18.11.2012 Views

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

espectively (Naucke et al., 1993). There is an exceptional zone of elevated ash content in the<br />

DK core at ca. 18cm (Fig. 2b), which may reflect the disturbance of the bog surface by peat<br />

cutting during WWII. Bulk density values are generally higher in the GL core (Fig. 2a) compared<br />

to DK core (Fig. 2b).<br />

The Hg concentration profiles reveal elevated Hg concentrations in both the upper and<br />

lower sections of the GL core (Fig. 2b), but only in the upper section of the DK core (Fig. 2b).<br />

To take into account the large differences in bulk density within and between the two cores, the<br />

Hg concentrations are also expressed on a volumetric basis (Fig. 2). The variation in volumetric<br />

Hg concentrations above 30 cm show a remarkable similarity between the two cores, with a very<br />

intense peak in volumetric Hg concentration in the GL core at 21 cm (Fig. 2a) and in the DK<br />

core at 17 cm (Fig. 2b), respectively. The selected age dates shown in Fig. 2 indicate that the<br />

zone of greatest Hg concentration in each core dates from the 1950`s. The very old radiocarbon<br />

ages in the DK peat samples below 29 cm (which was dated at 2395 ± 45 14 C yr BP) is evidence<br />

that some part of the original peat surface has been lost due to peat cutting. These old sections<br />

of the DK profile will not be considered further.<br />

Mercury concentrations in ombrotrophic (DK) versus minerotrophic (GL) peat profiles<br />

The chronology of changes in volumetric Hg concentrations is remarkably similar at<br />

the two sites (Fig. 2). The DK core is ombrotrophic, therefore Hg was supplied to this profile<br />

exclusively by atmospheric deposition. The greatest Hg concentrations are found in samples<br />

dating from the 1950`s. As there are no known natural geochemical processes which could have<br />

led to this pronounced Hg enrichment, we assume that the elevated Hg concentrations in the<br />

surface layers, compared to deeper, older peats, reflect increased rates of atmospheric Hg<br />

deposition caused by industrial activities. Similarly, in the GL core the greatest Hg<br />

concentrations are found in samples dating from the 1950`s. In contrast to the DK core, the GL<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!