02.09.2014 Views

(MERAF) for the Base Metals Smelting Sector - CCME

(MERAF) for the Base Metals Smelting Sector - CCME

(MERAF) for the Base Metals Smelting Sector - CCME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

− The EPA has started developing particulate matter emission standards<br />

<strong>for</strong> primary copper smelters. The National Emission Standards <strong>for</strong><br />

Primary Copper Smelters were proposed in 1998 and a series of<br />

amendments were proposed on June 2000. US EPA personnel<br />

reported that <strong>the</strong> final Rule package is in Washington Headquarters <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Administrator’s signature. Dates of signature and publication in <strong>the</strong><br />

Federal Register are unknown.<br />

− Under <strong>the</strong> U.S. EPA’s Risk Management Planning (RMP) Rule [s112 of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Clean Air Act Amendments, 1990], sulphur dioxide is listed as a<br />

toxic substance with a threshold quantity of 5,000 lbs. There<strong>for</strong>e, those<br />

facilities with <strong>the</strong> potential of hazardous emissions or releases, covered<br />

by <strong>the</strong> RMP rule, must develop and implement a risk management<br />

program and maintain documentation of <strong>the</strong> program at <strong>the</strong> site. The<br />

program includes an analysis of <strong>the</strong> potential off-site consequences of<br />

an accidental release, a 5-year accident history, a release prevention<br />

program and an emergency response program. With <strong>the</strong> RMP rule,<br />

releases of sulphur dioxide will be more closely monitored.<br />

This summary presents controls and standards in existence in Canada and <strong>the</strong><br />

United States. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>MERAF</strong> report, standards from <strong>the</strong> World Bank, <strong>the</strong> United<br />

Nations Economic Commission <strong>for</strong> Europe, European Union, Australia, and many<br />

European countries are also presented and discussed.<br />

An analysis was conducted by Hatch Associates to identify where fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

reductions could be made in releases by <strong>the</strong> application of technically feasible<br />

methods. Two time periods were chosen <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysis: By 2008 and Beyond<br />

2008. These dates correspond to <strong>the</strong> dates specified in Recommendation #1 of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Strategic Options Report <strong>for</strong> <strong>Base</strong> <strong>Metals</strong> <strong>Smelting</strong> <strong>Sector</strong> dealing with<br />

Release Reduction Targets and Schedules. For <strong>the</strong> purposes of this report, <strong>the</strong><br />

“Beyond 2008” option is given a finite time frame of “By 2015”.<br />

The following assumptions were made <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> reduction analysis:<br />

• similar production levels of metals in Canada;<br />

• existing facilities continue operations;<br />

• additional air pollution control applied to some facilities (e.g., installed or<br />

upgraded particulate control);<br />

• air pollution prevention process applied to some facilities (e.g., changes<br />

in smelting processes).<br />

<strong>Base</strong>d on a review of release data, <strong>the</strong> focus was placed on <strong>the</strong> following six<br />

facilities representing a significant portion of <strong>the</strong> releases from this sector:<br />

• Hudson Bay Mining and <strong>Smelting</strong>;<br />

• Inco Thompson;<br />

• Inco Copper Cliff;<br />

xvi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!