Superconducting Technology Assessment - nitrd
Superconducting Technology Assessment - nitrd
Superconducting Technology Assessment - nitrd
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The major issue to be addressed will be assuring a source of low-cost<br />
packaging at affordable cost. Several approaches should be evaluated:<br />
– Develop a superconducting MCM production capability.<br />
– Find a vendor willing to customize its advanced MCM packaging<br />
process to include superconducting wire layers.<br />
– Procure MCMs with advanced normal metal layers for the bulk<br />
of the MCM, then develop an internal process for adding<br />
superconducting wiring.<br />
MCMs<br />
The design of MCMs for SCE chips is technically feasible and fairly well understood. However, the design for higher<br />
speeds and interface issues needs further development. The panel expects that MCMs for processor elements of a<br />
petaflops-scale system will be much more complex and require more layers of controlled impedance wiring than<br />
those that have been built today, with stringent cross-talk and ground-bounce requirements. Although some of the<br />
MCM interconnection can be accomplished with copper or other normal metal layers, some of the layers will have<br />
to be superconducting for the low voltage RSFQ signals. Kyocera has produced limited numbers of such MCMs for<br />
a crossbar switch prototype. These MCMs provide an example and base upon which to develop a suitable volume<br />
production capability for MCMs.<br />
Affordable Packaging a Concern<br />
It is expected that the technology will be available for such packaging, but the major issue to be addressed will be<br />
assuring a source of low-cost packaging at affordable cost. Several approaches should be evaluated:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
Develop a superconducting MCM production capability, similar to the chip production capability<br />
(perhaps even sited with the chip facility to share facility and some staff costs). Although this is the<br />
most expensive approach, it provides the most assured access.<br />
Find a vendor willing to customize its advanced MCM packaging process to include superconducting<br />
wire layers and procure packages from the vendor. Because of the relatively low volumes in the production<br />
phase, the RSFQ development effort would have to provide most, if not all, of the Non-Recurring Engineering<br />
(NRE) costs associated with this packaging. Smaller vendors would be more likely to support this than<br />
large vendors.<br />
Procure MCMs with advanced normal metal layers for the bulk of the MCM, then develop an internal<br />
process for adding superconducting wiring. This is less expensive than approach 1, but it depends on<br />
the vendor’s process, which may change without notice.<br />
22