(IVAR) - Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 6-8 for a definition of the column headings that appear in Table D-1. Table D-1. The position and behavioral data for 234 targets being tracked simultaneously at Edisto Island, South Carolina, 4 October 2008. The data listed are for the tracks displayed in Figure 6-22 and are for the time interval 01:18:20 to 01:18:22 UTC (i.e., a single antenna revolution). Date Track ID Update Time Range (m) Azimuth (deg.) Height (m) Heading (deg.) Speed (m/s) Latitude Longitude 10/4/2008 0 1:18:21 748 106 256 347 7.8 32.5611 -80.2897 10/4/2008 1 1:18:21 586 126 200 249 6.4 32.5598 -80.2923 10/4/2008 3 1:18:20 502 17 172 26 8.0 32.5672 -80.2958 10/4/2008 11 1:18:20 249 338 85 30 2.6 32.5650 -80.2983 10/4/2008 14 1:18:20 1965 53 672 289 5.5 32.5735 -80.2806 10/4/2008 17 1:18:21 2234 90 764 346 22.2 32.5628 -80.2735 10/4/2008 20 1:18:21 3643 116 1246 154 11.8 32.5487 -80.2623 10/4/2008 21 1:18:21 4235 121 1448 197 11.0 32.5431 -80.2587 10/4/2008 25 1:18:21 2610 122 893 198 11.2 32.5504 -80.2738 10/4/2008 26 1:18:21 4169 129 1426 190 11.2 32.5393 -80.2627 10/4/2008 27 1:18:21 4888 132 1672 187 8.2 32.5335 -80.2585 10/4/2008 29 1:18:21 5055 124 1729 184 13.9 32.5372 -80.2528 10/4/2008 32 1:18:21 2959 144 1012 202 11.7 32.5414 -80.2787 10/4/2008 33 1:18:21 5351 138 1830 203 12.5 32.5271 -80.2591 10/4/2008 34 1:18:21 1161 174 397 48 9.8 32.5525 -80.2960 10/4/2008 36 1:18:21 1336 197 457 325 7.8 32.5513 -80.3014 10/4/2008 38 1:18:21 1757 198 601 241 7.5 32.5478 -80.3030 10/4/2008 40 1:18:22 1870 204 640 208 5.6 32.5475 -80.3054 10/4/2008 42 1:18:21 3296 164 1127 253 13.9 32.5344 -80.2875 10/4/2008 45 1:18:22 454 212 155 21 5.7 32.5594 -80.2999 10/4/2008 48 1:18:22 949 217 324 11 6.8 32.5561 -80.3034 10/4/2008 49 1:18:22 2731 209 934 214 10.5 32.5414 -80.3115 10/4/2008 50 1:18:22 537 219 184 19 3.2 32.5592 -80.3009 10/4/2008 51 1:18:21 4318 126 1477 191 12.5 32.5401 -80.2601 10/4/2008 56 1:18:22 1604 204 549 91 10.1 32.5497 -80.3042 10/4/2008 58 1:18:22 3084 242 1055 164 15.5 32.5497 -80.3262 10/4/2008 72 1:18:22 954 296 326 15 8.7 32.5666 -80.3065 10/4/2008 73 1:18:22 1720 335 588 292 6.0 32.5770 -80.3051 10/4/2008 75 1:18:20 2712 346 928 251 7.4 32.5866 -80.3045 10/4/2008 76 1:18:20 1612 350 551 312 3.1 32.5772 -80.3002 10/4/2008 79 1:18:20 2851 342 975 201 10.8 32.5873 -80.3068 336
Table D-1 (cont.). Date Track ID Update Time Range (m) Azimuth (deg.) Height (m) Heading (deg.) Speed (m/s) Latitude Longitude 10/4/2008 84 1:18:20 2883 54 986 235 9.8 32.5782 -80.2725 10/4/2008 88 1:18:20 2479 64 848 205 10.0 32.5728 -80.2737 10/4/2008 91 1:18:20 3781 55 1293 175 18.3 32.5826 -80.2644 10/4/2008 92 1:18:20 959 61 328 352 6.5 32.5671 -80.2884 10/4/2008 95 1:18:20 3356 66 1148 141 20.3 32.5753 -80.2647 10/4/2008 97 1:18:22 2899 326 992 224 12.3 32.5845 -80.3147 10/4/2008 106 1:18:21 2935 79 1004 213 10.9 32.5681 -80.2667 10/4/2008 108 1:18:20 2413 4 825 263 15.0 32.5846 -80.2957 10/4/2008 110 1:18:20 866 338 296 7 5.4 32.5701 -80.3009 10/4/2008 117 1:18:22 2300 332 787 241 12.2 32.5812 -80.3089 10/4/2008 121 1:18:21 2538 140 868 203 9.3 32.5454 -80.2800 10/4/2008 122 1:18:21 1060 85 362 357 7.7 32.5638 -80.2861 10/4/2008 125 1:18:21 2779 86 951 203 11.0 32.5646 -80.2678 10/4/2008 134 1:18:20 3787 349 1295 204 9.9 32.5964 -80.3051 10/4/2008 135 1:18:21 1642 178 562 210 3.0 32.5481 -80.2967 10/4/2008 137 1:18:21 3546 186 1213 226 10.6 32.5311 -80.3012 10/4/2008 138 1:18:21 1582 151 541 302 5.5 32.5504 -80.2892 10/4/2008 139 1:18:21 863 149 295 3 6.8 32.5562 -80.2927 10/4/2008 143 1:18:21 1810 176 619 57 5.2 32.5466 -80.2959 10/4/2008 144 1:18:21 2474 184 846 211 9.1 32.5406 -80.2990 10/4/2008 146 1:18:21 1262 191 432 336 12.5 32.5517 -80.3000 10/4/2008 148 1:18:21 1984 146 679 203 6.2 32.5481 -80.2854 10/4/2008 150 1:18:21 648 198 222 70 16.8 32.5573 -80.2995 10/4/2008 159 1:18:21 1860 164 636 262 9.5 32.5468 -80.2918 10/4/2008 160 1:18:22 1127 268 385 85 4.5 32.5624 -80.3093 10/4/2008 166 1:18:22 2166 300 741 223 12.6 32.5728 -80.3172 10/4/2008 168 1:18:22 4091 295 1399 190 17.4 32.5782 -80.3370 10/4/2008 172 1:18:22 3609 328 1234 167 9.6 32.5903 -80.3180 10/4/2008 174 1:18:20 795 337 272 52 10.8 32.5695 -80.3006 10/4/2008 176 1:18:22 2815 281 963 234 12.0 32.5675 -80.3268 10/4/2008 180 1:18:20 743 3 254 64 9.5 32.5696 -80.2969 10/4/2008 188 1:18:22 1389 297 475 224 6.5 32.5686 -80.3105 10/4/2008 193 1:18:21 4755 82 1626 206 11.6 32.5687 -80.2472 10/4/2008 194 1:18:21 3464 82 1185 203 8.3 32.5670 -80.2608 10/4/2008 196 1:18:21 3577 72 1223 193 10.6 32.5730 -80.2612 10/4/2008 199 1:18:20 422 63 144 315 8.6 32.5646 -80.2933 10/4/2008 207 1:18:21 1189 191 407 301 14.5 32.5524 -80.2997 337
Page 1 and 2:
FINAL REPORT Integration and Valida
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents List of Tables ..
Page 5 and 6:
APPENDIX A. POINTS OF CONTACT .....
Page 7 and 8:
Table 6-17. Altitudinal distributio
Page 9 and 10:
List of Figures Figure 2-1. Chronol
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 6-17. Plot of the northing c
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 6-42. eBirdRad display based
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 6-82. Hourly track count ove
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 6-115: COP display showing f
Page 19 and 20:
List of Acronyms Acronym AGL AIP AR
Page 21 and 22:
Acronym RST RT SEA SQL SSC Pacific
Page 23 and 24:
Carmen Lombardo Naval Air Station,
Page 25 and 26:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Military bases an
Page 27 and 28:
database and redistributed to other
Page 29 and 30:
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND Encro
Page 31 and 32:
A seventh objective, the Functional
Page 33 and 34:
Table 1-1 (cont.). IVAR TASK/ OBJEC
Page 35 and 36:
environmental stewardship with miss
Page 37 and 38:
2 TECHNOLOGY/METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTIO
Page 39 and 40:
The original BirdRad system was des
Page 41 and 42:
2.4 TECHNOLOGY/METHODOLOGY DEVELOPM
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 2-2. Configuration of BirdRa
Page 45 and 46:
2.4.3 eBirdRad - Digital Radars wit
Page 47 and 48:
Figure 2-5. Interior view of the eB
Page 49 and 50:
accuracy and target continuity over
Page 51 and 52:
permanently installed at SEA. Prior
Page 53 and 54:
2.5 ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF T
Page 55 and 56:
3 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES Table 3-1
Page 57 and 58:
Table 3-1 (cont.). Performance Obje
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
For the third test, Validation Usin
Page 67 and 68:
temporal domain by recording all bi
Page 69 and 70:
3.1.2.2.7 Provides Bird Abundance o
Page 71 and 72:
difference in the time (i.e., the l
Page 73 and 74:
3.1.6.2.4 Maintenance [SE4.2] We es
Page 75 and 76:
Table 4-1. Summary of the IVAR stud
Page 77 and 78:
4.1 MCAS CHERRY POINT Marine Corps
Page 79 and 80:
2006 the primary eBirdRad unit from
Page 81 and 82:
(directional WiFi) to the Internet.
Page 83 and 84:
• Large (several thousand) flocks
Page 85 and 86:
location for demonstrating the capa
Page 87 and 88:
5.1 CONCEPTUAL TEST DESIGN 5 TEST D
Page 89 and 90:
5.3 DESIGN AND LAYOUT OF TECHNOLOGY
Page 91 and 92:
Assuming these lines evidence confi
Page 93 and 94:
that dataset [Section 6.5.1.3]. 5.5
Page 95 and 96:
6 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT The Perfor
Page 97 and 98:
ecord the time, Track ID, and other
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 6-1. Percentage of targets c
Page 101 and 102:
Comparing the performance of dish v
Page 103 and 104:
Figure 6-4. The basic sensor elemen
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 6-6. The polygon around the
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 6-8. Diagram of sampling “
Page 109 and 110:
• It takes several scans (nominal
Page 111 and 112:
Session Correla tions 600 500 y = 1
Page 113 and 114:
To evaluate the capabilities of the
Page 115 and 116:
Figure 6-15. Runway 3 at SEA, showi
Page 117 and 118:
comparisons between the RCH-GPS dat
Page 119 and 120:
Figure 6-18. Plot of the northing c
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 6-20. Plot of the easting co
Page 123 and 124:
Conclusion In the quantitative perf
Page 125 and 126:
Table 6-8. Column headings of the T
Page 127 and 128:
Table 6-9 demonstrates quantitative
Page 129 and 130:
Table 6-10. The parameters of targe
Page 131 and 132:
Table 6-11. The position of Visual
Page 133 and 134:
Table 6-12. Solitary targets at MCA
Page 135 and 136:
Figure 6-23. The track of target T2
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
intended to demonstrate these syste
Page 147 and 148:
Figure 6-34. Screen capture of bird
Page 149 and 150:
6.1.2 Qualitative Performance Crite
Page 151 and 152:
upper right have completely converg
Page 153 and 154:
Figure 6-38. The progression of the
Page 155 and 156:
The slight difference in alignment
Page 157 and 158:
Figure 6-42. eBirdRad display based
Page 159 and 160:
Figure 6-44. A partial history of t
Page 161 and 162:
6.2 SAMPLING PROTOCOL 6.2.1 Quantit
Page 163 and 164:
Figure 6-46. Image from the track h
Page 165 and 166:
Table 6-14. Dates, times and names
Page 167 and 168:
Figure 6-48. Fifteen-minute (06:04-
Page 169 and 170:
Figure 6-50. Fifteen-minute (02:24-
Page 171 and 172:
We used a TVW to process the plots
Page 173 and 174:
Figure 6-53. In an example of night
Page 175 and 176:
6.2.1.4 Efficiently Stores Bird Tra
Page 177 and 178:
Figure 6-56 shows sites 13-24 in th
Page 179 and 180:
We extracted the radar data for thi
Page 181 and 182:
Figure 6-57. Digital image of the d
Page 183 and 184:
Table 6-17. Altitudinal distributio
Page 185 and 186:
hours apart, showed considerable va
Page 187 and 188:
• The sampling event time period
Page 189 and 190:
underwent a 4-minute initialization
Page 191 and 192:
Figure 6-62. DRP Live application l
Page 193 and 194:
commands we issued to the radar; th
Page 195 and 196:
4. Range Decrease (x7) 5. Range Inc
Page 197 and 198:
Figure 6-65, Figure 6-66, and Figur
Page 199 and 200:
6.2.2.4 Provides Spatial Distributi
Page 201 and 202:
Figure 6-69. A plot of all track ac
Page 203 and 204:
Figure 6-71. Twelve 2-hour historie
Page 205 and 206:
Figure 6-72. TVW application displa
Page 207 and 208:
Conclusion Figure 6-74. Oblique vie
Page 209 and 210:
Archived Data to a GIS We used the
Page 211 and 212:
(SQL). Extracting target data from
Page 213 and 214:
Figure 6-78. Daily, unfiltered, tra
Page 215 and 216:
Figure 6-79. Time periods selected
Page 217 and 218:
Figure 6-82. Hourly track count ove
Page 219 and 220:
esults are displayed in Figure 6-83
Page 221 and 222:
As can be seen in Figure 6-83, the
Page 223 and 224:
Figure 6-84 clearly demonstrates th
Page 225 and 226:
Conclusion We have successfully dem
Page 227 and 228:
LAN within a facility to the operat
Page 229 and 230:
All reference times were recorded i
Page 231 and 232:
Description of Remote Display - As
Page 233 and 234:
mounted laptop computer (Figure 6-8
Page 235 and 236:
very good because the system was sa
Page 237 and 238:
operations personnel or their contr
Page 239 and 240:
Figure 6-90. Alarm status pane and
Page 241 and 242:
Figure 6-92. Alarm triggered as a f
Page 243 and 244:
Figure 6-95. Screen capture of the
Page 245 and 246:
Figure 6-96. An example from a data
Page 247 and 248:
Table 6-29. Differences found betwe
Page 249 and 250:
6.4 DATA INTEGRATION 6.4.1 Quantita
Page 251 and 252:
Figure 6-100. Screen captures for S
Page 253 and 254:
We used a screen-capture program at
Page 255 and 256:
Results Table 6-32 records the time
Page 257 and 258:
We acquired the appropriate plots a
Page 259 and 260:
Figure 6-105. Track histories of ta
Page 261 and 262:
synchronized, both spatially and te
Page 263 and 264:
0.004687 seconds ahead of the NTP t
Page 265 and 266:
Figure 6-108: COP display showing f
Page 267 and 268:
Figure 6-110: TVW display showing t
Page 269 and 270:
The next example from NASWI involve
Page 271 and 272:
Figure 6-114: TVW display showing t
Page 273 and 274:
Figure 6-116: COP display showing a
Page 275 and 276:
Fusion processing was enabled in th
Page 277 and 278:
processing associated with this dat
Page 279 and 280:
Figure 6-122: Track IDs shown for b
Page 281 and 282:
Conclusion We successfully demonstr
Page 283 and 284:
Of course, many other factors contr
Page 285 and 286:
one, Jim Swift, had been exposed to
Page 287 and 288:
Methods The US military 27 designat
Page 289 and 290:
Natural R.esoan:es Br.mch 22541Jolm
Page 291 and 292:
Given these considerations, the IVA
Page 293 and 294:
Results No maintenance was required
Page 295 and 296:
acquired and is testing JRC S-band
Page 297 and 298:
areas of overlap. Data fusion algor
Page 299 and 300:
6.8 FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND PER
Page 301 and 302:
Table 7-1. Cost Model for a Standal
Page 303 and 304:
additional processors account of th
Page 305 and 306:
Installation Site Assessment - Rada
Page 307 and 308:
e incurred, depending on what infor
Page 309 and 310: eal time, avian radars and can dete
Page 311 and 312: Network Connectivity. The US Depart
Page 313 and 314: Airport Improvement Program (AIP) f
Page 315 and 316: 9 REFERENCES Anderson, C., and S. O
Page 317 and 318: APPENDIX A. POINTS OF CONTACT POINT
Page 319 and 320: POINT OF CONTACT Name Ryan King Mat
Page 321 and 322: APPENDIX B. ANALYTICAL METHODS SUPP
Page 323 and 324: METHOD #2: VALIDATION BY IMAGE COMP
Page 325 and 326: The pattern of yellows and blues in
Page 327 and 328: Radar Team (RT) Site Selection Sinc
Page 329 and 330: will measured the magnetic bearing
Page 331 and 332: Figure B-6. Using a GPS to record s
Page 333 and 334: • Visual Observer - observes bird
Page 335 and 336: Figure B-9. Flowchart of target con
Page 337 and 338: VT: “Radar, Team 2-Alpha copies T
Page 339 and 340: eam and the VTs have difficulty loc
Page 341 and 342: why it was changed, who made the ch
Page 343 and 344: METHOD #4: CONFIRMATION OF BIRD TAR
Page 345 and 346: Figure B-12. Duplexed image showing
Page 347 and 348: Table B-2. Dates, times, and antenn
Page 349 and 350: For the analysis of the simultaneou
Page 351 and 352: Table B-3. Altitude of the radar be
Page 353 and 354: Figure B-17. Diagram of sampling
Page 355 and 356: METHOD #6: DEMONSTRATING REAL-TIME
Page 357 and 358: APPENDIX C. DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE/
Page 359: APPENDIX D. SUPPORTING DATA D.1 Par
Page 363 and 364: Table D-1 (cont.). Date Track ID Up
Page 365 and 366: Table D-1 (cont.). Date Track ID Up
Page 367 and 368: D.2 Listing of One-Hour Track Histo
Page 369 and 370: Table D-2 (cont.). 07:00-08:00 WI_A
Page 371 and 372: APPENDIX E. SURVEY OF AIRPORT PERSO
Page 373 and 374: used as the real-time target becaus
Page 375 and 376: Table E-1. Remote radar display lat
Page 377: 7. Please rate the following where
show all

(IVAR) - Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?