Student Project Abstracts 2005 - Pluto - University of Washington

More documents

Recommendations

Info

throughout the work period. Five surfaces were angles and a continuous water flux for dynamic angle measurements for all diamond surfaces wasnanocrystalline, had a thickness range of about 2- contact angles were manipulated using a water between 71°-90°. The range of contact anglehysteresis for all diamond surfaces was quite3 m, and had diamond grain in the scale ofsyringe suspended above the platform. Thelarge, between 8°-74°. The range of grain density100nm. The nanocrystalline surfaces were grown syringe was attached to an apparatus on the for CAM all diamond surfaces was between 7-15 m -2 ;CONTACT ANGLE MEASUREMENTS ON DIAMOND SURFACESthe range forFORroughnessAwasSTUDYbetween 5.2-41nm.with varying concentrations of methane, which that would allow for adjustment in height of theON HYDROPHOBIC FORCESgrain density recording.affected the grain size. The other four surfacessyringe by a winding, spindle-like metal rod.were two by polycrystalline a winding, disks, spindle-like having a metal rod.DynamicDynamiccontactcontactangle measurementsanglewerethickness of around 180 m and totaling 11mm recorded by adjusting the metal platform so thatin diameter. measurements Both sides of the were polycrystalline recorded by adjusting the water the syringe metal was nearly platform touching a samplesurfaces so were that used the for research; water syringe one side wassurface. Therefore, the water flux could be betterwas nearly touching a sample surface.deemed smoother due to being polishedadjusted so that a droplet could grow or shrink formechanically Therefore, before being the sent water for flux this particular could be better advancing adjusted contact so that angle a and droplet receding contactresearch could use. The grow nanocystalline or shrink surfaces for wereangle measurements, respectively. After takingadvancing contact angle and recedingsignified from al25-al29, and the polycrystalline an image of a single water droplet, camera framessurfaces contact sd1u, sd1d, angle sd2u, and measurements, sd2d, respectively. respectively. and corresponding After taking data were an image exported from theCAM software into Microsoft Excel software toof a single water droplet, camera frames and corresponding dataProcedureplot graphs and chart pertinent data. The samewere Contact exported angle measurements from the were CAM taken software format into Microsoft was followed Excel for multiple softwareto plot graphs and chart pertinent data. The same formatimages of ausing a CAM 100 contact angle machine with a water droplet growing or shrinking on a sample50mm USB camera. For static contact anglesurface.measurements, the metal platform of the machinewas followed for multiple images of a water droplet growing orshrinking on a sample surface.The grain density and roughness wereinadvertently omitted for all the polycrystallinesamples except one, surface sd1u, which had aroughness of sample recording of 5.2 nm sans aWater syringe placing water droplet on sample surfaceWater syringe placing water droplet on sample surfaceANALYSISGenerally, advancing and receding contact angle graphs followedthe definition described previously. The peaks for contactangles and plateaus for baseline length were observed accordingly.The average range of advancing contact angle measurements forall diamond surfaces was between 70°-89°; the range of advancingbaseline lengths averaged between 3.8-5.2mm. The averagestandard error for advancing contact angles was around ± .394,and the average standard error for advancing baseline lengthswas around ± .002. The average range between receding contactangle measurements for all diamond surfaces was between 22°-66°; the range of receding baseline lengths averaged between 4.4-4.28mm. The average standard error for receding contact anglemeasurements was around ± 2.95, and the average standard errorfor receding contact angle measurements was around ± .14. Therange for static contact angle measurements for all diamond surfaceswas between 71°-90°. The range of contact angle hysteresisfor all diamond surfaces was quite large, between 8°-74°. Therange of grain density for all diamond surfaces was between 7-15μm -2 ; the range for roughness was between 5.2-41nm.The grain density and roughness were inadvertently omittedfor all the polycrystalline samples except one, surface sd1u,which had a roughness of sample recording of 5.2 nm sans a graindensity recording.RESULTS/CONCLUSIONSurface sd1u, as shown above, had the lowest recorded measurementfor roughness; it also had the lowest recorded measurementout of all the surfaces for contact angle hysteresis (8°). Generally, itwasResults/Conclusionobserved that the surfaces with high hysteresis seemed to haveGenerally,Generally,ititwaswasobservedobservedthatthatthethesurfacessurfaceswithwithSurfacehigh roughness Surface sd1u,sd1u,asasrecordings. shownshownabove,above,hadhadSurfaces thethewithhighhighhysteresishysteresishighseemedseemedroughnesstotohavehavehighhighrecordingsroughnessroughnesslowestlowestrecordedrecorded measurementmeasurementforforroughness;roughness;itit recordings.recordings.SurfacesSurfaceswithwithhighhighroughnessroughnessalsoalso seemedhadhadthethe lowestlowestto recordedrecordedhave measurementmeasurementhigh static outoutofofcontact recordingsrecordingsangle alsoalsomeasurements.seemedseemedtotohavehavehighhighstaticstaticcontactcontactall all the the surfaces for for contact contact angle angle hysteresis hysteresis (8°). (8°).Static Contact Angle of ofSurfaces(degrees)Static Contact Angle ofSurfaces(degrees)angle angle measurements.measurements.Roughness of of Surfaces Surfaces vs. vs. Static Static Contact ContactAngleAngleSeries1 Series18684al27 al27al28 al28828078sd1ual29 al2976al25 al25al26 al2674720 5 10 15 20 20 25 25 30 30 35 35 40 40 45 4586848280787674Roughness of of Surfaces(nRoughness of Surfaces vs. Static Contact Angleoosd1ual27 al27al29 al29720 5 10 10 15 15 20 20 25 25 30 30 35 35 40 40 45 45RoughnessRoughnessofofSurfaces(nSurfaces(nReferences[1][1]J.J. Israelachvili,Israelachvili,IntermolecularIntermolecular &SurfacesSurfacesForces,Forces,AcademicAcademicPress.Press.2 nd 2Ed., nd Ed.,20032003REFERENCESal25 al25al28 al28Series1al26 al26[1] J. Israelachvili, Intermolecular & Surfaces Forces, AcademicPress. 2 nd Ed., 200310 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Research Vol. 2 No. 1 Summer 2005
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSResearch support is gratefully acknowledged from the NationalScience Foundation Center on Materials and Devices forInformation Technology Research (CMDITR), DMR-0120967.Greetings, I am Ariel bedford, chemical engineering student fromAtlanta, Georgia. I attend Florida State University and hope to partakein more research in the nanotechnology sector.Greetings, I am Ariel Bedford, chemical engineering student fromAtlanta, Georgia. I attend Florida State University and hope topartake in more research in the nanotechnology sector.CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Research Vol. 2 No. 1 Summer 2005 11
Page 2 and 3: The material is based upon work sup
Page 4 and 5: TABLE OF CONTENTSSynthesis of Dendr
Page 6 and 7: 6 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Re
Page 8 and 9: SYNTHESIS OF DENDRIMER BUILDING BLO
Page 12 and 13: 12 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
Page 14 and 15: BARIUM TITANATE DOPED SOL-GEL FOR E
Page 16 and 17: BARIUM TITANATE DOPED SOL-GEL FOR E
Page 18 and 19: SYNTHESIS OF NORBORNENE MONOMER OF
Page 20: 20 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
Page 23 and 24: using different reaction conditions
Page 25 and 26: Synthesis of Nonlinear Optical-Acti
Page 27 and 28: quality of the XRD structures wasca
Page 29 and 30: Behavioral Properties of Colloidal
Page 32 and 33: Transmission electron microscopy ha
Page 36 and 37: areorient themselves with the elect
Page 38 and 39: Fabry-Perot modulators with electro
Page 42 and 43: QUANTIZED HAMILTON DYNAMICS APPLIED
Page 46 and 47: INVESTIGATING NEW CLADDING AND CORE
Page 48 and 49: Dr. Robert NorwoodChris DeRoseAmir
Page 50 and 51: SYNTHESIS OF TPD-BASED COMPOUNDS FO
Page 52 and 53: SYNTHESIS OF TPD-BASED COMPOUNDS FO
Page 54 and 55: OPTIMIZING HYBRID WAVEGUIDESpropaga
Page 56 and 57: At closer spaces the second undesir
Page 58 and 59: SYNTHESIS AND ANALYSIS OF THIOL-STA
Page 60 and 61:
60 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
Page 62 and 63:
QUINOXALINE-CONTAINING POLYFLUORENE
Page 64 and 65:
QUINOXALINE-CONTAINING POLYFLUORENE
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
SYNTHESIS OF DENDRON-FUNCTIONALIZED
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
BUILDING AN OPTICAL OXIMETER TO MEA
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
TOWARD MOLECULAR RESOLUTION C-AFM W
Page 80 and 81:
TOWARD MOLECULAR RESOLUTION C-AFM W
Page 82 and 83:
SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF E
Page 84 and 85:
My name is Aaron Montgomery and I a
Page 86 and 87:
1,1-DIPHENYL-2,3,4,5-TETRAKIS(9,9-D
Page 88 and 89:
1,1-DIPHENYL-2,3,4,5-TETRAKIS(9,9-D
Page 90 and 91:
EFFECTS OF SURFACE CHEMISTRY ON CAD
Page 92 and 93:
EFFECTS OF SURFACE CHEMISTRY ON CAD
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
SYNTHESIS OF A POLYENE EO CHROMOPHO
Page 98 and 99:
SYNTHESIS OF A POLYENE EO CHROMOPHO
Page 102 and 103:
102 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate
Page 104 and 105:
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MOLECULAR P
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
OPTIMIZATION OF SEMICONDUCTOR NANOP
Page 110 and 111:
OPTIMIZATION OF SEMICONDUCTOR NANOP
Page 112 and 113:
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PHOTODECOMP
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
ELECTROLUMINESCENT PROPERTIES OF OR
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
DETERMINATION OF MOLECULAR ORIENTAT
Page 122 and 123:
DETERMINATION OF MOLECULAR ORIENTAT
Page 124 and 125:
HYDROGEL MATERIALS FOR TWO-PHOTON M
Page 126 and 127:
HYDROGEL MATERIALS FOR TWO-PHOTON M
Page 128 and 129:
THE DESIGN OF A FLUID DELIVERY SYST
Page 130:
THE DESIGN OF A FLUID DELIVERY SYST
show all

Student Project Abstracts 2005 - Pluto - University of Washington

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?