POST GAMES REPORT - Commonwealth Games Federation
POST GAMES REPORT - Commonwealth Games Federation
POST GAMES REPORT - Commonwealth Games Federation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• There was very late agreement on the matrix of handing/<br />
taking over of venues leading to inconsistency and at times<br />
disagreement. The complete matrix of handing/taking over<br />
of venues and responsibilities of different stakeholders<br />
should be finalised at least 18 months before the <strong>Games</strong><br />
• Delegation of authority at the venue level to solve<br />
operational issues and ensure budgetary responsibilities<br />
for key operational gaps and contingencies should be<br />
in place when the venue teams are operational at the<br />
venues<br />
• The engagement of the Special Advisors over the last two<br />
months to solve major outstanding delivery problems<br />
with the venues was made far more effective by having<br />
the Venue Administrators and Venue Operations Teams in<br />
place at the venues. While conditions for the venue teams<br />
in July/August were far than ideal, venue teams were left<br />
with the task of getting the venues completed. As a result,<br />
they could not spend the required time on the operational<br />
planning for the <strong>Games</strong> Time as having them at the venue<br />
was crucial to expediting final delivery<br />
• The planning for bump out/logistics capture and wind-up<br />
of the venues was only planned at the very last moment. Early<br />
planning will ensure higher capture of valuable assets and a<br />
better plan of the retention/dismissal of staff across all FAs<br />
• Waiting for approvals and decisions was the single largest<br />
contributor for the slow pace of work in a non-synergised<br />
environment leading to avoidable delays, and at times,<br />
duplication of effort<br />
• The Overlays scoping should have been completed by 3<br />
October 2008 whereas it commenced in right earnest<br />
in March-April 2009. Further, Overlays contracts should<br />
have been placed by January 2009 whereas these were<br />
actually concluded on May-June 2010 with a delay of 16<br />
months. These delays left no time to look for economical<br />
and operational alternatives. It is necessary that the time<br />
frame for scoping and contracting should be adhered to in<br />
these cases<br />
• It is necessary to have a separate Overlays FA with adequate<br />
staffing in phases, i.e., scoping, budgeting, tendering and<br />
contracting and implementation stages. Simultaneously,<br />
infrastructure support such as computers with software<br />
with CAD facility, A0, A3 and other printers, heavy duty<br />
copiers, and Project Management Primavera software are<br />
116<br />
<strong>POST</strong> <strong>GAMES</strong> <strong>REPORT</strong> DELHI 2010