Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13 - Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13 - Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital
Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13 - Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
50<br />
2. Our Trust <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Devon</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Exeter</strong> NHS Foundation Trust<br />
<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Accounts</strong> <strong>2012</strong>/<strong>13</strong><br />
Patient Equality<br />
Objectives<br />
1. To continuously improve the<br />
care of our older patients<br />
Measures:<br />
Year-on-year improvement in the<br />
'equality gap' for patients aged 65+ in<br />
relation to emergency re-admissions<br />
<strong>and</strong> involvement in incidents.<br />
We would expect that the proportion<br />
of patients aged 65+ who are<br />
emergency re-admissions or involved in<br />
reported incidents would be the same<br />
as the proportion of all patients who<br />
are in that age group.<br />
The situation in the <strong>2012</strong> Equality Data<br />
<strong>Report</strong> is as follows:<br />
% patients from<br />
the 65+ age<br />
group who are<br />
“emergency<br />
re-admissions<br />
% patients who<br />
are 65+ age<br />
group in reported<br />
incidents<br />
% of all inpatients<br />
who are 65+ age<br />
group<br />
<strong>2012</strong> 2011<br />
34% 53%<br />
59% 51%<br />
43% 43%<br />
This represents an improvement since<br />
2011 for the first indicator, with the<br />
equality gap having disappeared, so<br />
that patients aged 65+ are now less<br />
likely than expected to be emergency<br />
re-admissions.<br />
Whilst significant work is underway to<br />
improve services for the elderly which<br />
could account for this change (for<br />
example, improvements to discharge),<br />
it is also possible (due to the low<br />
numbers of emergency re-admissions)<br />
that there is some natural variance in<br />
the data year-on-year. Next year, there<br />
will be three years’ data available <strong>and</strong><br />
trends will be clearer.<br />
The second indicator, involvement in<br />
incidents, has a slightly larger equality<br />
gap, as was the case last year. The<br />
appointment of a Consultant Nurse for<br />
Older People, with a remit to spread<br />
good practice, should contribute to a<br />
reduction in the proportion of older<br />
people involved in incidents, many of<br />
which involve slips, trips <strong>and</strong> falls.<br />
2. To continuously improve our<br />
support for staff who have<br />
disabilities<br />
Measures:<br />
i. Balance of notably negative <strong>and</strong><br />
notably positive findings for staff<br />
with disabilities, in the 2011 staff<br />
survey.<br />
Current situation:<br />
notably negative findings: 10<br />
notably positive findings: 3<br />
score: - 7<br />
Goal: year-on-year improvement<br />
This result of -7 overall has improved<br />
a little since last year, when the overall<br />
score was -10.<br />
ii. Discrimination reporting rate in<br />
the staff survey on the theme of<br />
disability.<br />
Current situation:<br />
0.7% in survey taken in 2011<br />
Goal: year-on-year improvement.<br />
This indicator has changed slightly,<br />
although hardly significantly, having<br />
been 0.7% last year. Such slight<br />
changes are to be expected given<br />
the small numbers involved (16 out<br />
of 2,323 respondents reporting<br />
discrimination on the theme of<br />
disability, one more than last year).<br />
i. % in staff survey saying we<br />
have implemented reasonable<br />
adjustments:<br />
Current situation:<br />
71% (Acute Trust benchmark 70%)<br />
Goal: to remain well above the<br />
national benchmark.<br />
This indicator has worsened<br />
dramatically, falling from 84% in the<br />
previous year’s staff survey.<br />
Casework <strong>and</strong> data evidence<br />
both suggest that people with a<br />
disability are reluctant to be open<br />
about disability issues <strong>and</strong> ask for<br />
adjustments.<br />
The fall in this indicator could be either<br />
because the Trust has been less willing<br />
to grant the reasonable adjustments<br />
people with disabilities consider<br />
necessary, or because staff are less<br />
willing to ask for adjustments at a time<br />
of increased pressure to find efficiency<br />
savings.