22.01.2015 Views

(IVAR) - Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and ...

(IVAR) - Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and ...

(IVAR) - Final Report - Strategic Environmental Research and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For the third test, Validation Using A Remotely Controlled Vehicle, we used a recording GPS<br />

onboard a remotely controlled helicopter to record the coordinates of the helicopter as it was<br />

flown through a series of maneuvers, while an avian radar system was automatically tracking the<br />

same target. We then plotted <strong>and</strong> compared the tracks from the GPS <strong>and</strong> the avian radar to<br />

determine how closely they were matched in time <strong>and</strong> space.<br />

Two other sets of tests related to the question of how well the digital avian radar systems we test<br />

can automatically track targets are discussed in Sections 3.1.1.2.1 <strong>and</strong> 3.1.1.2.2.<br />

3.1.1.1.2 Location Information versus Time for Each Track [PA2.1]<br />

Once automatically detection <strong>and</strong> tracking of birds in real time was demonstrated, the next<br />

capability we addressed was whether the data captured for each tracked target would be useful to<br />

the end-users of these systems. Of particular importance in this regard is the ability to record the<br />

three spatial <strong>and</strong> the temporal of each tracked target. We chose to demonstrate this capability by<br />

examining the fields display in the TrackDataViewer® software supplied with the Accipiter®<br />

avian radar systems. We set as our success criterion that the spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal coordinates of<br />

each tracked target should be available from each scan of the radar (every ~2.5 seconds)<br />

3.1.1.1.3 Track Capacity [PA3.1]<br />

Given that the detailed data gathered for each tracked target provided useful information to the<br />

end-users, can the radar track <strong>and</strong> gather these types of data for a reasonable number of targets<br />

tracked simultaneously in real time We chose to demonstrate this capability by examining the<br />

plots <strong>and</strong> tracks data from one of our validation studies that was conducted during a period of<br />

migration when lots of birds were likely to be in flight at the same time. We set as our success<br />

criterion for track capacity that the system should be capable of tracking <strong>and</strong> recording the data<br />

from 100 or more targets simultaneously.<br />

3.1.1.1.4 Tracks Single Large Birds on Airfield [PA4.1]<br />

The previous objective examined the question of whether the avian radar system could<br />

automatically track a reasonable number of targets simultaneously. If it can, then can it also<br />

track targets out to a range that includes the perimeter of most military airfields To demonstrate<br />

this capability, we chose 2 km as a range from the radar that would encompass the perimeter of<br />

most military airfields. We then set as our success criterion that we would be able to<br />

automatically detect <strong>and</strong> track a large, raptor-sized bird at that distance or farther.<br />

3.1.1.1.5 Tracks Birds Beyond Airfield [PA5.1]<br />

Because birds move freely across the boundaries of military facilities, wildlife incidents on the<br />

base are often related to activities outside the fence line. Therefore, tracking birds beyond the<br />

perimeter of an airfield can be as important as tracking them inside the perimeter. Criterion<br />

PA5.1 was designed to demonstrate that avian radar systems are capable of tracking birds up to 5<br />

km from the radar; that is, up to 3 km beyond the perimeter of a typical airfield.<br />

3.1.1.2 Qualitative Performance Criteria<br />

The performance objectives discussed in the following subsections were designed to evaluate<br />

sampling protocols qualitatively, with success criteria that could be defined in terms of<br />

“Achieved” or “Not Achieved”.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!