Development of Policy, Legal, and Insitutional Framework for - ppiaf
Development of Policy, Legal, and Insitutional Framework for - ppiaf
Development of Policy, Legal, and Insitutional Framework for - ppiaf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>, <strong>Legal</strong>, & Institutional <strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong> the PPP Program in Malawi<br />
Final Report<br />
any attempt by an Authority to control Sub-Contractors is not advised <strong>and</strong> is in most<br />
cases also unnecessary. In certain limited cases, there may be overriding reasons why an<br />
Authority should have a degree <strong>of</strong> control over sub-contractors, <strong>for</strong> example projects in<br />
which there are national security or public interest concerns.<br />
As is the case with sub-contractors, Authorities generally should not seek control over<br />
the employees <strong>of</strong> the Contractor or its Sub-Contractors. Exceptions can be appropriate<br />
in defense projects, prison projects, school projects, <strong>and</strong> other projects in which there is<br />
an overriding public concern regarding what kinds <strong>of</strong> people are involved in service<br />
delivery. In projects requiring a security clearance <strong>for</strong> persons providing services, the<br />
Contractor should consider that such clearances may be outside the Authority’s control.<br />
Assignment & Change <strong>of</strong> Ownership<br />
As many PPP projects involve the construction <strong>and</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> infrastructure, contract<br />
periods can be very long, commonly 15-20 years <strong>and</strong> in some cases as long as 40 years.<br />
In view <strong>of</strong> this, some changes in ownership on the part <strong>of</strong> the Contractor are possible,<br />
even likely <strong>and</strong> the Authority should take care to anticipate such changes in drafting the<br />
wording <strong>for</strong> the contract. Similarly, over such a long period <strong>of</strong> time the business pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Contractor may change, making assignment <strong>of</strong> certain service delivery tasks to<br />
other entities a necessity. The contract should, there<strong>for</strong>e include provisions that will<br />
allow <strong>for</strong> assignment <strong>of</strong> tasks under certain specified conditions.<br />
Certain restrictions will be in the contract, such as the Contractor may not assign,<br />
novate, or transfer its rights except as provided in the lenders’ security agreement. If the<br />
lenders appoint a new Contractor, the rights <strong>of</strong> the original Contractor should be<br />
transferred. In the Contract there will also be restrictions on the Authority’s right to<br />
transfer its rights or obligations without the consent <strong>of</strong> the Contractor. Any attempt to<br />
provide restrictions on the lenders in the Contract should be met with concern. It is very<br />
difficult to restrict the identity <strong>of</strong> lenders or their assigns, especially when bond<br />
financing is involved.<br />
Changes <strong>of</strong> ownership can be <strong>of</strong> considerable concern to Authorities when the<br />
ownership pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the Contractor is changed. Any attempt to restrict the transfer <strong>of</strong><br />
ownership in the Contractor is likely to be met with considerable resistance, so the best<br />
an Authority can expect to achieve is a requirement to be notified <strong>of</strong> such changes.<br />
Treatment <strong>of</strong> Assets at End <strong>of</strong> Service Period<br />
There are essentially two options <strong>for</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> assets as the end <strong>of</strong> the service period:<br />
The Authority takes control <strong>of</strong> the assets on expiration <strong>of</strong> the Contract. This includes<br />
assets <strong>for</strong> which the long-term public sector dem<strong>and</strong> is clear, <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> which there is no<br />
practical alternative use <strong>of</strong> the assets; <strong>and</strong><br />
The residual value <strong>of</strong> the assets is transferred to the Contractor. These kinds <strong>of</strong> assets<br />
are usually generic <strong>and</strong> have alternative use outside the public sector.<br />
THE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS 213