21.03.2015 Views

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER TWELVE<br />

The Cranes <strong>of</strong> Culture<br />

1. THE MONKEY'S UNCLE MEETS THE MEME<br />

What is <strong>the</strong> question now placed before society with a glib assurance<br />

<strong>the</strong> most astounding? The question is this—Is man an ape or an angel?<br />

My Lord, I am on <strong>the</strong> side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> angels.<br />

—BENJAMIN DISRAELI, speech at Oxford, 1864<br />

Darwin himself saw clearly that if he claimed that his <strong>the</strong>ory applied to one<br />

particular species, this would upset its members in ways he dreaded, so he<br />

held back at first. There is almost no mention <strong>of</strong> our species in Origin <strong>of</strong><br />

Species—aside from its important role as a crane in artificial selection. But <strong>of</strong><br />

course this fooled no one. It was clear where <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory was heading, so<br />

Darwin worked hard to produce his own, carefully thought-out version before<br />

<strong>the</strong> critics <strong>and</strong> skeptics could bury <strong>the</strong> issue in misrepresentations <strong>and</strong> alarm<br />

calls: The Descent <strong>of</strong> Man, <strong>and</strong> Selection in Relation to Sex (1871). There was<br />

no doubt at all, Darwin observed: we—Homo sapiens— are one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

species over which evolutionary <strong>the</strong>ory reigns. Seeing that <strong>the</strong>re was little<br />

hope <strong>of</strong> denying this fact, some Darwin-dreaders have sought a champion<br />

who might deliver a pre-emptive strike, disabling <strong>the</strong> dangerous idea before it<br />

ever got a chance to spread across <strong>the</strong> isthmus that connects our species with<br />

all <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. Whenever <strong>the</strong>y have found someone announcing <strong>the</strong> demise <strong>of</strong><br />

Darwinism (or neo-Darwinism, or <strong>the</strong> modern syn<strong>the</strong>sis), <strong>the</strong>y have egged<br />

him on, hoping that this time <strong>the</strong> revolution would be real. Self-styled<br />

revolutionaries have struck early <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten, but, as we have seen, <strong>the</strong>y have<br />

managed only to invigorate <strong>the</strong>ir target, deepening our underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> it<br />

while enhancing it with complexities undreamt <strong>of</strong> by Darwin himself.<br />

Falling back, <strong>the</strong>n, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> foes <strong>of</strong> <strong>Darwin's</strong> dangerous idea have<br />

planted <strong>the</strong>mselves firmly on <strong>the</strong> isthmus, like Horatio at <strong>the</strong> bridge, intent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!