21.03.2015 Views

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

Darwin's Dangerous Idea - Evolution and the Meaning of Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34 TELL ME WHY<br />

Hume, who deftly exposed <strong>the</strong> insoluble problems with this vision, <strong>and</strong> had<br />

glimpses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Darwinian alternative, could not see how to take it seriously.<br />

CHAPTER 2: Darwin, setting out to answer a relatively modest question about<br />

die origin <strong>of</strong> species, described a process he called natural selection, a<br />

mindless, purposeless, mechanical process. This turns out to be <strong>the</strong> seed <strong>of</strong><br />

an answer to a much gr<strong>and</strong>er question: how does Design come into<br />

existence?<br />

CHAPTER TWO<br />

An <strong>Idea</strong> Is Born<br />

1. WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT SPECIES?<br />

Charles Darwin did not set out to concoct an antidote to John Locke's<br />

conceptual paralysis, or to pin down <strong>the</strong> gr<strong>and</strong> cosmological alternative that<br />

had barely eluded Hume. Once his great idea occurred to him, he saw that it<br />

would indeed have <strong>the</strong>se truly revolutionary consequences, but at <strong>the</strong> outset<br />

he was not trying to explain <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong> life, or even its origin. His aim<br />

was slightly more modest: he wanted to explain <strong>the</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> species.<br />

In his day, naturalists had amassed mountains <strong>of</strong> tantalizing facts about<br />

living things <strong>and</strong> had succeeded in systematizing <strong>the</strong>se facts along several<br />

dimensions. Two great sources <strong>of</strong> wonder emerged from this work (Mayr<br />

1982). First, <strong>the</strong>re were all <strong>the</strong> discoveries about <strong>the</strong> adaptations <strong>of</strong> organisms<br />

that had enthralled Hume's Clean<strong>the</strong>s: "All <strong>the</strong>se various machines, <strong>and</strong><br />

even <strong>the</strong>ir most minute parts, are adjusted to each o<strong>the</strong>r with an accuracy<br />

which ravishes into admiration all men who have ever contemplated <strong>the</strong>m"<br />

(Pt. II). Second, <strong>the</strong>re was <strong>the</strong> prolific diversity <strong>of</strong> living things—literally<br />

millions <strong>of</strong> different kinds <strong>of</strong> plants <strong>and</strong> animals. Why were <strong>the</strong>re so many?<br />

This diversity <strong>of</strong> design <strong>of</strong> organisms was as striking, in some regards, as<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir excellence <strong>of</strong> design, <strong>and</strong> even more striking were <strong>the</strong> patterns discernible<br />

within that diversity. Thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> gradations <strong>and</strong> variations between<br />

organisms could be observed, but <strong>the</strong>re were also huge gaps between<br />

<strong>the</strong>m. There were birds <strong>and</strong> mammals that swam like fish, but none with<br />

gills; <strong>the</strong>re were dogs <strong>of</strong> many sizes <strong>and</strong> shapes, but no dogcats or dogcows<br />

or fea<strong>the</strong>red dogs. The patterns called out for classification, <strong>and</strong> by <strong>Darwin's</strong><br />

time <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great taxonomists (who began by adopting <strong>and</strong> correcting<br />

Aristotle's ancient classifications) had created a detailed hierarchy <strong>of</strong><br />

two kingdoms (plants <strong>and</strong> animals), divided into phyla, which divided into<br />

classes, which divided into orders, which divided into families, which<br />

divided into genera (<strong>the</strong> plural <strong>of</strong> "genus"), which divided into species.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!