18.11.2012 Views

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Asian Chemistry Letters vol. XX, No 1 (2003) XX-XX<br />

of atmospheric mercury, see later. Therefore, inside the atmospheric boundary layer over sea ice<br />

during sunny conditions, it is assumed that there is an additional first order oxidation rate of ¼ hour -1<br />

converting Hg 0 to HgO. The fast oxidation stops, when surface temperature exceeds -4 o C (the freezing<br />

point saltwater). Removals of Hg 0 are due to the chemistry and the uptake by cloud water.<br />

Dry deposition velocities of the reactive gaseous mercury species (in the model assumed to be HgO<br />

and HgCl2) are based on the resistance method, where the surface resistance similar to HNO3 is used<br />

based on the flux measurements. Dry deposition velocities for RGM have been measured and reported<br />

from Barrow and are similar to those for HNO3 13,14 . Wet deposition of reactive and particulate<br />

mercury is parameterized by using a simple formulation with different in-cloud and below-cloud<br />

scavenging coefficients (see 9 ).<br />

4. Site<br />

The monitor was set up in a residential suburban area on the eastside of Tórshavn, the capital on Faroe<br />

Islands, located 62 o 01’ N and 6 o 47’ W approximately 400 km north of Scotland, 600 km west of<br />

Norway and 500 km east of Iceland. Because of this suburban location, we tested the influence of<br />

possible local sources by examining the time series based on wind direction and concentration. No<br />

correlation between these quantities was found, during both quiescent periods and during higher than<br />

background level episodes, thus allowing us to conclude that any local sources were insignificant.<br />

5. Results<br />

Measurements from May 2000 to March 2001 of GEM are shown in Figure 1. The data vary between<br />

a general level of about 2 ng/m 3 in the beginning of the campaign (in May) decreasing to<br />

approximately 0.5 ng/m 3 in July and August and increasing slightly to approximately in January and<br />

February of about 1.7 ng/m 3 . During the campaign we measured some values peaking at 3.4 ng/m 3 .<br />

For example we observed a notable high concentration episode from June 21 to 25, which was<br />

followed by a period where the concentration levels decreased to values between 0.8 to 1.3 ng/m 3 . The<br />

daily mean temperature in the periods varied from 5.7 0 C in May and June to 12.1 0 C in August. The<br />

average relative humidity was always close to 95%. During the rest of the year the concentrations<br />

slowly increased to a level of 1.7 ng/m 3 in January and February 2001.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!