(IVAR) - Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table D-1 (cont.). Date Track ID Update Time Range (m) Azimuth (deg.) Height (m) Heading (deg.) Speed (m/s) Latitude Longitude 10/4/2008 487 1:18:22 1514 310 518 236 8.4 32.5716 -80.3097 10/4/2008 488 1:18:20 1517 4 519 33 10.6 32.5765 -80.2961 10/4/2008 489 1:18:20 1138 351 389 278 17.7 32.5730 -80.2992 10/4/2008 490 1:18:21 2410 119 824 210 10.5 32.5525 -80.2748 10/4/2008 491 1:18:20 1341 27 459 272 6.1 32.5737 -80.2909 10/4/2008 492 1:18:22 2705 322 925 239 12.3 32.5821 -80.3152 10/4/2008 496 1:18:20 3305 342 1130 221 9.6 32.5913 -80.3080 10/4/2008 499 1:18:20 1529 47 523 308 17.6 32.5724 -80.2855 10/4/2008 501 1:18:21 3574 157 1222 239 11.5 32.5333 -80.2822 10/4/2008 502 1:18:20 3027 68 1035 257 38.4 32.5732 -80.2675 10/4/2008 506 1:18:21 1135 80 388 245 5.6 32.5647 -80.2854 10/4/2008 510 1:18:21 3093 114 1058 196 13.0 32.5517 -80.2672 10/4/2008 519 1:18:20 1023 328 350 59 2.6 32.5707 -80.3031 10/4/2008 522 1:18:22 1630 320 558 274 5.5 32.5742 -80.3084 10/4/2008 524 1:18:21 3386 82 1158 199 13.5 32.5672 -80.2616 10/4/2008 525 1:18:20 879 357 301 28 5.9 32.5708 -80.2978 10/4/2008 526 1:18:22 2371 327 811 239 12.0 32.5809 -80.3110 10/4/2008 527 1:18:22 370 321 126 18 5.3 32.5655 -80.2998 10/4/2008 533 1:18:22 1003 228 343 125 8.3 32.5569 -80.3053 10/4/2008 537 1:18:21 2012 145 688 204 6.4 32.5480 -80.2851 10/4/2008 538 1:18:21 804 95 275 319 8.4 32.5622 -80.2888 10/4/2008 542 1:18:21 3928 85 1343 200 12.7 32.5662 -80.2557 10/4/2008 547 1:18:21 1029 126 352 56 10.0 32.5574 -80.2885 10/4/2008 551 1:18:21 2824 168 966 243 12.2 32.5380 -80.2911 10/4/2008 552 1:18:21 4795 163 1640 141 6.7 32.5216 -80.2822 10/4/2008 554 1:18:21 1090 168 373 46 7.8 32.5533 -80.2948 10/4/2008 556 1:18:21 912 78 312 37 5.7 32.5646 -80.2878 10/4/2008 559 1:18:21 2701 187 924 220 9.1 32.5387 -80.3010 10/4/2008 561 1:18:21 1084 183 371 70 9.9 32.5531 -80.2978 10/4/2008 565 1:18:21 1870 105 640 144 5.4 32.5586 -80.2781 10/4/2008 566 1:18:21 3175 198 1086 158 13.1 32.5356 -80.3077 10/4/2008 567 1:18:22 1349 223 461 289 10.2 32.5540 -80.3071 10/4/2008 570 1:18:22 1121 225 384 19 3.9 32.5558 -80.3058 10/4/2008 573 1:18:22 2166 321 741 245 11.8 32.5781 -80.3118 10/4/2008 576 1:18:20 1243 68 425 22 5.1 32.5671 -80.2851 10/4/2008 578 1:18:21 3353 120 1147 204 11.8 32.5480 -80.2663 10/4/2008 579 1:18:22 1639 268 561 21 6.8 32.5623 -80.3148 340
Table D-1 (cont.). Date Track ID Update Time Range (m) Azimuth (deg.) Height (m) Heading (deg.) Speed (m/s) Latitude Longitude 10/4/2008 586 1:18:22 1097 309 375 27 9.4 32.5691 -80.3064 10/4/2008 590 1:18:22 4439 321 1518 190 10.9 32.5938 -80.3273 10/4/2008 597 1:18:20 2769 351 947 219 17.9 32.5875 -80.3022 10/4/2008 598 1:18:20 3243 352 1109 238 9.7 32.5919 -80.3020 10/4/2008 600 1:18:20 2003 356 685 212 7.4 32.5809 -80.2989 10/4/2008 603 1:18:22 3035 324 1038 210 13.6 32.5850 -80.3163 10/4/2008 606 1:18:21 1900 183 650 224 5.0 32.5458 -80.2984 10/4/2008 609 1:18:22 4318 294 1477 176 14.9 32.5787 -80.3394 10/4/2008 610 1:18:21 1359 115 465 28 21.0 32.5576 -80.2843 10/4/2008 611 1:18:20 1320 56 452 259 6.2 32.5696 -80.2857 10/4/2008 613 1:18:20 1233 66 422 80 6.5 32.5673 -80.2853 10/4/2008 616 1:18:21 3815 85 1305 204 9.0 32.5662 -80.2569 10/4/2008 619 1:18:22 2246 321 768 235 12.4 32.5786 -80.3124 10/4/2008 620 1:18:21 1385 79 474 316 4.1 32.5652 -80.2828 10/4/2008 622 1:18:22 732 252 250 195 36.8 32.5608 -80.3047 10/4/2008 626 1:18:20 5189 352 1775 200 10.3 32.6092 -80.3052 10/4/2008 627 1:18:21 1038 185 355 67 8.4 32.5536 -80.2983 10/4/2008 628 1:18:22 764 221 261 320 14.9 32.5577 -80.3027 10/4/2008 630 1:18:22 605 236 207 2 17.3 32.5598 -80.3027 10/4/2008 633 1:18:21 981 79 335 39 14.1 32.5646 -80.2871 10/4/2008 634 1:18:20 1378 7 471 255 7.4 32.5752 -80.2955 10/4/2008 635 1:18:21 2721 110 931 204 14.1 32.5547 -80.2700 10/4/2008 640 1:18:21 3344 162 1144 193 10.1 32.5342 -80.2863 10/4/2008 641 1:18:21 1365 163 467 1 9.0 32.5511 -80.2931 10/4/2008 642 1:18:21 1055 162 361 35 8.4 32.5539 -80.2938 10/4/2008 643 1:18:20 2526 56 864 223 10.3 32.5757 -80.2751 10/4/2008 644 1:18:21 1780 189 609 314 3.7 32.5470 -80.3003 10/4/2008 645 1:18:21 3549 191 1214 197 3.3 32.5315 -80.3047 10/4/2008 646 1:18:22 610 202 209 4 25.6 32.5578 -80.2998 10/4/2008 648 1:18:22 1891 333 647 289 5.8 32.5780 -80.3066 10/4/2008 652 1:18:21 3251 121 1112 216 11.8 32.5479 -80.2676 10/4/2008 653 1:18:22 2729 221 933 221 7.2 32.5443 -80.3163 10/4/2008 654 1:18:21 2593 100 887 121 13.4 32.5588 -80.2702 10/4/2008 654 1:18:22 3303 218 1130 177 14.1 32.5394 -80.3190 10/4/2008 659 1:18:22 2720 238 930 246 11.3 32.5498 -80.3218 10/4/2008 662 1:18:22 1575 263 539 246 30.3 32.5612 -80.3140 10/4/2008 663 1:18:21 5153 113 1763 182 16.4 32.5447 -80.2469 341
Page 1 and 2:
FINAL REPORT Integration and Valida
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents List of Tables ..
Page 5 and 6:
APPENDIX A. POINTS OF CONTACT .....
Page 7 and 8:
Table 6-17. Altitudinal distributio
Page 9 and 10:
List of Figures Figure 2-1. Chronol
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 6-17. Plot of the northing c
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 6-42. eBirdRad display based
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 6-82. Hourly track count ove
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 6-115: COP display showing f
Page 19 and 20:
List of Acronyms Acronym AGL AIP AR
Page 21 and 22:
Acronym RST RT SEA SQL SSC Pacific
Page 23 and 24:
Carmen Lombardo Naval Air Station,
Page 25 and 26:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Military bases an
Page 27 and 28:
database and redistributed to other
Page 29 and 30:
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND Encro
Page 31 and 32:
A seventh objective, the Functional
Page 33 and 34:
Table 1-1 (cont.). IVAR TASK/ OBJEC
Page 35 and 36:
environmental stewardship with miss
Page 37 and 38:
2 TECHNOLOGY/METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTIO
Page 39 and 40:
The original BirdRad system was des
Page 41 and 42:
2.4 TECHNOLOGY/METHODOLOGY DEVELOPM
Page 43 and 44:
Figure 2-2. Configuration of BirdRa
Page 45 and 46:
2.4.3 eBirdRad - Digital Radars wit
Page 47 and 48:
Figure 2-5. Interior view of the eB
Page 49 and 50:
accuracy and target continuity over
Page 51 and 52:
permanently installed at SEA. Prior
Page 53 and 54:
2.5 ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF T
Page 55 and 56:
3 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES Table 3-1
Page 57 and 58:
Table 3-1 (cont.). Performance Obje
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
For the third test, Validation Usin
Page 67 and 68:
temporal domain by recording all bi
Page 69 and 70:
3.1.2.2.7 Provides Bird Abundance o
Page 71 and 72:
difference in the time (i.e., the l
Page 73 and 74:
3.1.6.2.4 Maintenance [SE4.2] We es
Page 75 and 76:
Table 4-1. Summary of the IVAR stud
Page 77 and 78:
4.1 MCAS CHERRY POINT Marine Corps
Page 79 and 80:
2006 the primary eBirdRad unit from
Page 81 and 82:
(directional WiFi) to the Internet.
Page 83 and 84:
• Large (several thousand) flocks
Page 85 and 86:
location for demonstrating the capa
Page 87 and 88:
5.1 CONCEPTUAL TEST DESIGN 5 TEST D
Page 89 and 90:
5.3 DESIGN AND LAYOUT OF TECHNOLOGY
Page 91 and 92:
Assuming these lines evidence confi
Page 93 and 94:
that dataset [Section 6.5.1.3]. 5.5
Page 95 and 96:
6 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT The Perfor
Page 97 and 98:
ecord the time, Track ID, and other
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 6-1. Percentage of targets c
Page 101 and 102:
Comparing the performance of dish v
Page 103 and 104:
Figure 6-4. The basic sensor elemen
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 6-6. The polygon around the
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 6-8. Diagram of sampling “
Page 109 and 110:
• It takes several scans (nominal
Page 111 and 112:
Session Correla tions 600 500 y = 1
Page 113 and 114:
To evaluate the capabilities of the
Page 115 and 116:
Figure 6-15. Runway 3 at SEA, showi
Page 117 and 118:
comparisons between the RCH-GPS dat
Page 119 and 120:
Figure 6-18. Plot of the northing c
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 6-20. Plot of the easting co
Page 123 and 124:
Conclusion In the quantitative perf
Page 125 and 126:
Table 6-8. Column headings of the T
Page 127 and 128:
Table 6-9 demonstrates quantitative
Page 129 and 130:
Table 6-10. The parameters of targe
Page 131 and 132:
Table 6-11. The position of Visual
Page 133 and 134:
Table 6-12. Solitary targets at MCA
Page 135 and 136:
Figure 6-23. The track of target T2
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
intended to demonstrate these syste
Page 147 and 148:
Figure 6-34. Screen capture of bird
Page 149 and 150:
6.1.2 Qualitative Performance Crite
Page 151 and 152:
upper right have completely converg
Page 153 and 154:
Figure 6-38. The progression of the
Page 155 and 156:
The slight difference in alignment
Page 157 and 158:
Figure 6-42. eBirdRad display based
Page 159 and 160:
Figure 6-44. A partial history of t
Page 161 and 162:
6.2 SAMPLING PROTOCOL 6.2.1 Quantit
Page 163 and 164:
Figure 6-46. Image from the track h
Page 165 and 166:
Table 6-14. Dates, times and names
Page 167 and 168:
Figure 6-48. Fifteen-minute (06:04-
Page 169 and 170:
Figure 6-50. Fifteen-minute (02:24-
Page 171 and 172:
We used a TVW to process the plots
Page 173 and 174:
Figure 6-53. In an example of night
Page 175 and 176:
6.2.1.4 Efficiently Stores Bird Tra
Page 177 and 178:
Figure 6-56 shows sites 13-24 in th
Page 179 and 180:
We extracted the radar data for thi
Page 181 and 182:
Figure 6-57. Digital image of the d
Page 183 and 184:
Table 6-17. Altitudinal distributio
Page 185 and 186:
hours apart, showed considerable va
Page 187 and 188:
• The sampling event time period
Page 189 and 190:
underwent a 4-minute initialization
Page 191 and 192:
Figure 6-62. DRP Live application l
Page 193 and 194:
commands we issued to the radar; th
Page 195 and 196:
4. Range Decrease (x7) 5. Range Inc
Page 197 and 198:
Figure 6-65, Figure 6-66, and Figur
Page 199 and 200:
6.2.2.4 Provides Spatial Distributi
Page 201 and 202:
Figure 6-69. A plot of all track ac
Page 203 and 204:
Figure 6-71. Twelve 2-hour historie
Page 205 and 206:
Figure 6-72. TVW application displa
Page 207 and 208:
Conclusion Figure 6-74. Oblique vie
Page 209 and 210:
Archived Data to a GIS We used the
Page 211 and 212:
(SQL). Extracting target data from
Page 213 and 214:
Figure 6-78. Daily, unfiltered, tra
Page 215 and 216:
Figure 6-79. Time periods selected
Page 217 and 218:
Figure 6-82. Hourly track count ove
Page 219 and 220:
esults are displayed in Figure 6-83
Page 221 and 222:
As can be seen in Figure 6-83, the
Page 223 and 224:
Figure 6-84 clearly demonstrates th
Page 225 and 226:
Conclusion We have successfully dem
Page 227 and 228:
LAN within a facility to the operat
Page 229 and 230:
All reference times were recorded i
Page 231 and 232:
Description of Remote Display - As
Page 233 and 234:
mounted laptop computer (Figure 6-8
Page 235 and 236:
very good because the system was sa
Page 237 and 238:
operations personnel or their contr
Page 239 and 240:
Figure 6-90. Alarm status pane and
Page 241 and 242:
Figure 6-92. Alarm triggered as a f
Page 243 and 244:
Figure 6-95. Screen capture of the
Page 245 and 246:
Figure 6-96. An example from a data
Page 247 and 248:
Table 6-29. Differences found betwe
Page 249 and 250:
6.4 DATA INTEGRATION 6.4.1 Quantita
Page 251 and 252:
Figure 6-100. Screen captures for S
Page 253 and 254:
We used a screen-capture program at
Page 255 and 256:
Results Table 6-32 records the time
Page 257 and 258:
We acquired the appropriate plots a
Page 259 and 260:
Figure 6-105. Track histories of ta
Page 261 and 262:
synchronized, both spatially and te
Page 263 and 264:
0.004687 seconds ahead of the NTP t
Page 265 and 266:
Figure 6-108: COP display showing f
Page 267 and 268:
Figure 6-110: TVW display showing t
Page 269 and 270:
The next example from NASWI involve
Page 271 and 272:
Figure 6-114: TVW display showing t
Page 273 and 274:
Figure 6-116: COP display showing a
Page 275 and 276:
Fusion processing was enabled in th
Page 277 and 278:
processing associated with this dat
Page 279 and 280:
Figure 6-122: Track IDs shown for b
Page 281 and 282:
Conclusion We successfully demonstr
Page 283 and 284:
Of course, many other factors contr
Page 285 and 286:
one, Jim Swift, had been exposed to
Page 287 and 288:
Methods The US military 27 designat
Page 289 and 290:
Natural R.esoan:es Br.mch 22541Jolm
Page 291 and 292:
Given these considerations, the IVA
Page 293 and 294:
Results No maintenance was required
Page 295 and 296:
acquired and is testing JRC S-band
Page 297 and 298:
areas of overlap. Data fusion algor
Page 299 and 300:
6.8 FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND PER
Page 301 and 302:
Table 7-1. Cost Model for a Standal
Page 303 and 304:
additional processors account of th
Page 305 and 306:
Installation Site Assessment - Rada
Page 307 and 308:
e incurred, depending on what infor
Page 309 and 310:
eal time, avian radars and can dete
Page 311 and 312:
Network Connectivity. The US Depart
Page 313 and 314: Airport Improvement Program (AIP) f
Page 315 and 316: 9 REFERENCES Anderson, C., and S. O
Page 317 and 318: APPENDIX A. POINTS OF CONTACT POINT
Page 319 and 320: POINT OF CONTACT Name Ryan King Mat
Page 321 and 322: APPENDIX B. ANALYTICAL METHODS SUPP
Page 323 and 324: METHOD #2: VALIDATION BY IMAGE COMP
Page 325 and 326: The pattern of yellows and blues in
Page 327 and 328: Radar Team (RT) Site Selection Sinc
Page 329 and 330: will measured the magnetic bearing
Page 331 and 332: Figure B-6. Using a GPS to record s
Page 333 and 334: • Visual Observer - observes bird
Page 335 and 336: Figure B-9. Flowchart of target con
Page 337 and 338: VT: “Radar, Team 2-Alpha copies T
Page 339 and 340: eam and the VTs have difficulty loc
Page 341 and 342: why it was changed, who made the ch
Page 343 and 344: METHOD #4: CONFIRMATION OF BIRD TAR
Page 345 and 346: Figure B-12. Duplexed image showing
Page 347 and 348: Table B-2. Dates, times, and antenn
Page 349 and 350: For the analysis of the simultaneou
Page 351 and 352: Table B-3. Altitude of the radar be
Page 353 and 354: Figure B-17. Diagram of sampling
Page 355 and 356: METHOD #6: DEMONSTRATING REAL-TIME
Page 357 and 358: APPENDIX C. DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE/
Page 359 and 360: APPENDIX D. SUPPORTING DATA D.1 Par
Page 361 and 362: Table D-1 (cont.). Date Track ID Up
Page 363: Table D-1 (cont.). Date Track ID Up
Page 367 and 368: D.2 Listing of One-Hour Track Histo
Page 369 and 370: Table D-2 (cont.). 07:00-08:00 WI_A
Page 371 and 372: APPENDIX E. SURVEY OF AIRPORT PERSO
Page 373 and 374: used as the real-time target becaus
Page 375 and 376: Table E-1. Remote radar display lat
Page 377: 7. Please rate the following where
show all

(IVAR) - Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?