13.04.2015 Views

student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching

student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching

student feedback and leadership - Office for Learning and Teaching

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Student Feedback & Leadership<br />

3.3 Cycle Three: Engaged Leadership<br />

3.3.1 Introduction<br />

The third action research cycle involved the design of approaches to build<br />

<strong>leadership</strong> capacity by transferring lessons being learnt within <strong>and</strong> beyond<br />

those leaders engaged in the project. Table 3 presents a summary of the action<br />

research process, identified as Engaged Leadership, that occurred in this third<br />

cycle. This cycle roughly paralleled the end of the first year of the project <strong>and</strong><br />

thus provided a useful ‘pause point’ to the action research process.<br />

Table 3 Action Research Cycle Three: Engaged Leadership<br />

CYCLE THREE<br />

ENGAGED<br />

Transfer Lessons<br />

LEADERSHIP<br />

Formal – In<strong>for</strong>mal<br />

Networking<br />

PLAN ACT OBSERVE REFLECT<br />

Project website Need to involve Active engagement<br />

pedagogy experts<br />

Facilitate sharing<br />

of ideas<br />

Facilitate reflections<br />

<strong>and</strong> analysis of<br />

<strong>leadership</strong> critical<br />

success factors <strong>and</strong><br />

barriers to building<br />

<strong>leadership</strong> capacity<br />

ARTs<br />

Develop interview<br />

<strong>and</strong> focus group<br />

guiding questions<br />

<strong>and</strong> analyse data<br />

from interviews<br />

Develop evaluation<br />

tools, data collection<br />

<strong>and</strong> analysis<br />

Case study developed<br />

<strong>for</strong> website<br />

Heads of School<br />

presentations to<br />

disseminate<br />

Extra funding support<br />

by DVC(A)<br />

Presentations to Grad.<br />

Cert. Tertiary T&L<br />

Interviews held<br />

with cross section<br />

of senior leaders.<br />

Mid project review<br />

‘Not invented here’<br />

syndrome<br />

Different roles<br />

of Facilitators<br />

Analysis of interviews<br />

revealed no extra<br />

insights from Plenary<br />

decision<br />

Is evaluation singular<br />

or group think<br />

Systematic approach<br />

to networking<br />

Role of learning<br />

<strong>and</strong> teaching expert<br />

(facilitator)<br />

Need to balance<br />

‘pure’ <strong>and</strong> ‘applied’<br />

approach to research<br />

Purpose <strong>and</strong><br />

appropriateness<br />

of interviews?<br />

How to avoid<br />

a ‘blame’ culture<br />

when things<br />

go wrong<br />

3.3.2 Plan<br />

While Cycle Two demonstrated the second <strong>leadership</strong> element of a<br />

collaborative approach to <strong>student</strong> <strong>feedback</strong>, it was recognised that moving<br />

from the existing competitive culture (both between academic disciplines<br />

<strong>and</strong> also between academic <strong>and</strong> Service ‘managerial’ approaches) presents<br />

a significant challenge <strong>for</strong> universities. This led to the next cycle that focussed<br />

on exploring action to engage more leaders by transferring the lessons being<br />

learnt from the project to the broader university community.<br />

Page 48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!