A ripple in development? - Channel Research

More documents

Recommendations

Info

For donor governments Strengthen local level state effectiveness 1. Donor agencies should be actively pursuing a form of ‘development diplomacy’, including the deployment of technical assistance in the field, identification of risks and bottlenecks in delivery, supplementing pooled funding with targeted bilateral initiatives where required. More long range analysis 2. Donors should consider that the timeframes for relief in a phase of natural disaster reconstruction should be multi-year. 3. Donors and governments should continue to review procedures for multidonor trust funds in recovery. 4. Donors should require that project proposals and the functioning of multi-donor funding mechanisms include conflict sensitivity analysis. Better targeted livelihoods recovery 5. Donors should direct funding to basic needs and reduce the risk of further vulnerability (preventive approaches). 6. Donors should create stronger policy dialogue and coordination mechanisms at the national level around the issue of support to isolated populations. More integrated area approaches 7. Donors should consider that joint evaluations have been an effective mechanism to increase local and regional participation in responses. Less restrictive risk reduction 8. Donors should monitor the local level implementation of risk reduction strategies, and fund targeted projects where this is weak. 9. Donors should conduct disaster risk assessments prior to providing development grants or loans for projects in high risk areas. Better notions of capacity building 10. Donors should consider funding personnel support programmes designed to improve the skills of specialists, assist in placement, and conversion. 11. Donors should be sensitive to the time needed to accomplish effective and sustainable recovery programmes. 12
For the United Nations, Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and NGOs Better targeted livelihoods recovery 1. Market analyses should form part of UN and NGO funding flows aiming to restore livelihoods. 2. NGO micro-credit schemes and the more sophisticated versions of micro-finance should only follow after the relief phase. More long range analysis 3. Operational agencies should identify capacity in the country, and the impact of their actions on these resources. 4. NGOs should encourage local presence by their personnel, and monitor public perceptions and expectations. 5. Conflict sensitivity analysis should be part of all international organisation and NGO programming. Strengthen local level state effectiveness 6. NGOs should continue to refine participatory approaches, including public consultation and grievance mechanisms. 7. NGOs and UN agencies should be cooperating with government to reestablish or clarify the legal rights of affected populations to land. More integrated area approaches 8. NGOs and UN agencies should target need, articulated in terms of markets future investments. 9. UN agencies should examine how the early recovery sector leads or cluster approaches should enable a rapid transition to an area based approach. Less restrictive risk reduction 10. UN agencies, the Red Cross Movement, and NGOs should implement their DRR projects with a multi-hazard focus. 11. All agencies, in particular the Red Cross Movement, and NGOs, should attempt to design DRR projects that bring short-term as well as long-term benefits to make participation in DRR more attractive for affected communities. Better notions of capacity building 12. International agencies, which are affected by a high turnover of staff, should strengthen human resource mechanisms. 13. NGOs and UN agencies, as well as donors should develop operationally verifiable indicators and concepts that can guide agency programming. 13
Page 1: A ripple in development? Long term
Page 4 and 5: Authors: Emery Brusset (team leader
Page 6 and 7: 5 Risk reduction...................
Page 8 and 9: NGO OCHA Sida TEC TOR UN UNDP UNFPA
Page 10 and 11: State and civil society The interve
Page 12 and 13: tion is not complete, the achieveme
Page 16 and 17: 14. NGOs and UN agencies should see
Page 18 and 19: We would like to warmly thank all t
Page 20 and 21: ilitation and development (Linking
Page 22 and 23: Consequently, our study has asked:
Page 24 and 25: the style of the text in the evalua
Page 26 and 27: The team, however, enjoyed privileg
Page 28 and 29: Table 1 Summary of interviews by ca
Page 30 and 31: was the local level administration
Page 33 and 34: 2 The state and civil society 2.1 I
Page 35 and 36: On the other hand, the public’s p
Page 37 and 38: Although there is here a natural ha
Page 39 and 40: struction process, and unpredictabi
Page 41 and 42: cial structures. The context for in
Page 43 and 44: In the Maldives, the level of destr
Page 45 and 46: In Sri Lanka despite strong mobilis
Page 47 and 48: increase at the local level, the pr
Page 49 and 50: to the status quo ante, have limite
Page 51 and 52: 3 Poverty, livelihoods and economic
Page 53 and 54: This evaluation has taken account o
Page 55 and 56: income by carrying out petty tradin
Page 57 and 58: The positive effects of aid assista
Page 59 and 60: Table 3e Aid disbursement flows for
Page 61 and 62: the tsunami affected areas. The Ace
Page 63 and 64: In 2005 prior to the peace agreemen
Page 65 and 66:
In general, the main household inco
Page 67 and 68:
omy. The Acehnese tend to have expe
Page 69 and 70:
“The relatively limited economic
Page 71 and 72:
was perceived to be played by NGOs,
Page 73:
Yet the potential for change is cre
Page 76 and 77:
Shelter and housing have been salie
Page 78 and 79:
example in health or women’s live
Page 80 and 81:
gramme is one of the key factors be
Page 82 and 83:
not been sufficiently guided in rec
Page 84 and 85:
Sri Lanka’s mainstream programme
Page 86 and 87:
However, there are exceptions in bo
Page 89 and 90:
5 Risk reduction 5.1 Introduction T
Page 91 and 92:
Indonesia also has new legislation
Page 93 and 94:
Tsunamis present a relatively rare
Page 95 and 96:
There is an issue also with the “
Page 97 and 98:
More positively, the second type of
Page 99 and 100:
6 Capacity development 6.1 Introduc
Page 101 and 102:
and Italy. The Programme’s object
Page 103 and 104:
sulted communities in the east to c
Page 105 and 106:
things to many actors over time res
Page 107 and 108:
The use of information plays a cons
Page 109 and 110:
7 Conclusions The conclusions here
Page 111 and 112:
The following figure illustrates th
Page 113 and 114:
7.3 The need to give greater effect
Page 115 and 116:
Attention has not yet focused on ar
Page 117 and 118:
7.8 Overall conclusion The risk of
Page 119 and 120:
8 Recommendations The recommendatio
Page 121 and 122:
8.2 For donor governments Strengthe
Page 123 and 124:
43. Conflict sensitivity analysis s
Page 125 and 126:
Appendix 1 Terms of reference 1 Int
Page 127 and 128:
1.2 The LRRD concept 4 LRRD is a mu
Page 129 and 130:
The efforts of the international ai
Page 131 and 132:
2.2.1 Thematic questions A. The ret
Page 133 and 134:
c) How have the micro-politics of l
Page 135 and 136:
Particular issues to be reviewed in
Page 137 and 138:
In order to obtain relevant materia
Page 139 and 140:
Within two weeks prior to commencin
Page 141 and 142:
Appendix 2 Details of methodology A
Page 143 and 144:
District Sub District Samples Total
Page 145 and 146:
Appendix 3 List of persons and grou
Page 147 and 148:
Surname, Forenames Dilreshi Dirhams
Page 149 and 150:
Surname, Forenames Krassnitzer, Joh
Page 151 and 152:
Surname, Forenames Organisation and
Page 153 and 154:
Surname, Forenames Tveitnes, Ranvei
Page 155 and 156:
Date Attendees No. of ♂ No. of
Page 164:
This report is a follow-up evaluati
show all

A ripple in development? - Channel Research

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?