FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI
FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI
FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FIGURE 7. Spatial patterns in monthly mean BrO over the Arctic for April 2000 showing locations of recorded mercury depletion events<br />
at Barrow, AK; Alert, NWT; Ny-A° lesund, Spitzbergen; and Station Nord, Greenland (mean vertical column BrO is expressed as molecule<br />
cm -2 , derived from GOME satellite data). MDEs have also been recorded at Neumeyer station, Antarctica, in an area of elevated BrO (not<br />
shown).<br />
archipelago where BrO is enhanced (53). The Canadian<br />
archipelago is dominated by annual ice and open water<br />
polynyas and leads, and the extensive shorelines and ocean<br />
currents between the islands create shear zones between<br />
the “fast” ice grounded to shore and the pack ice moving<br />
with the ocean currents. This interface area is dominated by<br />
the open leads that are probable sources of bromine and<br />
marine products to the near-surface air. A recent estimate<br />
of the gross atmospheric Hg loading to northern waters in<br />
this region was 50 T/yr (13). This estimate was based on Hg<br />
levels in snowpack that were generally lower than those<br />
reported near Barrow. Other estimates from models (49) and<br />
our preliminary scaling from GOME BrO data such as Figure<br />
7(63) range from ∼150-300 T/yr, but all such estimates of<br />
gross fluxes carry a high uncertainty.<br />
To assess the overall net strength of the so-called missing<br />
polar sink (14) using the GOME satellite BrO maps, we must<br />
fully understand the importance of Hg re-emission during<br />
snowmelt. Although re-emission is apparent (e.g., Figure 6,<br />
also ref 12), we and the group working at Alert (62) are yet<br />
unable to quantify its overall effect on the net accumulation<br />
of Hg in the Arctic. A simple analysis based on the upslope<br />
of the Hg 0 concentration in air during Barrow snowmelt (as<br />
an indicator of the re-emission signal, Figures 1, 2, and 6)<br />
suggests that melt-related re-emission represents ∼10-20%<br />
of the deposited Hg (63), and our measurements of Hg in<br />
runoff indicate that Hg is being transported to the tundra<br />
during snowmelt. Quantifying the net effect of re-emission<br />
1254 9 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 36, NO. 6, 2002<br />
in the Arctic is clearly an important goal in understanding<br />
the fate of the deposited Hg.<br />
Since several lines of evidence support the hypothesis<br />
that elevated Hg levels exist in both abiotic and biotic pools<br />
in areas that are characterized by enhanced levels of BrO, an<br />
additional question arises: What will be the severity and extent<br />
of mercury depletion/oxidation events in the future? It is<br />
important to understand how the global mercury cycle will<br />
be affected by changes within the Arctic, as well as changes<br />
in atmospheric transport, and future and ongoing domestic/<br />
worldwide Hg emission reductions. Since a recent modeling<br />
study concluded that the concentrations of Hg in the Arctic<br />
atmosphere were indistinguishable from the global background<br />
(50), changes in physical climate might actually have<br />
a greater impact on the arctic Hg cycle than changes in global<br />
emissions.<br />
Multi-year ice thickness in the central arctic ocean, as<br />
measured by U.S. Navy submarines over the last two decades,<br />
has shown a remarkable 43% reduction in thickness (64). At<br />
this rate, the Arctic Ocean may become seasonally free of sea<br />
ice within 30-40 years. If this occurs, it will effectively double<br />
annual ice coverage, thereby doubling the total area affected<br />
by mercury depletion/oxidation and enhanced deposition.<br />
One likely scenario is that climate-driven reductions in multiyear<br />
ice coverage in favor of increased annual ice coverage<br />
throughout the Arctic will increase marine primary productivity<br />
(including ice algal communities). This scenario would<br />
result in production and release of more photolyzable