EFFECTS OF SURFACE CHEMISTRY ON CADMIUM SELENIDE NANOCRYSTAL FLUORESCENCEThe similarity between the K-values <strong>of</strong> the amine and thiolpairs suggest that the alkyl chain effects are secondary to the effects<strong>of</strong> the head group. The larger K-values for the thiols showsthat the sulfur binds better than nitrogen, which is consistent withthe Hard-S<strong>of</strong>t Acid-Base Principal (HSAB). HSAB states thats<strong>of</strong>t acids such as cadmium preferentially bind to s<strong>of</strong>t bases suchas sulfur; nitrogen is a borderline s<strong>of</strong>t base and is less likely tocoordinate to the cadmium.Quenching occurs in the presence <strong>of</strong> thiol due to increasedhole traps 11 . The thiol’s sulfur atom is less electronegative than theamine’s nitrogen and therefore would donate electrons more readily.When the sulfur atom binds to the cadmium, the cadmium atombecomes more negatively charged. The increased partial negativecharge on the cadmium attracts holes in the semiconductor valenceband resulting in “hole trapping.” The trapping <strong>of</strong> holes hindersrecombination <strong>of</strong> an electron-hole pair resulting in fewer radiativedecay events and thus a lowered emission intensity.The QY enhancement occurring at amine concentrations below~0.01 M can be explained by an initial decrease in electrontraps when the nitrogen binds to cadmium sites. After all the electrontraps have been passivated, the amine will then bind creatinghole trap sites and quenches the florescence. This could suggestthat the amine preferentially binds to electron trap surface sites.The quenching by amines could result from several possibilities:(1) impurities in BA, (2) etching <strong>of</strong> CdSe NCs at high amineconcentrations, and (3) temperature changes. The molar ratio <strong>of</strong>CdSe NCs to water is ~10 in our test solutions. However, purgingthe BA with N 2(g) did not appear to change the amount <strong>of</strong>quenching. The quenching and blue-shifting <strong>of</strong> the absorbanceand PL peaks at high amine concentrations implies that the amineis etching the NC surface as demonstrated by Li et al. 12 AddingBA to chlor<strong>of</strong>orm caused the solution to heat up 10°C. This suggeststhat the heat released could be the heat <strong>of</strong> solvation <strong>of</strong> BAin chlor<strong>of</strong>orm solvent.To check the reversibility <strong>of</strong> the BA quenching, the BA froma test solution with 6.75 M BA concentration was pumped <strong>of</strong>fand chlor<strong>of</strong>orm was added back. Before pumping, the CdSe NCshad a maximum absorbance peak at 563 nm and quantum yield<strong>of</strong> 0.5%. After pumping <strong>of</strong>f the BA, QY was 0.9% and the absorbancespectra appeared more broadened. However, the largeblue shift <strong>of</strong> ~22 nm in the absorbance spectra was not reversiblesuggesting that indeed the nanoparticles were etched.The restoration <strong>of</strong> the quantum yield upon addition <strong>of</strong> ODAto ODT-quenched CdSe NCs indicates that the ligand bindingmay be reversible at low concentrations. However, the initial13% QY however was not achieved with the addition <strong>of</strong> ODA.At the high ODA concentrations, a drop in QY occurs. This dropis observed at the same ODA concentration as in the earlier tests<strong>of</strong> CdSe NCs and ODA.CONCLUSIONOur studies have shown that thiols quench the fluorescence<strong>of</strong> 4 nm diameter CdSe NCs, whereas at low concentrations (below~0.01 M) amines enhance PL and at high amine concentrationsquench PL. At low concentrations, the thiol and amine canbe reversibly exchanged. Reversibility tests indicate that the reactionwith high concentrations <strong>of</strong> amine is not completely reversibledue to surface etching. Fluorescence measurements canallow us to calculate the amount <strong>of</strong> ligand bound to the core if weassume that PL is proportional to surface coverage. In the future,H-NMR could be used to quantify surface coverage to complementfluorescence data.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSMany thanks to my mentors, Andrea Munro and David Ginger,for their help and guidance. Thank you to the NSF Science& Technology Center for Materials and Devices for InformationTechnology Research for funding the Summer <strong>2005</strong> Hooked onPhotonics REU program and allowing me to enrich my summerwith research. Thanks to Loren Kruse and Rajan Paranji <strong>of</strong> theUW NMR facilities and Brenden Carlson and Kolby Allen <strong>of</strong> theDalton Lab for their help in NMR spectroscopy. Also thanks toYeechi Chen for her support and guidance.REFERENCES1. Dannhauser, T.; O’Neil, M.; Johansson, K.; Whitten, D.;McLendon, G. “Photophysics <strong>of</strong> Quantized Colloidal SemiconductorsDramatic Luminescence Enhancement by Binding<strong>of</strong> Simple Amines” J. Phys. Chem 1986, Vol 90, No. 23, 6074-6076.2. Landes, C.; Burda, C.; Braun, M.; El-Sayed, M. A. “Photoluminescence<strong>of</strong> CdSe Nanoparticles in the presence <strong>of</strong> a Hole-Acceptor: n-butylamine” J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, Vol 105, No 15,2981-2986.3. Landes, C.; Braun, M.; El-Sayed, M. A.;“On the Nanoparticleto Molecular Size Transition: Fluorescence Quenching Studies”J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, Vol 105, No 43, 10554-10558.4. Hohng, S.; Ha, T. “Near-Complete Suppression <strong>of</strong> QuantumDot Blinking in Ambient Conditions” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,Vol 126, No 5, 1324-1325.5. Kalyuzhny, G.; Murray, R. “Ligand Effects on Optical Properties<strong>of</strong> CdSe nanocrystals.” J. Phys. Chem. B <strong>2005</strong>, Vol 109, No15, 7012-7021.6. Jeong, S.; Achermann, M.; Nanda, J.; Ivanov, S.; Klimov,V.; Hollingsworth, J. “Effect <strong>of</strong> Thiol–Thiolate Equilibrium onthe Photophysical Properties <strong>of</strong> Aqueous CdSe/ZnS NanocrystalQuantum Dots” J. Am. Chem. Soc. <strong>2005</strong>, Vol 127, No 29, 10126-10127.92 CMDITR Review <strong>of</strong> Undergraduate Research Vol. 2 No. 1 Summer <strong>2005</strong>
NG7. Peng, Z.; Peng, X. “Nearly Monodisperse and Shape-ControlledCdSe Nanocrystals via Alternative Route: Nucleation andGrowth” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, Vol 124, No 13, 3343-3353.8. Yu, W.; Qu, L.; Guo, W.; Peng, X. “Experimental Determination<strong>of</strong> the Extinction Coefficient <strong>of</strong> CdTe, CdSe, and CdS Nanocrystals.”Chem. Mater. 2003, Vol 15, No14, 2854-2860.9. Sachleben, J.; Wooten, E.; Emsley, L.; Pines, A.; Colvin, V.;Alivisatos, A. “NMR studies <strong>of</strong> the surface structure and dynamics<strong>of</strong> semiconductor nanocrystals” Chem. Phys. Lett, 1992, Vol198, No 5, 431-436.10. Berrettini, M.; Braun, G.; Hu, J.; Strouse, G. “NMR Analysis<strong>of</strong> Surfaces and Interfaces in 2-nm CdSe” J. Am. Chem. Soc.2004, Vol 126, No 22, 7063-7070.11. Wuister, S.; de Mello Donega, C.; Meijerink, A. “Influence<strong>of</strong> Thiol Capping on the Exciton Luminescence & Decay Kinetics<strong>of</strong> CdTe and CdSe Quantum Dots.” J. Phys. Chem. B 2004,Vol 108, No 45, 17393-17397.12. Li, R.; Lee, J.; Yang, B.; Horspool, D.; Aindow, M.; Papadimitrakopoulos,F. “Amine-Assisted Facetted Etching <strong>of</strong> CdSeNanocrystals.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. <strong>2005</strong>, Vol 127, No 8, 2524-2532.CMDITR Review <strong>of</strong> Undergraduate Research Vol. 2 No. 1 Summer <strong>2005</strong> 93
- Page 2 and 3:
The material is based upon work sup
- Page 4 and 5:
TABLE OF CONTENTSSynthesis of Dendr
- Page 6 and 7:
6 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate Re
- Page 8 and 9:
SYNTHESIS OF DENDRIMER BUILDING BLO
- Page 10 and 11:
throughout the work period. Five su
- Page 12 and 13:
12 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
- Page 14 and 15:
BARIUM TITANATE DOPED SOL-GEL FOR E
- Page 16 and 17:
BARIUM TITANATE DOPED SOL-GEL FOR E
- Page 18 and 19:
SYNTHESIS OF NORBORNENE MONOMER OF
- Page 20:
20 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
- Page 23 and 24:
using different reaction conditions
- Page 25 and 26:
Synthesis of Nonlinear Optical-Acti
- Page 27 and 28:
quality of the XRD structures wasca
- Page 29 and 30:
Behavioral Properties of Colloidal
- Page 32 and 33:
Transmission electron microscopy ha
- Page 34 and 35:
34 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
- Page 36 and 37:
areorient themselves with the elect
- Page 38 and 39:
Fabry-Perot modulators with electro
- Page 40 and 41:
40 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
- Page 42 and 43: QUANTIZED HAMILTON DYNAMICS APPLIED
- Page 44 and 45: 44 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
- Page 46 and 47: INVESTIGATING NEW CLADDING AND CORE
- Page 48 and 49: Dr. Robert NorwoodChris DeRoseAmir
- Page 50 and 51: SYNTHESIS OF TPD-BASED COMPOUNDS FO
- Page 52 and 53: SYNTHESIS OF TPD-BASED COMPOUNDS FO
- Page 54 and 55: OPTIMIZING HYBRID WAVEGUIDESpropaga
- Page 56 and 57: At closer spaces the second undesir
- Page 58 and 59: SYNTHESIS AND ANALYSIS OF THIOL-STA
- Page 60 and 61: 60 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
- Page 62 and 63: QUINOXALINE-CONTAINING POLYFLUORENE
- Page 64 and 65: QUINOXALINE-CONTAINING POLYFLUORENE
- Page 66 and 67: 66 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
- Page 68 and 69: SYNTHESIS OF DENDRON-FUNCTIONALIZED
- Page 70 and 71: 70 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
- Page 72 and 73: BUILDING AN OPTICAL OXIMETER TO MEA
- Page 74 and 75: 74 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
- Page 76 and 77: 76 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
- Page 78 and 79: TOWARD MOLECULAR RESOLUTION C-AFM W
- Page 80 and 81: TOWARD MOLECULAR RESOLUTION C-AFM W
- Page 82 and 83: SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF E
- Page 84 and 85: My name is Aaron Montgomery and I a
- Page 86 and 87: 1,1-DIPHENYL-2,3,4,5-TETRAKIS(9,9-D
- Page 88 and 89: 1,1-DIPHENYL-2,3,4,5-TETRAKIS(9,9-D
- Page 90 and 91: EFFECTS OF SURFACE CHEMISTRY ON CAD
- Page 94 and 95: 94 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate R
- Page 96 and 97: SYNTHESIS OF A POLYENE EO CHROMOPHO
- Page 98 and 99: SYNTHESIS OF A POLYENE EO CHROMOPHO
- Page 102 and 103: 102 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate
- Page 104 and 105: CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MOLECULAR P
- Page 106 and 107: 106 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate
- Page 108 and 109: OPTIMIZATION OF SEMICONDUCTOR NANOP
- Page 110 and 111: OPTIMIZATION OF SEMICONDUCTOR NANOP
- Page 112 and 113: CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PHOTODECOMP
- Page 114 and 115: 114 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate
- Page 116 and 117: ELECTROLUMINESCENT PROPERTIES OF OR
- Page 118 and 119: 118 CMDITR Review of Undergraduate
- Page 120 and 121: DETERMINATION OF MOLECULAR ORIENTAT
- Page 122 and 123: DETERMINATION OF MOLECULAR ORIENTAT
- Page 124 and 125: HYDROGEL MATERIALS FOR TWO-PHOTON M
- Page 126 and 127: HYDROGEL MATERIALS FOR TWO-PHOTON M
- Page 128 and 129: THE DESIGN OF A FLUID DELIVERY SYST
- Page 130: THE DESIGN OF A FLUID DELIVERY SYST