21.03.2015 Views

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

348 THE CRANES OF CULTURE Invasion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Body-Snatchers 349<br />

<strong>and</strong> buildings <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r inventions are also metnc vehicles (Campbell 1979).<br />

A wagon with spoked wheels carries not only grain or freight from place to<br />

place; it carries <strong>the</strong> brilliant idea <strong>of</strong> a wagon with spoked wheels from mind<br />

to mind. A meme's existence depends on a physical embodiment in some<br />

medium; if all such physical embodiments are destroyed, that meme is<br />

extinguished. It may, <strong>of</strong> course, make a subsequent, independent reappearance,<br />

just as dinosaur genes could, in principle, get toge<strong>the</strong>r again in<br />

some distant future, but <strong>the</strong> dinosaurs <strong>the</strong>y created <strong>and</strong> inhabited would not<br />

be descendants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> original dinosaurs—or at least not any more directly<br />

than we are. The fate <strong>of</strong> memes is similarly determined by whe<strong>the</strong>r copies<br />

<strong>and</strong> copies <strong>of</strong> copies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m persist <strong>and</strong> multiply, <strong>and</strong> this depends on <strong>the</strong><br />

selective forces that act directly on <strong>the</strong> various physical vehicles that embody<br />

<strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Memes, like genes, are potentially immortal, but, like genes, <strong>the</strong>y depend<br />

on <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> a continuous chain <strong>of</strong> physical vehicles, persisting in <strong>the</strong><br />

face <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Second Law <strong>of</strong> Thermodynamics. Books are relatively permanent,<br />

<strong>and</strong> inscriptions on monuments even more permanent, but unless <strong>the</strong>se are<br />

under <strong>the</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> human conservators, <strong>the</strong>y tend to dissolve in time.<br />

Manfred Eigen makes <strong>the</strong> same point about genes, though driving <strong>the</strong> analogy<br />

in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r direction:<br />

Consider, for instance, one <strong>of</strong> Mozart's compositions, one that is retained<br />

stably in our concert repertoire. The reason for its retention is not that <strong>the</strong><br />

notes <strong>of</strong> this work are printed in a particularly durable ink. The persistence<br />

with which a Mozart symphony reappears in our concert programmes is<br />

solely a consequence <strong>of</strong> its high selection value. In order for this to retain<br />

its effect, <strong>the</strong> work must be played again <strong>and</strong> again, <strong>the</strong> public must take<br />

note <strong>of</strong> it, <strong>and</strong> it must be continually re-evaluated in competition with<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r compositions. Stability <strong>of</strong> genetic information has similar causes.<br />

[Eigen 1992, p. 15.]<br />

As with genes, immortality is more a matter <strong>of</strong> replication than <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

longevity <strong>of</strong> individual vehicles. As we saw in note 4 <strong>of</strong> chapter 6, <strong>the</strong><br />

preservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Platonic memes, via a series <strong>of</strong> copies <strong>of</strong> copies, is a<br />

particularly striking case <strong>of</strong> this. Although a few papyrus fragments <strong>of</strong> Plato's<br />

texts roughly contemporaneous with <strong>the</strong> man himself still exist, <strong>the</strong> survival<br />

<strong>of</strong> his memes owes almost nothing to <strong>the</strong> chemical stability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se fragments.<br />

Today's libraries contain thous<strong>and</strong>s if not millions <strong>of</strong> physical copies<br />

(<strong>and</strong> translations) <strong>of</strong> Plato's Republic, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> key ancestors in <strong>the</strong> transmission<br />

<strong>of</strong> this text turned to dust centuries ago.<br />

Brute physical replication <strong>of</strong> vehicles is not enough to ensure meme<br />

longevity. A few thous<strong>and</strong> hardbound copies <strong>of</strong> a new book can disappear<br />

with scarcely a trace in a few years, <strong>and</strong> who knows how many brilliant<br />

letters to <strong>the</strong> editor, reproduced in hundreds <strong>of</strong> thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> copies, dis-<br />

appear into l<strong>and</strong>fills <strong>and</strong> incinerators every day? The day may come when<br />

nonhuman meme-evaluators suffice to select <strong>and</strong> arrange for <strong>the</strong> preservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> particular memes, but for <strong>the</strong> time being, memes still depend at least<br />

indirectly on one or more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir vehicles' spending at least a brief, pupal<br />

stage in a remarkable sort <strong>of</strong> meme nest: a human mind.<br />

Minds are in limited supply, <strong>and</strong> each mind has a limited capacity for<br />

memes, <strong>and</strong> hence <strong>the</strong>re is a considerable competition among memes for<br />

entrv into as many minds as possible. This competition is <strong>the</strong> major selective<br />

force in <strong>the</strong> infosphere, <strong>and</strong>, just as in <strong>the</strong> biosphere, <strong>the</strong> challenge has been<br />

met with great ingenuity. "Whose ingenuity?" you may want to ask, but by<br />

now you should know that this is not always a good question; <strong>the</strong> ingenuity<br />

is <strong>the</strong>re to appreciate, whatever its source. Like a mindless virus, a meme's<br />

prospects depend on its design—not its "internal" design, whatever that<br />

might be, but <strong>the</strong> design it shows <strong>the</strong> world, its phenotype, <strong>the</strong> way it affects<br />

things in its environment. The things in its environment are minds <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

memes.<br />

For instance, whatever virtues (from our perspective) <strong>the</strong> following memes<br />

have, <strong>the</strong>y have in common <strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong> having phenotypic expressions<br />

that tend to make <strong>the</strong>ir own replication more likely by disabling or preempting<br />

<strong>the</strong> environmental forces that would tend to extinguish <strong>the</strong>m: <strong>the</strong><br />

meme for faith, which discourages <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sort <strong>of</strong> critical<br />

judgment that might decide that <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> faith was, all things considered, a<br />

dangerous idea (Dawkins 1976, p. 212); <strong>the</strong> memes for tolerance, or free<br />

speech; <strong>the</strong> meme for including a warning in a chain letter about <strong>the</strong> terrible<br />

fates <strong>of</strong> those who have broken <strong>the</strong> chain in <strong>the</strong> past; <strong>the</strong> conspiracy-<strong>the</strong>ory<br />

meme, which has a built-in response to <strong>the</strong> objection that <strong>the</strong>re is no good<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conspiracy: "Of course not—that's how powerful <strong>the</strong><br />

conspiracy is!" Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se memes are "good," <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs "bad"; what<br />

<strong>the</strong>y have in common is a phenotypic effect that systematically tends to<br />

disable <strong>the</strong> selective forces arrayed against <strong>the</strong>m. O<strong>the</strong>r things being equal,<br />

memetics predicts that conspiracy-<strong>the</strong>ory memes will persist quite<br />

independently <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir truth, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> meme for faith is apt to secure its own<br />

survival, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> religious memes that ride piggyback on it, in even<br />

<strong>the</strong> most rationalistic environments. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> meme for faith exhibits<br />

frequency-dependent fitness: it flourishes particularly in <strong>the</strong> company <strong>of</strong><br />

rationalistic memes. In a skeptic-poor world, <strong>the</strong> meme for faith does not<br />

attract much attention, <strong>and</strong> hence tends to go dormant in minds, <strong>and</strong> hence is<br />

seldom reintroduced into <strong>the</strong> infosphere. (Can we demonstrate classic<br />

predator-prey population boom-<strong>and</strong>-bust cycles between memes for faith <strong>and</strong><br />

memes for reason? Probably not, but it might be instructive to look, <strong>and</strong> ask<br />

why not.)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r concepts from population genetics transfer quite smoothly. Here is a<br />

case <strong>of</strong> what a geneticist would call linked loci; two memes that happen to be<br />

physically tied toge<strong>the</strong>r so that <strong>the</strong>y tend always to replicate toge<strong>the</strong>r,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!