(MERAF) for the Base Metals Smelting Sector - CCME
(MERAF) for the Base Metals Smelting Sector - CCME
(MERAF) for the Base Metals Smelting Sector - CCME
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.4. Options and Preliminary Cost Estimates <strong>for</strong> Emission<br />
Reduction 160,161<br />
In its report on <strong>the</strong> releases from <strong>Base</strong> <strong>Metals</strong> Smelters, Hatch Associates<br />
conducted an analysis to identify where fur<strong>the</strong>r reductions could be made in<br />
releases by <strong>the</strong> application of technically feasible methods. Two time periods<br />
were chosen <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysis: By 2008 and Beyond 2008. These dates<br />
correspond to <strong>the</strong> dates specified in Recommendation #1 of <strong>the</strong> Strategic<br />
Options Report dealing with Release Reduction Targets and Schedules.<br />
However, <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> purposes of this report, <strong>the</strong> “Beyond 2008” option is given a<br />
finite time frame of “By 2015”.<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r report prepared by Hatch Associates was tabled at <strong>the</strong> National<br />
Workshop on Environmental Per<strong>for</strong>mance of <strong>Base</strong> <strong>Metals</strong> <strong>Smelting</strong> <strong>Sector</strong> held<br />
in Ottawa, Ontario on March 7 and 8, 2002. Comments were received from <strong>the</strong><br />
multi-stakeholder participants at and subsequent to <strong>the</strong> workshop. All comments<br />
received were considered and many of <strong>the</strong> comments have been incorporated<br />
into <strong>the</strong> <strong>MERAF</strong>. Some issues could not be resolved and a list of topics 162 <strong>for</strong><br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r discussion by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Base</strong> <strong>Metals</strong> Smelter Environmental Multi-stakeholder<br />
Advisory Group (BEMAG) was prepared.<br />
<strong>Base</strong>d on an analysis of release data (both absolute and EPI) as presented in<br />
section 3, <strong>the</strong> focus was placed on <strong>the</strong> following facilities due to <strong>the</strong>ir position as<br />
<strong>the</strong> major releasers:<br />
• Hudson Bay Mining and <strong>Smelting</strong>;<br />
• Inco Thompson;<br />
• Inco Copper Cliff;<br />
• Falconbridge Sudbury;<br />
• Noranda Horne; and<br />
• Noranda Gaspé.<br />
The economic data presented in this report is based on <strong>the</strong> sector as it was in<br />
1998. It should be noted that <strong>the</strong> sector has made various changes to processes<br />
and controls since that time.<br />
These changes include:<br />
160 Hatch Associates, Review of Environmental Releases <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Base</strong> <strong>Metals</strong> <strong>Smelting</strong> <strong>Sector</strong>,<br />
prepared <strong>for</strong> Environment Canada, dated November 2000<br />
161 Hatch Associates Implementation Scenario <strong>for</strong> Proposed Emission Standards <strong>for</strong> Particulate<br />
Matter and Sulphur Dioxide <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Base</strong> <strong>Metals</strong> <strong>Smelting</strong> <strong>Sector</strong>, prepared <strong>for</strong> Environment<br />
Canada, dated May 2002.<br />
162 Personal communication from Dianne Rubinoff (Hatch Associates) to Patrick Finlay,<br />
(Environment Canada) April 9, 2002<br />
169