22.01.2015 Views

(IVAR) - Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and ...

(IVAR) - Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and ...

(IVAR) - Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

very high as it has been operating without mishaps for many months. One user limitation<br />

is we were not able to determine the operational health of the radar systems. Alarms, for<br />

those times when the system is malfunctioning should be part of future upgrades similar to<br />

what the FAA now has with its NAVAIDS at SEA. CEAT is the process of<br />

developing protocols for periodic system checks <strong>and</strong> routine maintenance so the<br />

functional health of each radar can be evaluated before a system degrades to a point<br />

where there is a significant loss in the unit’s ability to detect birds (weak magnetron).<br />

Overall Rating of Remote Display<br />

6. Please rate the following where 1 = poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good <strong>and</strong> 5 =<br />

excellent.<br />

The assigned numerical ratings were for the DRP unless specified otherwise:<br />

Display information content 4<br />

Display update rate 3<br />

Display Format 2<br />

Please provide specific comments to support or exp<strong>and</strong> your rating.<br />

Display information content - Overall the DRP is very good for viewing the plots <strong>and</strong><br />

tracks from a single radar at a time. We found plot information to be extremely valuable<br />

when displayed in conjunction with the track information for identifying birds circling<br />

tightly or in other ways that may not always be detected by the tracking algorithms. The<br />

GEC had an extremely beneficial feature in that it was able to playback the last hour of<br />

bird tracks within a few minutes. This feature proved extremely helpful in finding<br />

locations on the airfield with the greatest amount of recent bird activity. This information<br />

was of value as it helped us decide where to begin our wildlife observations for conducting<br />

this survey <strong>and</strong> potentially our future wildlife control work.<br />

Display update rate – Although the GEC does integrate all three radars into one<br />

common display, its real-time update rate of 5 s was double that of the DRP software<br />

display (2.5 s). The value of viewing detections as close to real time as possible is a<br />

function of what we are asking it to do. The use of archived data is of great value to us,<br />

the airport operators, but a lag time of 15 to 20 seconds might very well be too imprecise<br />

to alert the tower or moreover to divert an aircraft on approach to a SEA runway.<br />

Display Format - The tradeoff of using the DRP for this evaluation rather than the GEC,<br />

was its more limited user functionality. Rapidly zooming to an airfield location of interest<br />

was made more difficult with its limited ability to zoom. Because the GEC is specifically<br />

designed around superior user satisfaction <strong>and</strong> now has the one hour<br />

playback feature, improving its update rate <strong>and</strong> its ability to display plots as well as tracks<br />

is likely to result in a single preferred remote display system that can show all detections<br />

from all radars simultaneously.<br />

352

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!