21.03.2015 Views

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98 THE TREE OF LIFE Retrospective Coronations 99<br />

DNA <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different people alive today <strong>and</strong> deduce from that how recently<br />

Mitochondrial Eve lived, <strong>and</strong> even where she lived. According to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

original calculations, Mitochondrial Eve lived in Africa, very, very recently—<br />

less than three hundred thous<strong>and</strong> years ago, <strong>and</strong> maybe less than half that.<br />

These methods <strong>of</strong> analysis are controversial, however, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> African Eve<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis may be fatally flawed. Deducing where <strong>and</strong> when is a far trickier<br />

task than deducing that <strong>the</strong>re was a Mitochondrial Eve, something that<br />

nobody denies. Consider a few <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> things we already know about Mitochondrial<br />

Eve, setting aside <strong>the</strong> recent controversies. We know that she had<br />

at least two daughters who had surviving children. (If she had just one<br />

daughter, her daughter would wear <strong>the</strong> crown <strong>of</strong> Mitochondrial Eve.) To<br />

distinguish her title from her proper name, let's call her Amy. Amy bears <strong>the</strong><br />

title <strong>of</strong> Mitochondrial Eve; that is, she just happens to have been <strong>the</strong> maternal<br />

founder <strong>of</strong> today's line <strong>of</strong> people. 6 It is important to remind ourselves that in<br />

all o<strong>the</strong>r regards, <strong>the</strong>re was probably nothing remarkable or special about<br />

Mitochondrial Eve; she was certainly not <strong>the</strong> First Woman, or <strong>the</strong> founder <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> species Homo sapiens. Many earlier women were unquestionably <strong>of</strong> our<br />

species, but happen not to have any direct female lines <strong>of</strong> descendants<br />

leading to people living today. It is also true that Mitochondrial Eve was<br />

probably no stronger, faster, more beautiful, or more fecund than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

women <strong>of</strong> her day.<br />

To bring out just how unspecial Mitochondrial Eve—that is, Amy—probably<br />

was, suppose that tomorrow, thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> generations later, a virulent<br />

new virus were to spread around <strong>the</strong> Earth, wiping out 99 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

human race in a few years. The survivors, fortunate to have some innate<br />

resistance to <strong>the</strong> virus, would probably all be quite closely related. Their<br />

closest common direct female ancestor—call her Betty—would be some<br />

woman who lived hundreds or thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> generations later than Amy, <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> crown <strong>of</strong> Mitochondrial Eve would pass to her, retroactively. She may<br />

have been <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mutation that centuries later came into its own as<br />

a species-saver, but it didn't do her any good, since <strong>the</strong> virus against which it<br />

is to triumph didn't exist <strong>the</strong>n. The point is that Mitochondrial Eve can only<br />

be retrospectively crowned. This historically pivotal role is determined not<br />

just by <strong>the</strong> accidents <strong>of</strong> Amy's own time, but by <strong>the</strong> accidents <strong>of</strong> later times<br />

as well. Talk about massive contingency! If Amy's uncle hadn't saved her<br />

from drowning when she was three, none <strong>of</strong> us (with our particular<br />

mitochondrial DNA, thanks ultimately to Amy) would ever have<br />

existed! If Amy's gr<strong>and</strong>daughters had all starved to death in infancy—as so<br />

many infants did in those days—<strong>the</strong> same oblivion would be ours.<br />

The curious invisibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crown <strong>of</strong> Mitochondrial Eve in her own<br />

lifetime is easier to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> accept than <strong>the</strong> near-invisibility <strong>of</strong> what<br />

every species must have: a beginning. If species aren't eternal, <strong>the</strong>n all <strong>of</strong><br />

time can be divided, somehow, into <strong>the</strong> times before <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> species<br />

x, <strong>and</strong> all subsequent times. But what must have happened at <strong>the</strong> interface? It<br />

may help if we think <strong>of</strong> a similar puzzle that has baffled many people. Have<br />

you ever wondered, when hearing a new joke, where it came from? If you are<br />

like almost everybody else I have ever known or heard <strong>of</strong>, you never make up<br />

jokes; you pass on, perhaps with "improvements," something you heard from<br />

someone who heard it from someone, who... Now, we know <strong>the</strong> process<br />

cannot go on forever. A joke about President Clinton, for instance, cannot be<br />

more than a year or so old. So who makes up <strong>the</strong> jokes? Joke-authors (as<br />

contrasted with joke-purveyors) are invisible. 7 Nobody ever seems to catch<br />

<strong>the</strong>m in <strong>the</strong> act <strong>of</strong> authorship. There is even folklore—an "urban legend"—to<br />

<strong>the</strong> effect that <strong>the</strong>se jokes are all created in prison, by prisoners, those<br />

dangerous <strong>and</strong> unnatural folks, so unlike <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> us, <strong>and</strong> with nothing<br />

better to do with <strong>the</strong>ir time than to fashion jokes in <strong>the</strong>ir secret underground<br />

joke-workshops. Nonsense. It is hard to believe— but it must be true—that<br />

<strong>the</strong> jokes we hear <strong>and</strong> pass on have evolved from earlier stories, picking up<br />

revisions <strong>and</strong> updates as <strong>the</strong>y are passed along. A joke typically has no one<br />

author; its authorship is distributed over dozens or hundreds or thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

tellers, solidifying for a while in some particularly topical <strong>and</strong> currently<br />

amusing version, before going dormant, like <strong>the</strong> ancestors from which it<br />

grew. Speciation is equally hard to witness, <strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong> same reason.<br />

When has speciation occurred? In many cases (perhaps most, perhaps<br />

almost all—biologists disagree about how important <strong>the</strong> exceptions are), <strong>the</strong><br />

speciation depends on a geographical split in which a small group— maybe a<br />

single mating pair—w<strong>and</strong>er <strong>of</strong>f <strong>and</strong> start a lineage that becomes<br />

reproductively isolated. This is allopatric speciation, in contrast to sympatric<br />

speciation, which does not involve any geographic barriers. Suppose<br />

we watch <strong>the</strong> departure <strong>and</strong> resettlement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> founding group. Time passes,<br />

<strong>and</strong> several generations come <strong>and</strong> go. Has speciation occurred? Not yet,<br />

certainly. We won't know until many generations later whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong>se<br />

individuals should be crowned as species-initiators.<br />

There is not <strong>and</strong> could not be anything internal or intrinsic to <strong>the</strong> individuals—or<br />

even to <strong>the</strong> individuals-as-<strong>the</strong>y-fit-into-<strong>the</strong>ir-environment—from<br />

6. Philosophers have <strong>of</strong>ten discussed strange examples <strong>of</strong> individuals known to us only via<br />

definite descriptions, but <strong>the</strong>y have usually coniined <strong>the</strong>ir attention to such boring—if<br />

real—individuals as <strong>the</strong> shortest spy. (There has to be one, doesn't <strong>the</strong>re?) I suggest that<br />

Mitochondrial Eve is a much more delicious example, all <strong>the</strong> more so for being <strong>of</strong> some<br />

genuine <strong>the</strong>oretical interest in evolutionary biology.<br />

7. There are, <strong>of</strong> course, <strong>the</strong> writers who make <strong>the</strong>ir living writing funny lines for television<br />

comedians, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> comedians <strong>the</strong>mselves, who create much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own material,<br />

but, with negligible exceptions, <strong>the</strong>se people are not <strong>the</strong> creators <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> joke stories<br />

("Did you hear <strong>the</strong> one about <strong>the</strong> guy who...?") that get passed around.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!