10.11.2014 Views

AMANDA HYNAN FINAL THESIS PDF

AMANDA HYNAN FINAL THESIS PDF

AMANDA HYNAN FINAL THESIS PDF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of using mainstream mobile technologies and having access to communication based<br />

AAC software within the same mainstream device. This initially started on the Apple<br />

platform and Higginbotham and Jacobs (2011) explain how Apple’s development of<br />

the iPad, and the emergence of non-iPad tablets, has not only changed the face of<br />

mobile technology, but by supporting voice output Apps, has also changed the face of<br />

AAC with increased choice for: cheaper products, alternative access options, and<br />

standard or specific software applications.<br />

The literature base is proliferating around the use of mobile technology and Apps<br />

within the field of AAC. Some Apps have been judged appropriate for people with<br />

autism who use AAC (Sennott, 2011) whilst others may not have been developed<br />

around principles of language acquisition and research evidence (Light &<br />

McNaughton, 2012). Researchers are attempting to develop frameworks within which<br />

Apps can be evaluated in relation to individual need (Gosnell, Costello & Shane,<br />

2011a, 2011b; Alliano, Herriger, Koutsoftas & Bartolotta, 2012). Hershberger (2011)<br />

warns ill-considered App solutions may lead to people who use AAC and their<br />

families losing faith in the potential support of AAC. He suggests, in line with<br />

McBride (2011), that whilst remaining enthusiastic about mobile technologies for<br />

people with complex communication needs, AAC procedures must be applied to<br />

evaluate individual needs and guide decisions about technological solutions. Many<br />

Apps targeted at mass markets may not be specific enough for people with complex<br />

communication needs (Beukelman, 2012, cited by McNaughton & Light, 2013).<br />

McNaughton and Light (2013) state the goal of any device must be to focus on<br />

communication rather than the technology. They also outline how the cost of followup<br />

technical support is included in the price of traditional AAC devices which is not<br />

the case with AAC Apps on mobile technologies (there is little, if any, technical<br />

support available post purchase).<br />

Since the release of the iPad there has been a proliferation of competing products.<br />

Higginbotham and Jacobs (2011) describe how Android (developed by Google) is<br />

significantly different from Apple iOS as it is an open source operating system and<br />

therefore available to software developers to use in their products. This will mean that<br />

within small programming communities, like those in the world of AAC, individual<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!