FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI
FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI
FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Asian Chemistry Letters vol. XX, No 1 (2003) XX-XX<br />
Measurements and Modelling of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) on the<br />
Faroe Islands; a case study of the difficulties of measuring GEM<br />
H.Skov 1,# , M.C.Nielsdóttir 2 , M.E.Goodsite 3 , J.Christensen 1 , C.A.Skjøth 1 , G.Geernaert 4 , O. Hertel 1 ,<br />
J.Olsen 5 .<br />
1 National Environmental Research Institute. Frederiksborgvej 399, DK 4000 Roskilde, Denmark<br />
# Corresponding author, e-mail Address: Henrik.Skov@DMU.DK<br />
2 Present address: University of East Anglia, Norwich England<br />
3 Present address: Department of Chemistry, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK 5230 Odense<br />
M, Denmark<br />
4 Present address: Inst. of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS C-305<br />
Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA<br />
5 Food and Environmental Agency, Faroe Islands<br />
___________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
Gaseous Elemental Mercury (GEM) in the atmosphere was measured on the Faroe Islands from May 2000 to<br />
March 2001. The measured data were analysed together with basic meteorology, trajectories, and modelled GEM<br />
concentrations using the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model (DEHM). The measured air concentration time<br />
series shows periods with elevated (>1.5 ng/m 3 of Hg, the generally accepted global background average)<br />
mercury concentrations. We determined that there are two potential natural causes for the higher than expected<br />
levels: local sources and/or long-range transport. After a detailed analysis, it was determined that neither local nor<br />
long range sources were sufficiently responsible for the observed levels and the pattern could not be adequately<br />
reproduced by the DEHM. Measurement artefacts are the most plausible explanation of much of the measurement<br />
pattern. The nature of the artefact is discussed and recommendation for future measurements of GEM is given.<br />
___________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
This paper is dedicated to Professor Thorvald Pedersen who has just retired from his position at the<br />
Institute of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen. Through the years we have benefited from his<br />
genuine interest and knowledge in spectroscopy and atmospheric chemistry.<br />
1.Introduction<br />
Mercury on the Faroe Islands is of both scientific and public concern due to the high concentrations in<br />
e.g. pilot whales and other higher predators of fish, where up to 3 ppm (µg/g) Hg has been measured 1 .<br />
Furthermore, it has been shown that the present levels of mercury in sea animals also have a negative<br />
effect on the health of the local populations, since these animals are an important food supply 2 . High<br />
concentrations of mercury (up to 700 ng/g) have also been observed in peat cores taken on the Faroe<br />
Islands 3 . The profiles suggest that local geological input does not significantly contribute to the<br />
mercury inventory, so the Hg must be primarily supplied by atmospheric deposition, and that the level<br />
of Hg on the Faroe Islands has through time, been higher than levels reported for other European sites.<br />
However the concentrations cannot be directly linked to atmospheric concentrations or deposition, as<br />
the levels are not only a function of deposition, but also bioaccumulation, the runoff area size and the<br />
geochemistry of the profile and it will therefore be important to quantify the rate of atmospheric<br />
accumulation 3 . It has also been discovered that trout from fish farming activities on the Faroe Islands<br />
also contain unacceptably high levels of mercury 4 . In spite of strong indications of high mercury<br />
exposure to marine food chains and the possible high exposure in terrestrial ecosystems (as implied by<br />
the peat core data), there has not been any study reported to date, which explains the sources<br />
responsible for the high mercury levels and/or how to mitigate the problem.<br />
1