10.11.2014 Views

POST GAMES REPORT - Commonwealth Games Federation

POST GAMES REPORT - Commonwealth Games Federation

POST GAMES REPORT - Commonwealth Games Federation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• There was very late agreement on the matrix of handing/<br />

taking over of venues leading to inconsistency and at times<br />

disagreement. The complete matrix of handing/taking over<br />

of venues and responsibilities of different stakeholders<br />

should be finalised at least 18 months before the <strong>Games</strong><br />

• Delegation of authority at the venue level to solve<br />

operational issues and ensure budgetary responsibilities<br />

for key operational gaps and contingencies should be<br />

in place when the venue teams are operational at the<br />

venues<br />

• The engagement of the Special Advisors over the last two<br />

months to solve major outstanding delivery problems<br />

with the venues was made far more effective by having<br />

the Venue Administrators and Venue Operations Teams in<br />

place at the venues. While conditions for the venue teams<br />

in July/August were far than ideal, venue teams were left<br />

with the task of getting the venues completed. As a result,<br />

they could not spend the required time on the operational<br />

planning for the <strong>Games</strong> Time as having them at the venue<br />

was crucial to expediting final delivery<br />

• The planning for bump out/logistics capture and wind-up<br />

of the venues was only planned at the very last moment. Early<br />

planning will ensure higher capture of valuable assets and a<br />

better plan of the retention/dismissal of staff across all FAs<br />

• Waiting for approvals and decisions was the single largest<br />

contributor for the slow pace of work in a non-synergised<br />

environment leading to avoidable delays, and at times,<br />

duplication of effort<br />

• The Overlays scoping should have been completed by 3<br />

October 2008 whereas it commenced in right earnest<br />

in March-April 2009. Further, Overlays contracts should<br />

have been placed by January 2009 whereas these were<br />

actually concluded on May-June 2010 with a delay of 16<br />

months. These delays left no time to look for economical<br />

and operational alternatives. It is necessary that the time<br />

frame for scoping and contracting should be adhered to in<br />

these cases<br />

• It is necessary to have a separate Overlays FA with adequate<br />

staffing in phases, i.e., scoping, budgeting, tendering and<br />

contracting and implementation stages. Simultaneously,<br />

infrastructure support such as computers with software<br />

with CAD facility, A0, A3 and other printers, heavy duty<br />

copiers, and Project Management Primavera software are<br />

116<br />

<strong>POST</strong> <strong>GAMES</strong> <strong>REPORT</strong> DELHI 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!