
54 Chapter 3 appropriate means. Sim
Page 64 and 65:
56 Chapter 3 which he refers to as
Page 66 and 67:
58 Chapter 3 dialysis treatment to
Page 68 and 69:
60 Chapter 3 Though it is not withi
Page 70 and 71:
62 Chapter 3 number of rights in IC
Page 72 and 73:
64 Chapter 3 within the prevalent c
Page 74 and 75:
66 Chapter 3 the state cannot affor
Page 76 and 77:
68 Chapter 3 refusal to impose an a
Page 78 and 79:
70 Chapter 3 cases in which the cou
Page 80 and 81:
72 Chapter 3 enjoy all rights there
Page 82 and 83:
74 Chapter 3 formalistic and abstra
Page 84 and 85:
76 Chapter 3 behind the protection
Page 86 and 87:
78 Chapter 3 been able to determine
Page 88 and 89:
80 Chapter 3 27(1) are to have ‘a
Page 90 and 91:
82 Chapter 3 by the political organ
Page 92 and 93:
84 Chapter 3 The subsection must be
Page 94 and 95:
86 Chapter 3 dealing with sections
Page 96 and 97:
88 Chapter 3 arising from the exclu
Page 98 and 99:
90 Chapter 3 justifiable in an open
Page 100 and 101:
92 Chapter 3 The phrase ‘within a
Page 102 and 103:
94 Chapter 3 increase the levels of
Page 104 and 105:
96 Chapter 3 to withdraw from its r
Page 106 and 107:
98 Chapter 3 The problem with the C
Page 108 and 109:
100 Chapter 3 All that the courts w
Page 110 and 111:
102 Chapter 3 justify its failure t
Page 112 and 113:
104 Chapter 4 These theories of jus
Page 114 and 115:
106 Chapter 4 perceives the law as
Page 116 and 117:
108 Chapter 4 difference whether a
Page 118 and 119:
110 Chapter 4 Traditionally, the vi
Page 120 and 121:
112 Chapter 4 the wellbeing of all
Page 122 and 123:
114 Chapter 4 that may be short of
Page 124 and 125:
116 Chapter 4 the victim's needs sh
Page 126 and 127:
118 Chapter 4 doing so appears to d
Page 128 and 129:
120 Chapter 4 by its results. Those
Page 130 and 131:
122 Chapter 4 government that bears
Page 132 and 133:
124 Chapter 4 On the basis of the a
Page 134 and 135:
126 Chapter 4 realise that concept.
Page 136 and 137:
128 Chapter 4 ‘appropriate, just
Page 138 and 139:
130 Chapter 4 It is at this point t
Page 140 and 141:
132 Chapter 5 of the defendant too
Page 142 and 143:
134 Chapter 5 enforcement of these
Page 144 and 145:
136 Chapter 5 courts are constituti
Page 146 and 147:
138 Chapter 5 rights have been viol
Page 148 and 149:
140 Chapter 5 the law is ‘restora
Page 150 and 151:
142 Chapter 5 unfit for cabin work,
Page 152 and 153:
144 Chapter 5 measured by the yards
Page 154 and 155:
146 Chapter 5 (defendant) to determ
Page 156 and 157:
148 Chapter 5 has left open the pos
Page 158 and 159:
150 Chapter 5 without the need for
Page 160 and 161:
152 Chapter 5 demolishing their sha
Page 162 and 163:
154 Chapter 5 and power to bring an
Page 164 and 165:
156 Chapter 5 between the parties.
Page 166 and 167:
158 Chapter 5 such as those where t
Page 168 and 169:
160 Chapter 5 is in circumstances w
Page 170 and 171:
162 Chapter 5 concluded that it was
Page 172 and 173:
164 Chapter 5 because of the immens
Page 174 and 175:
166 Chapter 6 Constitutional Court
Page 176 and 177:
168 Chapter 6 actually committed or
Page 178 and 179:
170 Chapter 6 unlawful conduct. In
Page 180 and 181:
172 Chapter 6 is not prepared to ab
Page 182 and 183:
174 Chapter 6 (d) that the applican
Page 184 and 185:
176 Chapter 6 difficulties aired in
Page 186 and 187:
178 Chapter 6 It is because of thes
Page 188 and 189:
180 Chapter 6 which forced the cour
Page 190 and 191:
182 Chapter 6 institutions whose re
Page 192 and 193:
184 Chapter 6 acceptable to all the
Page 194 and 195:
186 Chapter 6 down the normative st
Page 196 and 197:
188 Chapter 6 Nonetheless, the open
Page 198 and 199:
190 Chapter 6 because of the qualit
Page 200 and 201:
192 Chapter 6 result in a relief ac
Page 202 and 203:
194 Chapter 6 Nonetheless, it shoul
Page 204 and 205:
196 Chapter 6 Nova Scotia. 154 The
Page 206 and 207:
198 Chapter 6 Additionally, such co
Page 208 and 209:
200 Chapter 6 dealing with … righ
Page 210 and 211:
202 Chapter 6 Management and Treatm
Page 212 and 213:
204 Chapter 6 the most appropriate
Page 214 and 215:
206 Chapter 6 for the structural in
Page 216 and 217:
208 Chapter 6 have not obtained the
Page 218 and 219: 210 Chapter 6 further enabled the C
Page 220 and 221: 212 Chapter 6 enforcement of the co
Page 222 and 223: 214 Chapter 6 aimed at procuring th
Page 224 and 225: 216 Chapter 6 spheres of government
Page 226 and 227: 218 Chapter 6 independence in struc
Page 228 and 229: 220 Chapter 6 6.6.4 Reasoned decisi
Page 230 and 231: 222 Chapter 6 justified if the reme
Page 232 and 233: 224 Chapter 6 This could be followe
Page 235 and 236: CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION Although the S
Page 237 and 238: Conclusions and recommendations 229
Page 249 and 250: TABLE OF CASES African Commission o
Page 251 and 252: Table of cases 243 City Council of
Page 253 and 254: Table of cases 245 Permanent Secret
Page 255 and 256: Table of cases 247 Marbury v Madiso
Page 257 and 258: Table of international treaties and
Page 259 and 260: Bibliography 251 Brand, D & Heyns,
Page 261 and 262: Bibliography 253 Locke, J (1967) Tw
Page 263 and 264: Bibliography 255 Zakrzewski, R (200
Page 265 and 266: Bibliography 257 Rendering justice
Page 267: Bibliography 259 Sachs, A ‘The ju
Page 271 and 272: Bibliography 263 Gready, P & Kgalem
Page 273 and 274: Bibliography 265 Moore, B ‘Commun
Page 275 and 276: Bibliography 267 Schwarzschild, M
Page 277 and 278: Bibliography 269 Water Delivery in
Page 279 and 280: Bibliography 271 Garret, B Structur
Page 281: Bibliography 273 Kanyeihamba, G ‘
show all

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?