01.12.2014 Views

A ripple in development? - Channel Research

A ripple in development? - Channel Research

A ripple in development? - Channel Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to the status quo ante, have limited speed of progress <strong>in</strong> terms of enhanc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

people’s participation.<br />

A yet to be published study of French government loans 36 describes<br />

the unusual complexity of identify<strong>in</strong>g the priorities of national partners<br />

<strong>in</strong> the context of such a large disaster, us<strong>in</strong>g standard operat<strong>in</strong>g procedures.<br />

It also highlighted the blurred nature of areas of possible complementarity<br />

with other donors. The EC evaluation 37 of the MDF shows<br />

that a significant proportion of the projects funded show less than satisfactory<br />

performance, due to poor design.<br />

For humanitarian agencies on the other hand the “need for speed”<br />

and pressure to respond, the pressure to disburse, and pressure to deliver<br />

and phase out, accentuate the risk of plans be<strong>in</strong>g drafted hastily, and on<br />

the basis of the planners’ perception of the victims’ immediate needs,<br />

rather than of needs expressed by the populations themselves, with<br />

<strong>in</strong>sufficient attention attached to participation and <strong>in</strong>volvement.<br />

While it is difficult to strike a correct balance, time pressures generally<br />

acted aga<strong>in</strong>st participation and <strong>in</strong>formation processes <strong>in</strong> the first<br />

phases of the response 38 . Emphasis on <strong>in</strong>frastructure and specifically<br />

hous<strong>in</strong>g due to exist<strong>in</strong>g needs, coupled with public pressure, state priorities,<br />

visibility considerations and humanitarian agency and donor<br />

timeframes, dictated that relatively less focus was placed on social issues,<br />

capacity issues, and <strong>in</strong> many <strong>in</strong>stances local participation.<br />

2.6 Conclusion<br />

The constra<strong>in</strong>ts and the positive forces that affected the State’s, Civil<br />

Society’s and the private sector’s roles <strong>in</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g achieve the LRRD<br />

goals were:<br />

(1) pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g conditions before the tsunami, particularly conflict and<br />

the fact that the areas were not considered priority <strong>development</strong><br />

areas,<br />

(2) the extent of devastation and limited prior <strong>in</strong>stitutional capacity <strong>in</strong><br />

the areas,<br />

(3) the shift<strong>in</strong>g level of legitimacy,<br />

(4) the variety of systems <strong>in</strong> place,<br />

(5) the nature of the aid provided, be<strong>in</strong>g more supply-driven rather<br />

than demand or needs-driven, and<br />

(6) the artificial separation of the newly created coord<strong>in</strong>ation mechanisms<br />

and bodies from ma<strong>in</strong>stream <strong>development</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

36<br />

Evaluation of Agence Française de Développement Post-Disaster Programme, <strong>Channel</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

2009<br />

37<br />

Mid-Term Evaluation of the Multi-Donor Fund for Aceh and Nias, Particip and <strong>Channel</strong> <strong>Research</strong> for<br />

the EC, 2009.<br />

38<br />

TEC Synthesis Study, 2006.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!