18.11.2012 Views

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F. Roos-Barraclough et al. / The Science of the Total Environment 292 (2002) 129–139<br />

Table 1<br />

Results of the analysis of six certified standard reference materials<br />

using the suggested program on the Leco AMA 254<br />

SRM Measured wHgx n Certified wHgx<br />

(ngyg) (ngyg)<br />

NIST 45.1"0.8 13 44"4<br />

1515<br />

NIST 32.3"1.4 17 31"7<br />

1547<br />

NIST 118.9"0.9 2 150"50<br />

1575<br />

NIST 99.2"2.7 2 93.8"3.7<br />

1630a<br />

BCR 16.6"0.5 2 21"2<br />

281<br />

IAEA 170.2"0.1 2 200"40<br />

336<br />

to 0.025 ng Hg (ns2).It was therefore concluded<br />

that the effect of the length of program was<br />

negligible with respect to increased blank values<br />

due to increased Hg from the oxygen supply during<br />

longer programs.<br />

The result of 10 analyses of in-house peat<br />

standard OGS 1878 P, which were made up to<br />

95% water (RH OG18<br />

V), using the recommended<br />

2<br />

y1<br />

drying times, was 84.0"18.0 ng g Hg: a relative<br />

standard deviation of 22%.The result of 10 anal-<br />

y1<br />

yses of the dry material was 76.6"2 ng g Hg:<br />

a relative standard deviation of 8%.Thus, analysis<br />

of dried samples appears to reduce the standard<br />

deviation of the results.<br />

Analysis using a decomposition time of 125 s<br />

resulted in the lowest standard deviation among<br />

10 analyses of OGS 1878P (1.9% compared to<br />

5.15, 8.87 and 9.68% at 100, 150 and 175 s,<br />

respectively).Six SRMs analysed using this program<br />

gave the results shown in Table 1.<br />

3.2. Effect of prolonged drying at high temperatures<br />

in unfertilised and artificially fertilised peat<br />

The results (Fig.1) show overall trends in<br />

changes in Hg concentration at a rate of 6.7 ng<br />

y1 kg y1 h y1 at RT, 2.48 ng kg y1 h at 30 8C, y<br />

y1 2.36 ng kg y1 h y1 at 60 8C, y3.12 ng kg y1 h<br />

y1 at 90 8C and y8.52 ng kg y1 h at 105 8C for<br />

these samples (Table 2).Therefore, it appears that<br />

there is an increase over time in wHgx in peat,<br />

133<br />

which is left to air dry at low temperatures,<br />

probably due to absorbance of Hg from the lab<br />

air.In contrast, there is a decrease in Hg concentrations<br />

in samples dried at higher temperatures,<br />

probably due to loss of Hg by volatilisation.This<br />

loss is so gradual that drying at low temperatures<br />

for a few hours should not measurably affect the<br />

Hg concentrations.However, prolonged drying at<br />

higher temperatures could result in a significant<br />

loss of Hg and extensive drying at room temperature<br />

could give rise to significant Hg<br />

contamination.<br />

Artificial fertilisation of the peat was carried out<br />

to stimulate microbial activity.Artificial fertilisation<br />

has been found in the past to increase Hg loss<br />

by volatilisation (Lodenius et al., 1983).Average<br />

changes in Hg concentrations over the whole<br />

y1 y1<br />

temperature range were y0.26 ng kg h for<br />

y1 y1<br />

N-fertilised peat, y2.38 ng kg h for P-<br />

y1 y1<br />

fertilised peat, 1.18 ng kg h for K-fertilised<br />

y1 y1<br />

peat, y3.08 ng kg h for N, P and K-fertilised<br />

y1 y1<br />

peat and y0.28 ng kg h for unfertilised peat.<br />

These results indicate that the addition of phosphorus<br />

in particular increases mercury losses, probably<br />

due to increased microbial activity.The<br />

addition of potassium, however, appeared to<br />

decrease Hg loss.<br />

3.3. Effect of air-drying at room temperature on<br />

Hg content of peat<br />

The Hg concentration profile in the Arctic peat<br />

core was measured once using samples which had<br />

remained frozen since collection and once using<br />

samples which had been air-dried at RT in a cleanair<br />

cabinet overnight.Both sets of samples were<br />

corrected for bulk density and the results are<br />

displayed as volumetric concentrations (ng cm , y3<br />

Fig.2).The average difference in Hg concentration<br />

between Hg content of the samples was 0.3"0.9<br />

y3 ng cm , ns63, with the wet samples being on<br />

average slightly lower in Hg than the air-dried<br />

samples.This difference can be accounted for by<br />

a combination of the error involved in the bulk<br />

density determination and uptake of Hg from the<br />

lab air during air-drying.However, the previous<br />

experiment suggested a rate of increase in Hg<br />

y1 y1<br />

concentration of 6.7 pg g h during air drying

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!