18.11.2012 Views

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 106<br />

values found are within reported ranges for a comparatively highly reactive gaseous species.<br />

Though RGM Vd may be better compared with NO2 Vd over snow.<br />

Karlsson and Nyholm note that at temperatures under –2 0 C the depositional velocity appears to<br />

be controlled by the surface resistance. The surface resistance decreases as the temperature warms<br />

due to increasing amounts of available water. Measurements with this system need to be made<br />

around 0 0 C to see if this is also the case for RGM.<br />

Slinn et. al., 1978, show that if dry deposition is the only removal mechanism for a substance<br />

not affected by chemical transformation, that the atmospheric residence time for the substance can<br />

be estimated as the deposition velocity multiplied by the height. If it assumed that Hg, once<br />

converted within the MBL is deposited almost as quickly as converted, as shown by the averaged<br />

measured depositional velocity of 1 cm s -1 then RGM would have a lifetime in Nord of around 10<br />

hrs. This would correspond to an MBL height of 360 m which is reasonable. One sees from the<br />

above relationship, that as the height of the MBL decreases, the atmospheric residence time will<br />

exponentially decrease. The measured values may reflect upper limits of surface resistance over the<br />

snow.<br />

Comparison of RGM flux with RGM ambient concentrations<br />

Figure 23., page 107, are the monitored results provided by NOAA, for RGM concentrations<br />

during the Barrow 2001 flux measurement campaign. Comparing with Figure 14., page 77, or the<br />

values in Table 3., page 76, show that when there is a deposition recorded by the REA machine,<br />

there are correspondingly low RGM ambient values. The air has been apparently depleted of RGM<br />

due to deposition. Trends of RGM rising in the air on the 8 th , 9 th and 12 th of April are recorded by<br />

the REA system as reemission, perhaps indicating that RGM can be re-volatized from the snow<br />

surface.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!