18.11.2012 Views

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 70<br />

have described that ozone and GEM are simultaneously depleted and that their depletion are highly<br />

correlated. The Station Nord data confirms this, see Figure 12., page 70, After the depletion period<br />

some very high concentrations of GEM appeared with values up to above 2 ng/m 3 and in 2002 up to<br />

4.5 ng/m 3 . In 2001, similar observations were made at Barrow (Lindberg et al. 2002, Appendix C).<br />

The high values after a depletion event are attributed to re-emission of mercury to the atmosphere<br />

(Lindberg et al., 2002). The interruption of the GEM time series at Station Nord in the middle of the<br />

summer makes it difficult to further interpret the importance of re-emission at Station Nord.<br />

GEM, ng/m 3<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

-0.5<br />

y = 0.039x - 0.095<br />

R 2 = 0.800<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />

Ozone, ppbv<br />

Figure 12. GEM against ozone concentrations at Station Nord, Northeast Greenland including<br />

a regression line obtained by orthogonal regression analysis. Data was selected from Fig. 11<br />

where at least 3 consecutive concentrations were decreasing on both ozone and GEM and the<br />

initial GEM concentration was above 0.4 ng m -3 . Only data from 2000 and 2001 were used as<br />

high concentrations in 2002 indicates the presence of other processes than in 2000 and 2001.<br />

The R 2 of approximately 0.8 was typical for the 2000 and 2001 campaigns. From Skov et al.,<br />

2003, submitted, Appendix C.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!