LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

262 Bibliography Dlamini, C ‘The South African Law Commission’s Working Paper on group and human rights: Towards a bill of rights for South Africa’ (1990) S A Public Law 96 Donald, L ‘Thinking about constitutionalism at the start of the twenty-first century’ (2000) 30 The Journal of Federalism 115 Donnelly, J ‘The relative universality of human rights’ (2007) 29 Human Rights Quarterly 281 Dugard, J ‘Court of first instance? Towards a pro-poor jurisdiction for the South African Constitutional Court’ in (2006) 22 South African Journal on Human Rights 261 Eide, A ‘Realisation of social and economic rights and the minimum threshold approach’ (1989) 10 Human Rights Law Journal 35 Epstein, A ‘Judicial review: Beckoning on two kinds of error’ (1985) 4 Cato Journal 711 Eisenberg, T & Yeazell, S ‘The ordinary and the extraordinary in institutional litigation’ (1980) 93 Harvard Law Review 465 Fagan, A ‘In defence of the obvious – Ordinary meaning and the identification of constitutional rules’ (1995) 11 South African Journal on Human Rights 545 Fiss, O ‘Foreword: The forms of justice’ (1979) 93 Harvard Law Review 1 Fiss, O ‘Against settlement’ (1984) 93 Yale Law Journal 1073 Fletcher, W ‘The discretionary Constitution: Institutional remedies and judicial legitimacy’ (1982) Yale Law Journal 635 Forsyth, C ‘Interpreting a bill of rights: The task of a reformed judiciary’ (1991) 7 South African Journal on Human Rights 1 Forsyth, C & Elliot, M ‘The legitimacy of judicial review’ (2003) Public Law 286 Fredman, S ‘Providing equality: Substantive equality and the positive duty to provide’ (2005) 21 South African Journal on Human Rights 163 Freeden, M ‘Human rights and welfare: A communitarian view’ (1990) Ethics 489 Fuller, L ‘The forms and limits of adjudication’ (1978) 92 Harvard Law Review 353 Frug, E ‘The judicial power of the purse’ (1978) University of Pennsylvania Law Review 715 Gabriel, A ‘Socio-economic rights in the Bill of Rights: Comparative lessons from India’ (1997) 1 The Human Rights and Constitutional Law Journal of Southern Africa 9 Gewirtz, P ‘Remedies and resistance’ (1983) 92 Yale Law Journal 585 Gleick, P ‘The human right to water’ (1998) 1 Water Policy 487
Bibliography 263 Gready, P & Kgalema, L ‘Magistrates under apartheid: A case study of the politicisation of justice and complicity in human rights abuse’ (2003) 19 South African Journal on Human Rights 141 Haysom, N ‘Constitutionalism, majoritarian democracy and socio-economic rights’ (1992) 8 South African Journal on Human Rights 451 Henrard, K ‘Post-apartheid South Africa’s democratic transformation process: Redress of the past, reconciliation and “unity in diversity”’ (2002) 3 The Global Review of Ethno Politics 18 Heywood, M ‘Preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission in South Africa: Background, strategies and outcomes of the Treatment Action Campaign's case against the Minister of Health’ (2003) 19 South African Journal on Human Rights 278 Heywood, M ‘Contempt or compliance? The TAC case after the Constitutional Court judgment’ (2003) 4(1) ESR Review 7 Hoexter, C ‘The future of judicial review in South African administrative law’ (2000) 117 South African Law Journal 484 Hunt, P ‘Reclaiming economic, social and cultural rights’ (1993) 1 Waikato LR 141 Iles, K ‘Limiting socio-economic rights: Beyond the internal limitation clauses’ (2004) 20 South African Journal on Human Rights 448 Iles, K ‘A fresh look at limitations: Unpacking section 36’ (2007) 23 South African Journal on Human Rights 68 Klare, K ‘Legal culture and transformative constitutionalism’ (1998) 14 South African Journal of Human Rights 147 Kenneth, R ‘Defending economic, social and cultural rights: Practical issues faced by an international human rights organisation’ (2004) 26 Human Rights Quarterly 63 Keating, G ‘Distributive and corrective justice in tort law of accidents’ (2000) 74 Southern California Law Review 193 Khoza, S ‘The importance of a dialogue on strategies to promote socioeconomic rights in South Africa’ (2006) 7 ESR Review 6 Klaaren, J ‘The structure of government in the 1996 South African Constitution: Putting democracy back into human rights’ (1997) 13 South African Journal on Human Rights 3 Klimchuk, D ‘On the autonomy of corrective justice’ (2003) 23 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 49 Klug, H ‘Introducing the devil: An institutional analysis of the power of constitutional review’ (1997) 13 South African Journal on Human Rights 185 Kroeze, I ‘Doing things with values II: The case of ubuntu’ (2002) 13 Stellenbosch Law Review 252 Kroeze, I ‘Doing things with values: The role of constitutional values in constitutional interpretation’ (2001) 11 Stellenbosch Law Review 265
Page 1 and 2:
LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ACKNOWLED
Page 5 and 6:
PREFACE As an international LLM Stu
Page 7 and 8:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to exp
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The inclusio
Page 11 and 12:
Introduction 3 lay the foundation f
Page 13 and 14:
Introduction 5 positive obligations
Page 15 and 16:
Introduction 7 been very careful no
Page 17 and 18:
Introduction 9 justice theory takes
Page 19 and 20:
Introduction 11 jurisdictions. Many
Page 21 and 22:
Introduction 13 placed on general w
Page 23 and 24:
CHAPTER 2 THE LEGAL NATURE OF SOCIO
Page 25 and 26:
Legal nature of socio-economic righ
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59:
Page 62 and 63:
54 Chapter 3 appropriate means. Sim
Page 64 and 65:
56 Chapter 3 which he refers to as
Page 66 and 67:
58 Chapter 3 dialysis treatment to
Page 68 and 69:
60 Chapter 3 Though it is not withi
Page 70 and 71:
62 Chapter 3 number of rights in IC
Page 72 and 73:
64 Chapter 3 within the prevalent c
Page 74 and 75:
66 Chapter 3 the state cannot affor
Page 76 and 77:
68 Chapter 3 refusal to impose an a
Page 78 and 79:
70 Chapter 3 cases in which the cou
Page 80 and 81:
72 Chapter 3 enjoy all rights there
Page 82 and 83:
74 Chapter 3 formalistic and abstra
Page 84 and 85:
76 Chapter 3 behind the protection
Page 86 and 87:
78 Chapter 3 been able to determine
Page 88 and 89:
80 Chapter 3 27(1) are to have ‘a
Page 90 and 91:
82 Chapter 3 by the political organ
Page 92 and 93:
84 Chapter 3 The subsection must be
Page 94 and 95:
86 Chapter 3 dealing with sections
Page 96 and 97:
88 Chapter 3 arising from the exclu
Page 98 and 99:
90 Chapter 3 justifiable in an open
Page 100 and 101:
92 Chapter 3 The phrase ‘within a
Page 102 and 103:
94 Chapter 3 increase the levels of
Page 104 and 105:
96 Chapter 3 to withdraw from its r
Page 106 and 107:
98 Chapter 3 The problem with the C
Page 108 and 109:
100 Chapter 3 All that the courts w
Page 110 and 111:
102 Chapter 3 justify its failure t
Page 112 and 113:
104 Chapter 4 These theories of jus
Page 114 and 115:
106 Chapter 4 perceives the law as
Page 116 and 117:
108 Chapter 4 difference whether a
Page 118 and 119:
110 Chapter 4 Traditionally, the vi
Page 120 and 121:
112 Chapter 4 the wellbeing of all
Page 122 and 123:
114 Chapter 4 that may be short of
Page 124 and 125:
116 Chapter 4 the victim's needs sh
Page 126 and 127:
118 Chapter 4 doing so appears to d
Page 128 and 129:
120 Chapter 4 by its results. Those
Page 130 and 131:
122 Chapter 4 government that bears
Page 132 and 133:
124 Chapter 4 On the basis of the a
Page 134 and 135:
126 Chapter 4 realise that concept.
Page 136 and 137:
128 Chapter 4 ‘appropriate, just
Page 138 and 139:
130 Chapter 4 It is at this point t
Page 140 and 141:
132 Chapter 5 of the defendant too
Page 142 and 143:
134 Chapter 5 enforcement of these
Page 144 and 145:
136 Chapter 5 courts are constituti
Page 146 and 147:
138 Chapter 5 rights have been viol
Page 148 and 149:
140 Chapter 5 the law is ‘restora
Page 150 and 151:
142 Chapter 5 unfit for cabin work,
Page 152 and 153:
144 Chapter 5 measured by the yards
Page 154 and 155:
146 Chapter 5 (defendant) to determ
Page 156 and 157:
148 Chapter 5 has left open the pos
Page 158 and 159:
150 Chapter 5 without the need for
Page 160 and 161:
152 Chapter 5 demolishing their sha
Page 162 and 163:
154 Chapter 5 and power to bring an
Page 164 and 165:
156 Chapter 5 between the parties.
Page 166 and 167:
158 Chapter 5 such as those where t
Page 168 and 169:
160 Chapter 5 is in circumstances w
Page 170 and 171:
162 Chapter 5 concluded that it was
Page 172 and 173:
164 Chapter 5 because of the immens
Page 174 and 175:
166 Chapter 6 Constitutional Court
Page 176 and 177:
168 Chapter 6 actually committed or
Page 178 and 179:
170 Chapter 6 unlawful conduct. In
Page 180 and 181:
172 Chapter 6 is not prepared to ab
Page 182 and 183:
174 Chapter 6 (d) that the applican
Page 184 and 185:
176 Chapter 6 difficulties aired in
Page 186 and 187:
178 Chapter 6 It is because of thes
Page 188 and 189:
180 Chapter 6 which forced the cour
Page 190 and 191:
182 Chapter 6 institutions whose re
Page 192 and 193:
184 Chapter 6 acceptable to all the
Page 194 and 195:
186 Chapter 6 down the normative st
Page 196 and 197:
188 Chapter 6 Nonetheless, the open
Page 198 and 199:
190 Chapter 6 because of the qualit
Page 200 and 201:
192 Chapter 6 result in a relief ac
Page 202 and 203:
194 Chapter 6 Nonetheless, it shoul
Page 204 and 205:
196 Chapter 6 Nova Scotia. 154 The
Page 206 and 207:
198 Chapter 6 Additionally, such co
Page 208 and 209:
200 Chapter 6 dealing with … righ
Page 210 and 211:
202 Chapter 6 Management and Treatm
Page 212 and 213:
204 Chapter 6 the most appropriate
Page 214 and 215:
206 Chapter 6 for the structural in
Page 216 and 217:
208 Chapter 6 have not obtained the
Page 218 and 219:
210 Chapter 6 further enabled the C
Page 220 and 221: 212 Chapter 6 enforcement of the co
Page 222 and 223: 214 Chapter 6 aimed at procuring th
Page 224 and 225: 216 Chapter 6 spheres of government
Page 226 and 227: 218 Chapter 6 independence in struc
Page 228 and 229: 220 Chapter 6 6.6.4 Reasoned decisi
Page 230 and 231: 222 Chapter 6 justified if the reme
Page 232 and 233: 224 Chapter 6 This could be followe
Page 235 and 236: CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION Although the S
Page 237 and 238: Conclusions and recommendations 229
Page 249 and 250: TABLE OF CASES African Commission o
Page 251 and 252: Table of cases 243 City Council of
Page 253 and 254: Table of cases 245 Permanent Secret
Page 255 and 256: Table of cases 247 Marbury v Madiso
Page 257 and 258: Table of international treaties and
Page 259 and 260: Bibliography 251 Brand, D & Heyns,
Page 261 and 262: Bibliography 253 Locke, J (1967) Tw
Page 263 and 264: Bibliography 255 Zakrzewski, R (200
Page 265 and 266: Bibliography 257 Rendering justice
Page 267 and 268: Bibliography 259 Sachs, A ‘The ju
Page 269: Bibliography 261 Corbett, M ‘Repr
Page 273 and 274: Bibliography 265 Moore, B ‘Commun
Page 275 and 276: Bibliography 267 Schwarzschild, M
Page 277 and 278: Bibliography 269 Water Delivery in
Page 279 and 280: Bibliography 271 Garret, B Structur
Page 281: Bibliography 273 Kanyeihamba, G ‘
show all

LITIGATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA - PULP

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?