21.03.2015 Views

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

216 BIOLOGY IS ENGINEERING<br />

vast <strong>and</strong> interesting, <strong>of</strong> course, but it does not include very many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

systems designed by natural selection! The process <strong>of</strong> evolution is notoriously<br />

lacking in foresight. Since it has no foresight at all, unforeseen or<br />

unforeseeable side effects are nothing to it; it proceeds, unlike human engineers,<br />

via <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ligate process <strong>of</strong> creating vast numbers <strong>of</strong> relatively<br />

uninsulated designs, most <strong>of</strong> which are hopelessly flawed because <strong>of</strong> selfdefeating<br />

side effects, but a few <strong>of</strong> which, by dumb luck, are spared that<br />

ignominious fate. Moreover, this apparently inefficient design philosophy<br />

carries a tremendous bonus that is relatively unavailable to <strong>the</strong> more efficient,<br />

top-down process <strong>of</strong> human engineers: thanks to its having no bias against<br />

unexamined side effects, it can take advantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rare cases where<br />

beneficial serendipitous side effects emerge. Sometimes, that is, designs<br />

emerge in which systems interact to produce more than was aimed at. In<br />

particular (but not exclusively), one gets elements in such systems that have<br />

multiple functions.<br />

Elements with multiple functions are not unknown to human engineering,<br />

<strong>of</strong> course, but <strong>the</strong>ir relative rarity is signaled by <strong>the</strong> delight we are apt to feel<br />

when we encounter a new one. (A favorite <strong>of</strong> mine is found in <strong>the</strong> Diconix<br />

portable printer. This optimally tiny printer runs on largish rechargeable<br />

batteries, which have to be stored somewhere; <strong>the</strong>y fit snugly inside <strong>the</strong><br />

platen, or roller.) On reflection, we can see that such instances <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />

function are epistemically accessible to engineers under various salubrious<br />

circumstances, but we can also see that by <strong>and</strong> large such solutions to design<br />

problems must be exceptions against a background <strong>of</strong> strict isolation <strong>of</strong><br />

functional elements. In biology, we encounter quite crisp anatomical isolation<br />

<strong>of</strong> functions (<strong>the</strong> kidney is entirely distinct from <strong>the</strong> heart; nerves <strong>and</strong> blood<br />

vessels are separate conduits strung through <strong>the</strong> body, etc.), <strong>and</strong> without this<br />

readily discernible isolation, reverse engineering in biology would no doubt<br />

be humanly impossible. But we also see superim-position <strong>of</strong> functions that<br />

apparently goes "all <strong>the</strong> way down." It is very, very hard to think about<br />

entities in which <strong>the</strong> elements have multiple overlapping roles in<br />

superimposed subsystems, <strong>and</strong>, moreover, in which some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most salient<br />

effects observable in <strong>the</strong> interaction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se elements may not be functions at<br />

all. but merely by-products <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> multiple functions being served. 18<br />

Until recently, biologists who wanted to be reverse engineers had to<br />

concentrate on figuring out <strong>the</strong> designed features <strong>of</strong> "finished products"—<br />

organisms. These <strong>the</strong>y could collect by <strong>the</strong> hundreds or thous<strong>and</strong>s, study <strong>the</strong><br />

variations <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong>, take apart, <strong>and</strong> manipulate ad lib. It was much more<br />

difficult to get any epistemic purchase on <strong>the</strong> developmental or building<br />

18. The preceding three paragraphs are drawn, with revisions, from Dennett 1994a.<br />

Artifact Hermeneutics, or Reverse Engineering 217<br />

process by which a genotype gets "expressed" in a fully formed phenotype.<br />

And <strong>the</strong> design processes that shaped <strong>the</strong> developmental processes that shape<br />

<strong>the</strong> "finished products" were largely inaccessible to <strong>the</strong> sorts <strong>of</strong> intrusive<br />

observation <strong>and</strong> manipulation that good science (or good reverse<br />

engineering) thrives on. You could look at <strong>the</strong> sketchy historical record, <strong>and</strong><br />

run it in fast-forward (like "elapsed-time" photography <strong>of</strong> plants growing,<br />

wea<strong>the</strong>r developing, etc.—always a nifty way to make <strong>the</strong> patterns visible ),<br />

but you couldn't "rewind <strong>the</strong> tape" <strong>and</strong> run variations on <strong>the</strong> initial conditions.<br />

Now, thanks to computer simulations, it is possible to study <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>ses<br />

about <strong>the</strong> design process that have always lain at <strong>the</strong> heart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Darwinian<br />

vision. Not surprisingly, <strong>the</strong>y turn out to be more complicated, <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves more intricately designed, than we had thought.<br />

Once <strong>the</strong> processes <strong>of</strong> R <strong>and</strong> D <strong>and</strong> construction begin to come into focus,<br />

we can see that an affliction <strong>of</strong> shortsightedness that has <strong>of</strong>ten misled<br />

interpreters <strong>of</strong> human artifacts has multiple parallels in biology. When we<br />

engage in artifact hermeneutics, trying to decipher <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> items<br />

uncovered by archeologists, or trying to recover a proper interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

ancient monuments that we have grown up with, <strong>the</strong>re is a tendency to<br />

overlook <strong>the</strong> possibility that some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> features that puzzle us have no<br />

function at all in <strong>the</strong> finished product, but played a crucial functional role in<br />

<strong>the</strong> process that created <strong>the</strong> product.<br />

Ca<strong>the</strong>drals, for instance, have many curious architectural features that have<br />

provoked functional fantasies <strong>and</strong> fierce debates among art historians. The<br />

functions <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se features are fairly obvious. The many "vises" or<br />

circular stairways that twist <strong>the</strong>ir way up inside <strong>the</strong> piers <strong>and</strong> walls are useful<br />

ways for custodians to gain access to remote parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> building: to <strong>the</strong> ro<strong>of</strong>,<br />

say, <strong>and</strong> to <strong>the</strong> space between <strong>the</strong> vault <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> where <strong>the</strong> machinery is<br />

hidden that lowers <strong>the</strong> ch<strong>and</strong>eliers to <strong>the</strong> floor so that c<strong>and</strong>les may be<br />

replaced. But many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vises would be <strong>the</strong>re even if no such later access<br />

had been anticipated by <strong>the</strong> builders; it was simply <strong>the</strong> best, or maybe <strong>the</strong><br />

only, way for <strong>the</strong> builders to get <strong>the</strong> building crew <strong>and</strong> materials where <strong>the</strong>y<br />

needed to be during construction. O<strong>the</strong>r passageways leading nowhere inside<br />

<strong>the</strong> walls are probably <strong>the</strong>re in order to get fresh air into <strong>the</strong> interior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

walls (Fitchen 1961). Medieval mortar took a long time— years, in some<br />

cases—to cure, <strong>and</strong> as it cured it shrank, so care was taken to keep wall<br />

thickness minimized so that distortion was minimized as <strong>the</strong> building cured.<br />

(Thus those passageways have a similar function to <strong>the</strong> heat-dissipation "fins"<br />

on automobile-engine housings, except that <strong>the</strong>ir functions lapsed once <strong>the</strong><br />

buildings reached maturity.)<br />

Moreover, much that appears unremarkable when you look at a ca<strong>the</strong>dral<br />

as simply a finished product seems deeply puzzling when you start asking<br />

how it could have been built. Chicken-egg problems abound. If you build <strong>the</strong><br />

flying buttresses before you build <strong>the</strong> central vault, <strong>the</strong>y will push <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!