student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching
student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching
student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Part B: Building Leadership Capacity - DSC: Property, Construction & Project Management ART Report<br />
9.3 Background <strong>and</strong> Project Focus<br />
The overall focus of the ART project is on improving <strong>student</strong> <strong>feedback</strong><br />
by improving the School’s learning facilities. Over the past several years,<br />
the School has exp<strong>and</strong>ed by the inclusion of the two additional existing<br />
programs migrated from the Business College <strong>and</strong> creation of a new<br />
undergraduate program. The incorporation of a common first year across<br />
the four programs has had the consequence of increasing the size of classes<br />
from 60 – 70 to in excess of 200 <strong>student</strong>s. Two of the existing learning<br />
spaces have not been renovated since Building 8 was constructed in the<br />
early 1990s. These spaces are badly in need of attention. As the project<br />
evolved, opportunities arose to address other matters relating to the<br />
<strong>student</strong>s learning experiences.<br />
What courses were the subject of this project? Give total <strong>student</strong> numbers<br />
<strong>and</strong> breakdown how it was taught at the start of the project. Include any other<br />
relevant in<strong>for</strong>mation about the profile of the <strong>student</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the context of<br />
delivery.<br />
BUIL1154 –85 <strong>student</strong>s. Previously the course was taught as conventional<br />
lectures with group assignments <strong>and</strong> an examination. Students are final year<br />
construction management <strong>student</strong>s.<br />
BUIL1107 – 212 <strong>student</strong>s. The previous course was taught via three one <strong>and</strong><br />
one half hour lectures by an internal staff member following which the <strong>student</strong>s<br />
undertook exercises in a semi-supervised way. This is a common CAD course<br />
across the four undergraduate programs offered by the School <strong>for</strong> <strong>student</strong>s<br />
commencing their studies.<br />
What were the central themes or issues being addressed in the project?<br />
The method used involved focus group/s of <strong>student</strong>s, with questions<br />
developed from the following themes:<br />
1. Preferred learning style – individual or group, role play exercises,<br />
experiential learning, work integrated learning <strong>and</strong> reflective journal/diary.<br />
2. The types of facilities that promote good learning <strong>and</strong> teaching practices<br />
in the areas of in<strong>for</strong>mation technology <strong>and</strong> communication with regard<br />
to services, infrastructure <strong>and</strong> access.<br />
3. The types of facilities that promote good learning <strong>and</strong> teaching practices<br />
in the areas of learning <strong>and</strong> teaching spaces with regard to large lecture<br />
theatres, seminar rooms, tutorial rooms.<br />
4. <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>and</strong> teaching styles with regard to delivery to large groups, small<br />
groups, tutorials, workshops. The use of project/problem-based learning,<br />
model building, drawing, practical exercises, site visits, field trips <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong><br />
surveying exercises.<br />
5. Student/staff interaction with regard to accessibility, emails, DLS<br />
discussion board.<br />
6. Feedback types to enhance learning including online tests, written<br />
or verbal.<br />
Page 121